How much ‘pork’ did the House cut from the Bill to make room for the additional $1,400?

[BrokeLoser]

You know since Dems are suddenly concerned with deficit spending and all?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

 

[dblack]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Which leaves me wondering, why couldn't they just unpackage them - ie vote only on the relief bill? Why did they attach all the pork to it in the first place?

 

[martybegan]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

 

[progressive hunter]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

one vote one bill,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

to force a vote for the pork,,,

 

[my2¢]

I don't recall reading or hearing any mention at all about deficit spending back when the Republican Senate came out with their stimulus bill back in March. I knew when I voted for Biden that careless lack of concern about the deficit would change if he won.

 

[martybegan]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

to force a vote for the pork,,,

I wanna hear jackoff say it.

 

[Meister]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

And? Does that mean they can't cut money out of one Bill to offset the other Bill?
A little logic would go a long way....even on The Hill.

 

[progressive hunter]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

to force a vote for the pork,,,

I wanna hear jackoff say it.

better grab a cup of coffee and a doughnut cause its gonna be a while,,,

 

[flacaltenn]

You know since Dems are suddenly concerned with deficit spending and all?

Dont wind me up here. This AINT "Covid Relief".. THe 2 parties are making it rain checks to SECURE your allegiance.. How MUCH are YOU worth?

And everyone falls for the robbery.. Listen to Bernie "Honeymoon in Moscow" Sanders repeat this line ------ "We HAVE to get relief to WORKING FAMILIES NOW !!"

Hey Bernie you mental reject -- WORKING FAMILIES DONT NEED A FUCKING COVID RELIEF CHECK !!!!

 

[White 6]

You know since Dems are suddenly concerned with deficit spending and all?

None, as spending by the trump administration, even if it benefit continue into next administration are the blame of the trump administration. It is up to the opposing party and the president for blame in reckless spending. Trump got played, again as usual. This time, by not giving a damn until it was too late. Don't know what Mitch will do for sure on the $2000 thing. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He will agree with house and override trump's veto of NDAA, another spending bill trump didn't give a damn about until it was done without him. If it has wasted spend (and some of it always is) it is trump's also. He's a dumb ass and always has been. On the 6th he will be a certified has been, and not just a lame duck, but a plucked duck.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

Negotiated with Republicans...who got their pork too. Wrapped the bills into one to cover spending through the summer next year. If you don't like it, take it up with the bipartisan group that negotiated it.

Highlights of $900B COVID-19 stimulus package, $1.4T government spending bill

Besides $600 stimulus checks, the COVID-19 relief bill includes funding for schools, rental assistance and farm aid.

abc7news.com

 

[martybegan]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

Negotiated with Republicans...who got their pork too. Wrapped the bills into one to cover spending through the summer next year. If you don't like it, take it up with the bipartisan group that negotiated it.

Highlights of $900B COVID-19 stimulus package, $1.4T government spending bill

Besides $600 stimulus checks, the COVID-19 relief bill includes funding for schools, rental assistance and farm aid.

abc7news.com

Did the Republicans ask for the bills to be together or did the dems make it so and then told them to take it or leave it?

 

[dblack]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

Negotiated with Republicans...who got their pork too. Wrapped the bills into one to cover spending through the summer next year. If you don't like it, take it up with the bipartisan group that negotiated it.

Highlights of $900B COVID-19 stimulus package, $1.4T government spending bill

Besides $600 stimulus checks, the COVID-19 relief bill includes funding for schools, rental assistance and farm aid.

abc7news.com

Yeah - it's not a partisan thing. The question is, why do we put up with it? Trump was right to cal it out (and wrong to cave).

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Which leaves me wondering, why couldn't they just unpackage them - ie vote only on the relief bill? Why did they attach all the pork to it in the first place?

You'll have to ask the people who negotiated it.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Why were they packaged together?

Bills like these two have to originate in the House, so Dems wanted them combined. Why?

Negotiated with Republicans...who got their pork too. Wrapped the bills into one to cover spending through the summer next year. If you don't like it, take it up with the bipartisan group that negotiated it.

Highlights of $900B COVID-19 stimulus package, $1.4T government spending bill

Besides $600 stimulus checks, the COVID-19 relief bill includes funding for schools, rental assistance and farm aid.

abc7news.com

Did the Republicans ask for the bills to be together or did the dems make it so and then told them to take it or leave it?

Bipartisan negotiation. Both sides got theirs.
It's reality.

 

[dblack]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Which leaves me wondering, why couldn't they just unpackage them - ie vote only on the relief bill? Why did they attach all the pork to it in the first place?

You'll have to ask the people who negotiated it.

I'm asking the partisan tools who fall in line and support this shit. We get bad government because we tolerate it.

 

[debbiedowner]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Which leaves me wondering, why couldn't they just unpackage them - ie vote only on the relief bill? Why did they attach all the pork to it in the first place?

From what I've read of the bill they past last night it was a new stand alone bill for the $2000 and nothing else.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

None as I understand it..on either side. Because there were two bills wrapped together. What is it you guys don't get about the omnibus spending (expenditures that were negotiated months ago) and relief bill were packaged together?

Do you think that was appropriate?