How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept That He Wants Them Around?

How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept That He Wants Them Around? - YouTube

I thought this video was very intelligent. And I have no mystical beliefs.

Leviticus 18
18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Are you done now?
 
How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept That He Wants Them Around? - YouTube

I thought this video was very intelligent. And I have no mystical beliefs.

Leviticus 18
18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Are you done now?

Leviticus also says homosexuals should be stoned to death - why do you cherry pick your Bible?
 
How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept That He Wants Them Around? - YouTube

I thought this video was very intelligent. And I have no mystical beliefs.

Leviticus 18
18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Are you done now?

Leviticus also says homosexuals should be stoned to death - why do you cherry pick your Bible?

Here's the argument

How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept That He Wants Them Around?
If being gay is an abomination to God why would he want them around? To say God finds it an abomination is not cherry picking
You can now move along
 
How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept That He Wants Them Around? - YouTube

I thought this video was very intelligent. And I have no mystical beliefs.

Leviticus 18
18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Are you done now?

Leviticus also says homosexuals should be stoned to death - why do you cherry pick your Bible?
And back in those days they did so. They also used to hang people in the streets but they do not do that anymore either. They used to put women out of the village when they had their menstral cycle also the lepers but we don't do many things the law spoke of then. It doesn't mean that the guidelines were wrong. What is created by two of the same gender? No children. Even many trees have to have a male and female to bear fruit so what good comes of a same gender union? The rectum is not designed for that activity. If it was it would be functional as such.
 
Leviticus 18
18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Are you done now?

Leviticus also says homosexuals should be stoned to death - why do you cherry pick your Bible?
And back in those days they did so. They also used to hang people in the streets but they do not do that anymore either. They used to put women out of the village when they had their menstral cycle also the lepers but we don't do many things the law spoke of then. It doesn't mean that the guidelines were wrong. What is created by two of the same gender? No children. Even many trees have to have a male and female to bear fruit so what good comes of a same gender union? The rectum is not designed for that activity. If it was it would be functional as such.

Straight people engage in anal sex, and infertile couples still have sex, even though no kids are produced.
 
Leviticus also says homosexuals should be stoned to death - why do you cherry pick your Bible?
And back in those days they did so. They also used to hang people in the streets but they do not do that anymore either. They used to put women out of the village when they had their menstral cycle also the lepers but we don't do many things the law spoke of then. It doesn't mean that the guidelines were wrong. What is created by two of the same gender? No children. Even many trees have to have a male and female to bear fruit so what good comes of a same gender union? The rectum is not designed for that activity. If it was it would be functional as such.

Straight people engage in anal sex, and infertile couples still have sex, even though no kids are produced.

Gay's are still an abomination to God.
 
And back in those days they did so. They also used to hang people in the streets but they do not do that anymore either. They used to put women out of the village when they had their menstral cycle also the lepers but we don't do many things the law spoke of then. It doesn't mean that the guidelines were wrong. What is created by two of the same gender? No children. Even many trees have to have a male and female to bear fruit so what good comes of a same gender union? The rectum is not designed for that activity. If it was it would be functional as such.

Straight people engage in anal sex, and infertile couples still have sex, even though no kids are produced.

Gay's are still an abomination to God.

That would true if you could prove God existed.
 
I had 2 hog sammiches at Hudsons BBQ in Roberta, Ga. last Monday with Brunswick Stew that had hog in it also.
Upon leaving that fine culinary establishment there was a man outside with a rock and I thought for sure Leviticus' rath had come down upon me from the Lord Almighty.
The man threw the rock right through the window of the local Police Department.
Ernest T. Bass ain't got the religion much less could read Leviticus.
I had shrimp last night and am sure to go to HAYELLL!!!!!
 
Anyone that quotes those old 3000 year old Jewish laws in the Bible as what God wants has to be a little out there.
There are so many whacky things they DO NOT LIVE BY there also.
Gay folks are the easy target. So folks single them out and go about their way and IGNORE the dozens of rules in the Old Testament.
God and especially Jesus is going to BE PISSED at how gay folk are treated.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.
 
Anyone that quotes those old 3000 year old Jewish laws in the Bible as what God wants has to be a little out there.
There are so many whacky things they DO NOT LIVE BY there also.
Gay folks are the easy target. So folks single them out and go about their way and IGNORE the dozens of rules in the Old Testament.
God and especially Jesus is going to BE PISSED at how gay folk are treated.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.
Try a little hard.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
 
Illogical.

If God exists, He exists whether or not His existence is "proven" to your satisfaction.

Plus it's rrelevant to the OP since the OP think's God does exist.

I agree that the premise of the OP includes the existence of God. Therefore, the challenge to prove His existence is out of bounds.

:D

Color me shocked.

They start these stupid little threads claiming God exist and then someone comes along when you have proven them wrong and says it would be true if God existed. I call that a deflection. What say you?:badgrin:
 
Anyone that quotes those old 3000 year old Jewish laws in the Bible as what God wants has to be a little out there.
There are so many whacky things they DO NOT LIVE BY there also.
Gay folks are the easy target. So folks single them out and go about their way and IGNORE the dozens of rules in the Old Testament.
God and especially Jesus is going to BE PISSED at how gay folk are treated.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.
Try a little hard.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

You need to try a little harder.
That is Paul speaking in Romans to the Jews who he is trying to sweet talk.
That was not God speaking in Romans.
 
Anyone that quotes those old 3000 year old Jewish laws in the Bible as what God wants has to be a little out there.
There are so many whacky things they DO NOT LIVE BY there also.
Gay folks are the easy target. So folks single them out and go about their way and IGNORE the dozens of rules in the Old Testament.
God and especially Jesus is going to BE PISSED at how gay folk are treated.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.
Try a little hard.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

You need to try a little harder.
That is Paul speaking in Romans to the Jews who he is trying to sweet talk.
That was not God speaking in Romans.
This is what you said.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.
 
God may have not indeed ‘created’ gays; fortunately the question is Constitutionally irrelevant, as one is entitled to choose in the context of the right to privacy how to best conduct his personal life, free from interference from the state:

[Homosexuals] seek to control a personal relationship that, whether or not entitled to formal recognition in the law, is within the liberty of persons to choose without being punished as criminals. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to choose to enter upon relationships in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons.

LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
 
Try a little hard.
Romans 1
1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

You need to try a little harder.
That is Paul speaking in Romans to the Jews who he is trying to sweet talk.
That was not God speaking in Romans.
This is what you said.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.

Context of the discussion was what God said.
 
You need to try a little harder.
That is Paul speaking in Romans to the Jews who he is trying to sweet talk.
That was not God speaking in Romans.
This is what you said.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.

Context of the discussion was what God said.

But that is not what you said.
There is no mention of them in The New Testament.
It is in context to what you said.
Does it hurt when you
1slj61.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top