How EVIL is liberalism anyway?

[Faun]

This is how evil liberalism is....

“We’re on the brink of a Charles Sumner moment, where he got beaten with a cane over the expansion of slavery in the country,” Pat said. For those unfamiliar with this story from American history, Charles Sumner was a senator from Massachusetts who, as part of the Radical Republicans, fought to end slavery. His speeches admonishing slavery infuriated pro-slavery senators — both Democrats and moderate Republicans. In 1856, Representative Preston Brooks, a democrat from South Carolina, beat Sumner severely on the head with a cane. Sumner, who became blinded by his own blood, staggered up the aisle of the senate chamber before collapsing and lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued beating a motionless Sumner until his cane broke. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by fellow South Carolinian, Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol and shouted, “Let them be!”

Are We on the Brink of a Charles Sumner Moment and Civil War?

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

 

[Pogo]

This is how evil liberalism is....

“We’re on the brink of a Charles Sumner moment, where he got beaten with a cane over the expansion of slavery in the country,” Pat said. For those unfamiliar with this story from American history, Charles Sumner was a senator from Massachusetts who, as part of the Radical Republicans, fought to end slavery. His speeches admonishing slavery infuriated pro-slavery senators — both Democrats and moderate Republicans. In 1856, Representative Preston Brooks, a democrat from South Carolina, beat Sumner severely on the head with a cane. Sumner, who became blinded by his own blood, staggered up the aisle of the senate chamber before collapsing and lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued beating a motionless Sumner until his cane broke. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by fellow South Carolinian, Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol and shouted, “Let them be!”

Are We on the Brink of a Charles Sumner Moment and Civil War?

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

As usual the point sails over your pointy little head Buttsoiler.
Sumner IS the Liberal here. "Liberal" and "Democrat" are not synonyms, Dumbass.
Second, it was not "Dumbocrats" beating him with a cane, it was Brooks. Singular, Plural: know the difference.
Finally it was not about "slavery" per se. It was about a personal slur on his cousin.

Go crack a history book at some point in your life.

 

[Pogo]

An astounding indictment on the failure of liberalism. A man who dedicated three decades of his life to defending America was assaulted for simply exercising his 1st Amendment rights and using the word "God". Speaks volumes about how evil liberalism is that they fear the word "God" and will attack on it's use...

Air Force Veteran Silenced for Using ‘God’ in Speech

This one was another turd floated here earlier this week, and it was debunked then too, with video. There ain't no evidence anyone was either "assaulted" or that the government silenced him. Nor was there any reference to "Liberals".

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

 

[bripat9643]

This is how evil liberalism is....

“We’re on the brink of a Charles Sumner moment, where he got beaten with a cane over the expansion of slavery in the country,” Pat said. For those unfamiliar with this story from American history, Charles Sumner was a senator from Massachusetts who, as part of the Radical Republicans, fought to end slavery. His speeches admonishing slavery infuriated pro-slavery senators — both Democrats and moderate Republicans. In 1856, Representative Preston Brooks, a democrat from South Carolina, beat Sumner severely on the head with a cane. Sumner, who became blinded by his own blood, staggered up the aisle of the senate chamber before collapsing and lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued beating a motionless Sumner until his cane broke. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by fellow South Carolinian, Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol and shouted, “Let them be!”

Are We on the Brink of a Charles Sumner Moment and Civil War?

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

 

[P@triot]

This is how evil liberalism is....they continue to resort to violence to oppress speech.

10 Hospitalized in Violent Clash Between Right-Wing Protesters, Counterprotesters at California Capitol

 

[Pogo]

This is how evil liberalism is....they continue to resort to violence to oppress speech.

10 Hospitalized in Violent Clash Between Right-Wing Protesters, Counterprotesters at California Capitol

What in the Wide World of Fuck does a right-wing white supremacy protest have to do with "Liberalism"?

 

[Faun]

This is how evil liberalism is....

“We’re on the brink of a Charles Sumner moment, where he got beaten with a cane over the expansion of slavery in the country,” Pat said. For those unfamiliar with this story from American history, Charles Sumner was a senator from Massachusetts who, as part of the Radical Republicans, fought to end slavery. His speeches admonishing slavery infuriated pro-slavery senators — both Democrats and moderate Republicans. In 1856, Representative Preston Brooks, a democrat from South Carolina, beat Sumner severely on the head with a cane. Sumner, who became blinded by his own blood, staggered up the aisle of the senate chamber before collapsing and lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued beating a motionless Sumner until his cane broke. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by fellow South Carolinian, Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol and shouted, “Let them be!”

