Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,895
Fucking moron, Bernie don't know jack shit… LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fucking moron, Bernie don't know jack shit… LOL
Regulated in terms of held responsible for harming customers (civil court) or directly stealing from them (criminal courts) sure. Regulated in terms of controlled in advance, no
I trust the federal government to STOP corporations from exporting jobs, to stop them from corrupting our political system, and to regulate them to not cheat and lie tot he customers
Let's say there are 10 things you want to do. I decide I'll let you do five your way, and tell you which five you can do, then you're going to do five my way.
I actually decided all ten, you weren't free for any of them because I chose not only the five that you had to do my way, but I chose the ones I allowed you to do yours.
They are socialist countries because government decides what the people are free to do, and that which they can give, they can take away
However you chose to describe their system, it WORKS and the people in those countries are not seeing the jobs exported, nor do they have to train their immigrant labor that is taking their jobs.
I'll tell you a far worse form of government than socialism; Corporate Crony Oligarchy. They fuck their own people day in and day out and the corporate owned media just ignores it all. And the wealthiest 1% blow all the statistics out fo the water, with the top 20% owning far more than the statistically average 80%. The top 1% alone owns that.
The Middle Class, that is me BTW, are getting reamed, robbed and lied to about it all.
It's going to be time to water the Tree of Liberty if things dont get fixed soon.
It works if liberty's not important to you and you are good with just being a subject of government, sure.
But let's say for a minute liberty doesn't matter to you and you like their system. To conclude that what would work in a country a tiny fraction the number of people and size of their economy with highly homogeneous people with common ethnic, cultural and moral values would work in a country so many times larger and more diverse is just butt ridiculous
Good point. I like the Nordic model, but am unsure if it would work on a large scale. It is possible it could work better on a large scale, but don't think anyone knows.
Scale is certainly a big part of it as we agreed. But the part of the homogeneous people is probably a much larger issue. I work with a lot of Europeans both here and in Europe and I know a lot of Scandinavians, particularly Swedes. And yes, they love their healthcare system. But they share a background, ethnicity, values, attitudes. It's small and they are all behind it in the same way. Look at our campaign now for President, this is a huge, diverse, splintered country. Most people opposed Obamacare, Democrats forced it through by pure guile after Kennedy died.
Scandinavians are virtually universally behind their system, we're completely divided. And government running all that is so absolute. It's ridiculous to conclude what works there would work here or even to believe there is any chance it would. It would just be blunt force one half the country compelling it on the other. Tyranny of the majority, and a tiny majority
I trust the federal government to STOP corporations from exporting jobs, to stop them from corrupting our political system, and to regulate them to not cheat and lie tot he customers
OMG, you've been Berned. Feel behind your ears, it's actually still wet, isn't it? Logic with a socialist is pointless. And I don't know how you realized you and Bernie know that you're right and the field of economics is wrong about free trade, but obviously you do so hey, I concede. You believe your dream world over empirical data, it is what it is
Let's say there are 10 things you want to do. I decide I'll let you do five your way, and tell you which five you can do, then you're going to do five my way.
I actually decided all ten, you weren't free for any of them because I chose not only the five that you had to do my way, but I chose the ones I allowed you to do yours.
They are socialist countries because government decides what the people are free to do, and that which they can give, they can take away
However you chose to describe their system, it WORKS and the people in those countries are not seeing the jobs exported, nor do they have to train their immigrant labor that is taking their jobs.
I'll tell you a far worse form of government than socialism; Corporate Crony Oligarchy. They fuck their own people day in and day out and the corporate owned media just ignores it all. And the wealthiest 1% blow all the statistics out fo the water, with the top 20% owning far more than the statistically average 80%. The top 1% alone owns that.
The Middle Class, that is me BTW, are getting reamed, robbed and lied to about it all.
It's going to be time to water the Tree of Liberty if things dont get fixed soon.
It works if liberty's not important to you and you are good with just being a subject of government, sure.
But let's say for a minute liberty doesn't matter to you and you like their system. To conclude that what would work in a country a tiny fraction the number of people and size of their economy with highly homogeneous people with common ethnic, cultural and moral values would work in a country so many times larger and more diverse is just butt ridiculous
Good point. I like the Nordic model, but am unsure if it would work on a large scale. It is possible it could work better on a large scale, but don't think anyone knows.
