How EVIL is liberalism anyway?

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.
 
che-racist-quote.jpg
 
"Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politicians."
~~George S Patton
Gen USA


Patton was the lowest form of general..

Yes, a general who thought his job was to destroy the enemy instead of trying to understand what motivates them, what they like and don't like, who they are as people. Makes no sense at all for a general, does it?

No, just a gung-ho dickhead. There were plenty of better/greater generals/admirals than him during WWII. You might have heard of them - they had names like Eisenhower, Bradley and Nimitz...and that's only the American generals...

Patton did pretty well
 
your argument is also based on willfully misrepresentation
As this link proves

http://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652

The 1st Amendment is in no way being pissed on .

ROFL! Your article doesn't support your position, moron. It supports mine. You should try reading stuff before you post links to it.

Of course the 1st Amendment is being pissed on. Criticism of scientific theories is clearly protected by the First Amendment. Any attempt by government to prosecute people for doing so is a fucking douche bag Stalinist piece of shit. No one is surprised that you support such behavior.
It does? post where in the article it does .
Who is no one?


It is not clear that all the scientists who signed the letter have thought carefully about the tension between what they are asking and the continuing freedom to pursue lines of inquiry in public debate that the government may find unwelcome or unreasonable. “I have no idea how it affects the First Amendment,” says one Vermont scientist who backs the probe, quoted by Bruce Parker of Vermont Watchdog.

In a companion piece, Parker interviewed me about the constitutional implications of this extremely bad idea. (I should note that when I discuss RICO in the interview transcript, I’m referring to the civil-litigation side of the law, so-called civil RICO, which seems to be the part of the law the advocates hope to use.)

It is remarkable how many advocates of this scheme seem to imagine that the First Amendment protects only truthful speech and thus (they think) has no application here because climate skepticism is false.
Meaningless comparison.

You're attacking the article you linked to.
False I'm attacking your obvious denial.
 
By any reasonable measure of evil,

what is evil about liberalism? Be specific.
The fact that they violate the U.S. Constitution and other laws is evil. The fact they desire power and control over other is evil. The fact that they bear false witness and will ruin the reputation, career, and life of an individual by falsely calling them "racist" or "bigot" or "homophobic" is pure evil. The fact that they were never taught by their mommy and daddy (probably because liberal parents are absent parents who don't take care of their children) that stealing is wrong is evil. The fact that liberals believe it's ok to be a parasite on society and never produce anything in return for society is evil.

Is that enough for you NY or will you just pretend like none of that counts and then move the goal posts again?
You've provided no credible evidence constitutional violation by Liberals.
It's not possible to "prove" that, stupid. Nobody exists who's old enough.

What a maroon.

So then, all your claims that AGW is true are bogus?
Could you be any less ignorant?

You just said that it's not possible to prove that AGW is a farce. If that's the case, then it's also not possible to prove that it's not a farce.
really where?
Besides you are wrong there is more than enough evidence to prove climate change is real.
There is no evidence to prove it's not .
For your "logic" and assumption to be valid there would have to be equivalent amounts of evidence for both arguments.
Fail.
You said "it's not possible to prove," not "there is not enough evidence to prove." The former indicates a non-falsifiable statement, such as the claim "chocolate tastes better than vanilla." It can't be proven false, and it can't be proven true. That's the kind of claim you made with regard to AGW, "it can't be proven false."

However, I don't want to over tax your minute brain. I realize you will never get the point.
Another blatantly false comparison.
 
funny.... there's no such thing as satan.

and if there is, he loves pretend christians with their butt backward pretend morality.

Wait....what? Did you really just say there is no such thing as satan?:booze:

yes. because there isn't.
Just so you know - God vehemently disagrees with you on this one. It's hard to cast out something that doesn't exist. :eusa_eh:
Not in a fairly tale it's not.
Fail.
 
funny.... there's no such thing as satan.

and if there is, he loves pretend christians with their butt backward pretend morality.

Wait....what? Did you really just say there is no such thing as satan?:booze:

yes. because there isn't.
Just so you know - God vehemently disagrees with you on this one. It's hard to cast out something that doesn't exist. :eusa_eh:

not according to jews. you know that, right?
Actually - no. And so I immediately went and looked it up and this site disagrees with you (not to say it's accurate as I have no idea - but it was the first thing I found). It mentions Satan over and over...

Does Judaism Believe in Satan?
The jews do believe in satan just not in the way you wish they did.

The Jews don't believe in the devil because they say 'God is One'. Do they also not believe in angels? What about the devil as a fallen angel who wars with God? - Quora
 
funny.... there's no such thing as satan.

and if there is, he loves pretend christians with their butt backward pretend morality.
Wait....what? Did you really just say there is no such thing as satan?:booze:

yes. because there isn't.
Just so you know - God vehemently disagrees with you on this one. It's hard to cast out something that doesn't exist. :eusa_eh:

not according to jews. you know that, right?
Just curious - how does a Jew become a liberal? I mean, for one, if there is any group of people who should be terrified of handing power over to a dictator or oligarchy, it's Jews. And yet liberalism is the desire to usurp the U.S. Constitution and hand over power to a president. Secondly, the idiot liberals all over this country viciously attack the Jewish faith in support of Palestinian terrorists. How in the world do you reconcile that?!?

You are a paradox in every way...
Another Crapspiracy nut sack shoots his wad!
 
Another Crapspiracy nut sack shoots his wad!

First of all, you lost all credibility when you declared yourself the ultimate power in the universe. From this point on, you're just like a small child. We'll either laugh at the adorable things you say or cringe at your ignorance.

Second - anyone who calls the Holocaust a "conspiracy" is the ultimate tin foil hat conspiracy loon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top