How Long Before someone sees Trump Buildings as fair game?

If terrorists want to go after the US why wouldnt they go after Trump buildings to provoke a response?

Progressives keep telling us they're the most compassionate people on the planet
The OP is already jerking himself off to the thought of Trump buildings being hit.

Would you admit they might be a target?
Yes, and so would everything else such as churches, Christmas markets, buildings with the American flag on them, trains and planes, Public places and gatherings like Time Square, large sporting events, all non Muslims, etc. What is your fucking point, should we submit to Islam?
My fuckin point is that when the President of the United States who is killing you is named TRUMP and TRUMP is on dozens of buildings, then those buildings become a tempting target


"My fuckin point is that when the President of the United States who is killing you is named TRUMP and TRUMP is on dozens of buildings, then those buildings become a tempting target"

Dayum, Rightwinger, is that YOU? Tell the MF like it is...heh heh heh
 
Hey, I'll make my own point and you make yours. This "Heres what you think" bullshit is tired. You just tried it and reversed it. Now you're back at it.
"Trump's buildings will become targets" wouldn't that be somewhat obvious, but to dumbass leftist whiners?
it wasnt readily obvious to you. You deflected about 8 posts before you finally answered the question. Arent you a rightwing whiner?
Yes, the point was obvious. You leftist whiners are angry at the election, and now it's "Trumps damn buildings" that are a problem. What will it be tomorrow? I can't wait.
Who said Drumpfs buildings were a problem? The OP just asked if they would become a target now specifically because they have his name on it. Stop being a snowflake and read slowly. That way you wont assign make believe points to other peoples statements.
Shut up, I'm superior to you, I have black in me.
So does Kim Kardashian, his name is Kanye!
 
[
My fuckin point is that when the President of the United States who is killing you is named TRUMP and TRUMP is on dozens of buildings, then those buildings become a tempting target

A lot more likely that you leftists will launch a terrorist attack on them.

Now that your coup failed an all.

Are you afraid snowflake?
 
Thought about that....And if he decides, as reported, to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem, I expect we will see a spike in attacks on Trump owned properties. We will see...
 
Scared little girls you are
I'm scared...if there was any doubt at all as to what your intentions [and most on the left] were when you first posted this thread there shouldn't be anymore...be careful, threatening violence in the manner you have is very close to being made the type of things folks can use to justify self-defense...people are sick of being threatened like this and are going to see to it that the law is on their side.
 
If the Gallup opinion poll results are any indication of the respect Obama has , not only at home but around the world, I'd have to call you a liar.

If the Gallup poll were any indication of anything, Hillary would be president.

You of the mindless left think that polling like minded sheep is somehow usefull.

I wouldn't expect admirers of Obama to fear him but to think enemies of the USA aren't fearful at all is a stretch. The number of notches on this president's gun are impressive .

I doubt the Muslim world is too fearful of the architect of the "ISIS Spring."
 
[
My fuckin point is that when the President of the United States who is killing you is named TRUMP and TRUMP is on dozens of buildings, then those buildings become a tempting target

A lot more likely that you leftists will launch a terrorist attack on them.

Now that your coup failed an all.

Are you afraid snowflake?

The virus that is the left is a danger to all decent people. Your Muslim allies are a good indicator of what your willing to do to push your agenda.
 
If terrorists want to go after the US why wouldnt they go after Trump buildings to provoke a response?
They don't want to provoke a response, dickhead.
Terrorists simply like killing innocent people.

That's all they want.

View attachment 102987


Guess how many lives were saved because we didn’t have to invade mainland Japan?

In the battle of Okinawa....

Casualties and losses

United States American


Manpower:
20,195 dead[5][6][7]

12,520 killed in action[8]

55,162 wounded[5][9][10]
26,000 psychiatric casualties[11]
Material:
12 destroyers sunk
15 amphibious ships sunk
9 other ships sunk
386 ships damaged
763[12]-768[13] aircraft
225 tanks

Empire of Japan Japanese

Manpower:
From 77,166 killed[14] to 110,000 killed (U.S. Estimate)[15]
More than 7,000 captured[15]
Material:
1 battleship sunk
1 light cruiser sunk
5 destroyers sunk
9 other warships sunk
1,430 aircraft lost[16]
27 tanks destroyed
743 artillery pieces, anti-tank guns, and anti-aircraft guns

Battle of Okinawa - Wikipedia



"If the study shows that the behavior of nations in all historical cases comparable to Japan's has in fact been invariably consistent with the behavior of the troops in battle, then it means that the Japanese dead and ineffectives at the time of the defeat will exceed the corresponding number for the Germans. In other words, we shall probably have to kill at least 5 to 10 million Japanese. This might cost us between 1.7 and 4 million casualties including [between] 400,000 and 800,000 killed.""
Casualties in the Invasion of Japan, July/August 1945

Swell, our leaders back then didn't have to do too much to justify the dropping two atomic bombs on civilians. Hate is an American tradition. But the memories of Pear Harbor
being devastated at the hands of ,"shudder," non Whites gave license for the hawks to kill them all if they could. Although Tokyo didn't receive an atomic gift, the city was firebombed with extreme malice. We at least showed some civility there, didn't we? Being burned ALIVE is MORE human than the long term effects of radiation poisoning i guess! As I said.... One man's hero is another man's terrorist!
 
Swell, our leaders back then didn't have to do too much to justify the dropping two atomic bombs on civilians. Hate is an American tradition. But the memories of Pear Harbor
being devastated at the hands of ,"shudder," non Whites gave license for the hawks to kill them all if they could. Although Tokyo didn't receive an atomic gift, the city was firebombed with extreme malice. We at least showed some civility there, didn't we? Being burned ALIVE is MORE human than the long term effects of radiation poisoning i guess! As I said.... One man's hero is another man's terrorist!
Your entire post is a rant about a democrat...they are the only ones who have ever done something like this
 
So you are hoping for the death of innocent people because you don't like Trump. That's what will happen if a terrorist attacks one of these buildings innocent people will die.
 