Are We on the Brink of a Charles Sumner Moment and Civil War?

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

As usual the point sails over your pointy little head Buttsoiler.
Sumner IS the Liberal here. "Liberal" and "Democrat" are not synonyms, Dumbass.
Second, it was not "Dumbocrats" beating him with a cane, it was Brooks. Singular, Plural: know the difference.
Finally it was not about "slavery" per se. It was about a personal slur on his cousin.

Go crack a history book at some point in your life.

You realize buttplug is mentally handicapped, right?

 

[Faun]

This is how evil liberalism is....

“We’re on the brink of a Charles Sumner moment, where he got beaten with a cane over the expansion of slavery in the country,” Pat said. For those unfamiliar with this story from American history, Charles Sumner was a senator from Massachusetts who, as part of the Radical Republicans, fought to end slavery. His speeches admonishing slavery infuriated pro-slavery senators — both Democrats and moderate Republicans. In 1856, Representative Preston Brooks, a democrat from South Carolina, beat Sumner severely on the head with a cane. Sumner, who became blinded by his own blood, staggered up the aisle of the senate chamber before collapsing and lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued beating a motionless Sumner until his cane broke. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by fellow South Carolinian, Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol and shouted, “Let them be!”

Are We on the Brink of a Charles Sumner Moment and Civil War?

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

 

[bripat9643]

This is how evil liberalism is....

“We’re on the brink of a Charles Sumner moment, where he got beaten with a cane over the expansion of slavery in the country,” Pat said. For those unfamiliar with this story from American history, Charles Sumner was a senator from Massachusetts who, as part of the Radical Republicans, fought to end slavery. His speeches admonishing slavery infuriated pro-slavery senators — both Democrats and moderate Republicans. In 1856, Representative Preston Brooks, a democrat from South Carolina, beat Sumner severely on the head with a cane. Sumner, who became blinded by his own blood, staggered up the aisle of the senate chamber before collapsing and lapsing into unconsciousness. Brooks continued beating a motionless Sumner until his cane broke. Several other senators attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by fellow South Carolinian, Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol and shouted, “Let them be!”

Are We on the Brink of a Charles Sumner Moment and Civil War?

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

It is your problem because you implied that owning slaves means you were a conservative. It's your claim, now explain it. Otherwise just admit that you're a douche bag who intended to slander conservatives.

The term "conservative" didn't even exist in 1860.

 

[P@triot]

Sumner IS the Liberal here. "Liberal" and "Democrat" are not synonyms, Dumbass.
Second, it was not "Dumbocrats" beating him with a cane, it was Brooks. Singular, Plural: know the difference.
Finally it was not about "slavery" per se. It was about a personal slur on his cousin.

Go crack a history book at some point in your life.

You clearly know all about crack - uh? Sumner was a conservative Republican you tool. You are the party of racism and oppression. Own it, bitch. I don't blame you for being ashamed of it, but trying to rewrite history is just pathetic.

Yeah - it was Brooks with the cane, while another Dumbocrat stood up with a gun and prevented anyone else from getting involved.

 

[P@triot]

Bripat - do you notice the latent homosexuality of both Faun and Pogo? Despite having a screen name that can't even remotely be twisted into it, Pogo keeps saying "buttsoiler" (what does that even mean?!?) and Fauny says "buttplug".

Two dudes completely obsessed with homosexuality, men's asses, gay toys, etc. Poster child libtards. Ignorant, homosexual, angry, and mooching off of society like parasites.

 

[Faun]

Sumner was "evil" for being caned?

How stupid IS Buttsoiler anyway?

Stupid enough to not figure out that Sumner -- the victim here -- was one of the Liberal Abolitionists and that the Slave Power Democrats were the conservatives of the time? Stupid enough that he'd never heard of this incident before?

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

It is your problem because you implied that owning slaves means you were a conservative. It's your claim, not explain it. Otherwise just admit that you're a douche bag who intended to slander conservatives.

The south was, and is, conservative.

The south seceded to keep their slaves.

Explained.

Again.

 

[Faun]

Bripat - do you notice the latent homosexuality of both Faun and Pogo? Despite having a screen name that can't even remotely be twisted into it, Pogo keeps saying "buttsoiler" (what does that even mean?!?) and Fauny says "buttplug".

Two dudes completely obsessed with homosexuality, men's asses, gay toys, etc. Poster child libtards. Ignorant, homosexual, angry, and mooching off of society like parasites.