Scale is certainly a big part of it as we agreed. But the part of the homogeneous people is probably a much larger issue. I work with a lot of Europeans both here and in Europe and I know a lot of Scandinavians, particularly Swedes. And yes, they love their healthcare system. But they share a background, ethnicity, values, attitudes. It's small and they are all behind it in the same way. Look at our campaign now for President, this is a huge, diverse, splintered country. Most people opposed Obamacare, Democrats forced it through by pure guile after Kennedy died.
Scandinavians are virtually universally behind their system, we're completely divided. And government running all that is so absolute. It's ridiculous to conclude what works there would work here or even to believe there is any chance it would. It would just be blunt force one half the country compelling it on the other. Tyranny of the majority, and a tiny majority
That makes it a political problem, not a financial problem.
We can do it and as jobs evaporate we will do what it takes to get there.
Sanders isn't going to be the nominee.
Regulated in terms of held responsible for harming customers (civil court) or directly stealing from them (criminal courts) sure. Regulated in terms of controlled in advance, no
How about regulated for standards?
Him being a clueless socialist... Ya that will help. LolSanders sure would shake things up. I think it would be fascinating watching him take on the Corporate Slumlords. But can he win, is the question. Obviously, the Global Banker-Elites are with Hillary Clinton. Can he overcome that? I have serious doubts he can.
Balance. We clearly don't have that anymore. The Corporate Fatcats are completely out of control. They own our Government, and they don't care about our country. I think Sanders could provide some balance. It really would be fascinating watching him take em on.
Let's say there are 10 things you want to do. I decide I'll let you do five your way, and tell you which five you can do, then you're going to do five my way.
I actually decided all ten, you weren't free for any of them because I chose not only the five that you had to do my way, but I chose the ones I allowed you to do yours.
They are socialist countries because government decides what the people are free to do, and that which they can give, they can take away
However you chose to describe their system, it WORKS and the people in those countries are not seeing the jobs exported, nor do they have to train their immigrant labor that is taking their jobs.
I'll tell you a far worse form of government than socialism; Corporate Crony Oligarchy. They fuck their own people day in and day out and the corporate owned media just ignores it all. And the wealthiest 1% blow all the statistics out fo the water, with the top 20% owning far more than the statistically average 80%. The top 1% alone owns that.
The Middle Class, that is me BTW, are getting reamed, robbed and lied to about it all.
It's going to be time to water the Tree of Liberty if things dont get fixed soon.
It works if liberty's not important to you and you are good with just being a subject of government, sure.
But let's say for a minute liberty doesn't matter to you and you like their system. To conclude that what would work in a country a tiny fraction the number of people and size of their economy with highly homogeneous people with common ethnic, cultural and moral values would work in a country so many times larger and more diverse is just butt ridiculous
Good point. I like the Nordic model, but am unsure if it would work on a large scale. It is possible it could work better on a large scale, but don't think anyone knows.
Scale is certainly a big part of it as we agreed. But the part of the homogeneous people is probably a much larger issue. I work with a lot of Europeans both here and in Europe and I know a lot of Scandinavians, particularly Swedes. And yes, they love their healthcare system. But they share a background, ethnicity, values, attitudes. It's small and they are all behind it in the same way. Look at our campaign now for President, this is a huge, diverse, splintered country. Most people opposed Obamacare, Democrats forced it through by pure guile after Kennedy died.
Scandinavians are virtually universally behind their system, we're completely divided. And government running all that is so absolute. It's ridiculous to conclude what works there would work here or even to believe there is any chance it would. It would just be blunt force one half the country compelling it on the other. Tyranny of the majority, and a tiny majority
I can only disagree with your conclusion. I don't think it is ridiculous to think it could work here, but I don't see how anyone can be that confident it would. We have the largest economy in the world so anything is possible. Another big factor is we spend a lot more on the military. But the size of our economy might cover for that.
I trust the federal government to STOP corporations from exporting jobs, to stop them from corrupting our political system, and to regulate them to not cheat and lie tot he customers
OMG, you've been Berned. Feel behind your ears, it's actually still wet, isn't it? Logic with a socialist is pointless. And I don't know how you realized you and Bernie know that you're right and the field of economics is wrong about free trade, but obviously you do so hey, I concede. You believe your dream world over empirical data, it is what it is
So now you h ave retreated to sarcasm and lame humor.
