Manchester
Gold Member
Who is the "we" in the thread title?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is the "we" in the thread title?
""WE"" belong to Interpol and NATO, Sammy.Clinton says torture doesnt work; nonsense, of course it works.
But I also think we could have gotten the information out of the captured terrorist and saved a lot of lives today.
What say the rest of you?
"We" didn't capture him.
Who is the "we" in the thread title?
IT is a hypothetical 'we', dude.
But obviously the Belgians did not take the threat seriously or they would have kept tabs on a terrorist from Syria.
As tot he OP, reading Social Marxist nonsens is torture to any rational person.
IT is called 'cooperation in law enforcement' or 'mutual support in the War on Terror'.""WE"" belong to Interpol and NATO, Sammy.Clinton says torture doesnt work; nonsense, of course it works.
But I also think we could have gotten the information out of the captured terrorist and saved a lot of lives today.
What say the rest of you?
"We" didn't capture him.
So we can waltz into Belgium, flash our badges, and start torturing a Belgian prisoner?
Prove it.
IT is called 'cooperation in law enforcement' or 'mutual support in the War on Terror'.""WE"" belong to Interpol and NATO, Sammy.Clinton says torture doesnt work; nonsense, of course it works.
But I also think we could have gotten the information out of the captured terrorist and saved a lot of lives today.
What say the rest of you?
"We" didn't capture him.
So we can waltz into Belgium, flash our badges, and start torturing a Belgian prisoner?
Prove it.
Besides, it is a HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION, goof ball.
But obviously the Belgians did not take the threat seriously or they would have kept tabs on a terrorist from Syria.
As tot he OP, reading Social Marxist nonsens is torture to any rational person.
In order for enhanced interrogation to work, you have to have an idea what kind of information you're looking for. Without a specific plan, you'd be putting the subject under duress for the hell of it. In Vietnam, if you wanted specific information from a subject you'd throw his pal out of the helicopter (body bomb) and grab him with the same intentions. If you'd done it right he wouldn't know if the bird was five feet or five hundred feet off the floor. That got a few of them talking pretty fast.
I guess if it worked, then good, but I think the Islamic terrorist cadre is a bit harder than that, and you might have to get down to some basic motivations other than just saving their own lives. I think that most of them are chosen because they have given up on life and want to go to their reward. So you have to play with that a little bit to losen up their confidence in having Heaven awaiting them.
Oh just for record...
...how do you know he WASN'T tortured? Prove it.
""WE"" belong to Interpol and NATO, Sammy.Clinton says torture doesnt work; nonsense, of course it works.
But I also think we could have gotten the information out of the captured terrorist and saved a lot of lives today.
What say the rest of you?
"We" didn't capture him.
When did America get the option of torturing prisoners captured in France for committing crimes or terrorism in France or any other foreign nation?
When did America get the option of torturing prisoners captured in France for committing crimes or terrorism in France or any other foreign nation?
We are probably supposed to send in specially trained SEAL Teams for that......
"How Many Lives Would Have Been Saved Had we Tortured the Captured Paris Terrorist?"
How many rightwing threads are going to fail because they’re loaded questions fallacies – this thread being one of many example
Another cut and past cannned post.
When did America get the option of torturing prisoners captured in France for committing crimes or terrorism in France or any other foreign nation?
In other words, Trump is just talking bullshit the way he always does and you are unable to give a sensible, rational or factual basis. Trump followers are suckers for his nonsense responses to critical situations.When did America get the option of torturing prisoners captured in France for committing crimes or terrorism in France or any other foreign nation?
Since 1935 the US has been a continuing criminal enterprise. The impostors in DC claim to have the authority to do whatever, whenever for whatever with impunity The so-called SCOTUS will look the other way in order to preserve and support the gargantuan bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.
.