Buttplug's are homosexual toys?? You speak from experience?

Since when? Not that they can't be used by homosexuals but they certainly aren't restricted to homosexuals.

But thanks for letting me know that got under your skin, Buttplug.

 

[bripat9643]

Bwahahahaha! No - the Dumbocrats were evil for beating a conservative with a cane simply because he wanted to end slavery. This situation illustrates that Dumbocrats haven't evolved one bit in the past 150 years. Libtards are still racist as hell, they still support slavery, and they still resort to violence any time someone exercises their 1st Amendment rights if that speech doesn't fully support the failed and evil libtard ideology.

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

It is your problem because you implied that owning slaves means you were a conservative. It's your claim, not explain it. Otherwise just admit that you're a douche bag who intended to slander conservatives.

The south was, and is, conservative.

The south seceded to keep their slaves.

Explained.

Again.

How is slavery "conservative?" Please explain. Where the Romans "conservative?"

The term "conservative" didn't exist in 1860, so how could you possibly claim slave owners were "conservative?"

 

[Faun]

Slaves were not conservative; slave holders were.

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

It is your problem because you implied that owning slaves means you were a conservative. It's your claim, not explain it. Otherwise just admit that you're a douche bag who intended to slander conservatives.

The south was, and is, conservative.

The south seceded to keep their slaves.

Explained.

Again.

How is slavery "conservative?" Please explain. Where the Romans "conservative?"

The term "conservative" didn't exist in 1860, so how could you possibly claim slave owners were "conservative?"

Conservatism existed.

Again, for the hard of learning.... the south was, and is, conservative; and the south seceded to keep their slaves.

 

[bripat9643]

Bripat - do you notice the latent homosexuality of both Faun and Pogo? Despite having a screen name that can't even remotely be twisted into it, Pogo keeps saying "buttsoiler" (what does that even mean?!?) and Fauny says "buttplug".

Two dudes completely obsessed with homosexuality, men's asses, gay toys, etc. Poster child libtards. Ignorant, homosexual, angry, and mooching off of society like parasites.

Buttplug's are homosexual toys?? You speak from experience?

Since when? Not that they can't be used by homosexuals but they certainly aren't restricted to homosexuals.

But thanks for letting me know that got under your skin, Buttplug.

You seem to know an awful lot about about butt plugs.

 

[bripat9643]

How does being a slave holder make you a "conservative?"

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

It is your problem because you implied that owning slaves means you were a conservative. It's your claim, not explain it. Otherwise just admit that you're a douche bag who intended to slander conservatives.

The south was, and is, conservative.

The south seceded to keep their slaves.

Explained.

Again.

How is slavery "conservative?" Please explain. Where the Romans "conservative?"

The term "conservative" didn't exist in 1860, so how could you possibly claim slave owners were "conservative?"

Conservatism existed.

Again, for the hard of learning.... the south was, and is, conservative; and the south seceded to keep their slaves.

Really? Did it? I suppose you can support this idiotic claim.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Faun]

Bripat - do you notice the latent homosexuality of both Faun and Pogo? Despite having a screen name that can't even remotely be twisted into it, Pogo keeps saying "buttsoiler" (what does that even mean?!?) and Fauny says "buttplug".

Two dudes completely obsessed with homosexuality, men's asses, gay toys, etc. Poster child libtards. Ignorant, homosexual, angry, and mooching off of society like parasites.

Buttplug's are homosexual toys?? You speak from experience?

Since when? Not that they can't be used by homosexuals but they certainly aren't restricted to homosexuals.

But thanks for letting me know that got under your skin, Buttplug.

You seem to know an awful lot about about butt plugs.

Do you think Buttplug appreciates you giving him a reach-around like this?

 

[Faun]

Not my problem you don't know the south, who seceded to keep their slaves, was conservative. Still is.

It is your problem because you implied that owning slaves means you were a conservative. It's your claim, not explain it. Otherwise just admit that you're a douche bag who intended to slander conservatives.

The south was, and is, conservative.

The south seceded to keep their slaves.

Explained.

Again.

How is slavery "conservative?" Please explain. Where the Romans "conservative?"

The term "conservative" didn't exist in 1860, so how could you possibly claim slave owners were "conservative?"

Conservatism existed.

Again, for the hard of learning.... the south was, and is, conservative; and the south seceded to keep their slaves.

Really? Did it? I suppose you can support this idiotic claim.

The founders were actually very close to people who call themselves "conservative" today, for lack of a better term.