If the Gallup opinion poll results are any indication of the respect Obama has , not only at home but around the world, I'd have to call you a liar.

If the Gallup poll were any indication of anything, Hillary would be president.

You of the mindless left think that polling like minded sheep is somehow usefull.

I wouldn't expect admirers of Obama to fear him but to think enemies of the USA aren't fearful at all is a stretch. The number of notches on this president's gun are impressive .

I doubt the Muslim world is too fearful of the architect of the "ISIS Spring."
Two different polls. Besides, the Gallup Poll is still the best out there. Other sources like foreign news media and news papers support Obama's nearly universal favorability ratings around the world..

Well, let'sj just see how fearful they will be of Trump! I predict he will be the poster boy for an intensified recruiting campaign.
 
If terrorists want to go after the US why wouldnt they go after Trump buildings to provoke a response?
They don't want to provoke a response, dickhead.
Terrorists simply like killing innocent people.

That's all they want.

View attachment 102987


Guess how many lives were saved because we didn’t have to invade mainland Japan?

In the battle of Okinawa....

Casualties and losses

United States American


Manpower:
20,195 dead[5][6][7]

12,520 killed in action[8]

55,162 wounded[5][9][10]
26,000 psychiatric casualties[11]
Material:
12 destroyers sunk
15 amphibious ships sunk
9 other ships sunk
386 ships damaged
763[12]-768[13] aircraft
225 tanks

Empire of Japan Japanese

Manpower:
From 77,166 killed[14] to 110,000 killed (U.S. Estimate)[15]
More than 7,000 captured[15]
Material:
1 battleship sunk
1 light cruiser sunk
5 destroyers sunk
9 other warships sunk
1,430 aircraft lost[16]
27 tanks destroyed
743 artillery pieces, anti-tank guns, and anti-aircraft guns

Battle of Okinawa - Wikipedia



"If the study shows that the behavior of nations in all historical cases comparable to Japan's has in fact been invariably consistent with the behavior of the troops in battle, then it means that the Japanese dead and ineffectives at the time of the defeat will exceed the corresponding number for the Germans. In other words, we shall probably have to kill at least 5 to 10 million Japanese. This might cost us between 1.7 and 4 million casualties including [between] 400,000 and 800,000 killed.""
Casualties in the Invasion of Japan, July/August 1945

Swell, our leaders back then didn't have to do too much to justify the dropping two atomic bombs on civilians. Hate is an American tradition. But the memories of Pear Harbor
being devastated at the hands of ,"shudder," non Whites gave license for the hawks to kill them all if they could. Although Tokyo didn't receive an atomic gift, the city was firebombed with extreme malice. We at least showed some civility there, didn't we? Being burned ALIVE is MORE human than the long term effects of radiation poisoning i guess! As I said.... One man's hero is another man's terrorist!

You do realise that the planned invasion of the japanese mainland would have killed millions more Japanese than the bombs drop on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The estimates for Operation Downfall were 250,000 US casualties and 5-10 million Japanese deaths. You should also look at the Japanese occupation of every country they invaded, I spent sometime in South Korea and have talked to people who lived through the horror. Millions were murdered. But sure the US is the bad guy.
 
It'll be interesting to see who hits one of his buildings first - jihadists or the Regressive Left.

Little friendly rivalry there. Birds of a feather 'n stuff.
.
Or it will be a leftist jihadi.

:blowup:
 
If terrorists want to go after the US why wouldnt they go after Trump buildings to provoke a response?

Because historically terrorists are almost always white males and Drumpf is the new symbol of white manliness. I know its amusing to see an orange carnival barker as a symbol of white male manlines but there you have it.
Oh you lefties, always checking out the "white male manlines"
I'm telling you, the guy is deranged. He sees the hand of evil Whitey in everything that is wrong with the world.
 
Swell, our leaders back then didn't have to do too much to justify the dropping two atomic bombs on civilians. Hate is an American tradition. But the memories of Pear Harbor
being devastated at the hands of ,"shudder," non Whites gave license for the hawks to kill them all if they could. Although Tokyo didn't receive an atomic gift, the city was firebombed with extreme malice. We at least showed some civility there, didn't we? Being burned ALIVE is MORE human than the long term effects of radiation poisoning i guess! As I said.... One man's hero is another man's terrorist!
Your entire post is a rant about a democrat...they are the only ones who have ever done something like this

Are you sure it wasn't a bipartisan effort? I suspect it was! But even Reagan was a Democrat back then! But that sissy was too chicken to fight for his country. All he did was make news reel movies during his service. The Democrats took to the skies and fought on the ground as well. Is that what you are implying?
 
If terrorists want to go after the US why wouldnt they go after Trump buildings to provoke a response?

Progressives keep telling us they're the most compassionate people on the planet
The OP is already jerking himself off to the thought of Trump buildings being hit.

Would you admit they might be a target?
Yes, and so would everything else such as churches, Christmas markets, buildings with the American flag on them, trains and planes, Public places and gatherings like Time Square, large sporting events, all non Muslims, etc. What is your fucking point, should we submit to Islam?
My fuckin point is that when the President of the United States who is killing you is named TRUMP and TRUMP is on dozens of buildings, then those buildings become a tempting target
Yeah so? There are plenty of similar targets. Right now they're targeting Christians and Christmas, just to show how much they love and respect the "people of the book' and their "prophet" Jesus.
 

Forum List

Back
Top