Thanks for playing.
Do you think economics had been right about free trade?I trust the federal government to STOP corporations from exporting jobs, to stop them from corrupting our political system, and to regulate them to not cheat and lie tot he customers
OMG, you've been Berned. Feel behind your ears, it's actually still wet, isn't it? Logic with a socialist is pointless. And I don't know how you realized you and Bernie know that you're right and the field of economics is wrong about free trade, but obviously you do so hey, I concede. You believe your dream world over empirical data, it is what it is
So now you h ave retreated to sarcasm and lame humor.
Thanks for playing.
Information wasn't getting me anywhere. You know better than the field of economics, how do I refute that blind belief?
Uh oh. It's a set up. He really means "fair trade".Do you think economics had been right about free trade?I trust the federal government to STOP corporations from exporting jobs, to stop them from corrupting our political system, and to regulate them to not cheat and lie tot he customers
OMG, you've been Berned. Feel behind your ears, it's actually still wet, isn't it? Logic with a socialist is pointless. And I don't know how you realized you and Bernie know that you're right and the field of economics is wrong about free trade, but obviously you do so hey, I concede. You believe your dream world over empirical data, it is what it is
So now you h ave retreated to sarcasm and lame humor.
Thanks for playing.
Information wasn't getting me anywhere. You know better than the field of economics, how do I refute that blind belief?
We will do it, true, because we are now a Democracy and no longer a Federal Republic.
But it will be a disaster because a tiny majority forcing government healthcare on the entire country will be a disaster. It already is and you don't see that either.
You feel the Bern, you don't see the facts. And you have no respect for the rights of the minority. But you whaaaant it ...
Do you think economics had been right about free trade?I trust the federal government to STOP corporations from exporting jobs, to stop them from corrupting our political system, and to regulate them to not cheat and lie tot he customers
OMG, you've been Berned. Feel behind your ears, it's actually still wet, isn't it? Logic with a socialist is pointless. And I don't know how you realized you and Bernie know that you're right and the field of economics is wrong about free trade, but obviously you do so hey, I concede. You believe your dream world over empirical data, it is what it is
So now you h ave retreated to sarcasm and lame humor.
Thanks for playing.
Information wasn't getting me anywhere. You know better than the field of economics, how do I refute that blind belief?
Define "craven greed".We will do it, true, because we are now a Democracy and no longer a Federal Republic.
We are still a democratic Republic.
But it will be a disaster because a tiny majority forcing government healthcare on the entire country will be a disaster. It already is and you don't see that either.
I see it is not working as well as it could if BOTH sides had participated in crafting it. But that is all water under the bridge now; we have it and historically no federal funded obligation to the public has ever been rescinded. We can cry about it all day and all year for decades if we want, or we could get a good businessman in charge with the cooperation of Both parties,...oh wait, but the corporations wont cooperate and will stop anyone from changing their theft of the government treasury and tax payer funds because Bendover Conservatives like you will always be there to defend corporations and attack any effort to reign them in as communism and craven greed, when it is EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE..
You feel the Bern, you don't see the facts. And you have no respect for the rights of the minority. But you whaaaant it ...
I see plenty of facts, but you have nothing to rebut with and so you engage in sarcasm instead.
There is no reason to sell off our nation to foreign corporations and our nations enemies
Yeah, thats a great move. Lenin was also disguising his communistic tendencies, from his mentor, marx, in the form of socialist progressive moves in order to fool the people.
Sanders isn't trying to fool anyone, he tells it like it is. Admitting he is a Democratic socialist took balls. I think a lot of Americans can appreciate that kind of honesty and courage. And that admission doesn't frighten me in the least because, if he is elected ,the power of governance will still be shared by two other branches. Frankly, I think Sanders has a shot if the young folks come out and vote.
We will do it, true, because we are now a Democracy and no longer a Federal Republic.
We are still a democratic Republic
But it will be a disaster because a tiny majority forcing government healthcare on the entire country will be a disaster. It already is and you don't see that either.
I see it is not working as well as it could if BOTH sides had participated in crafting it
There is no reason to sell off our nation to foreign corporations and our nations enemies
Define "craven greed".We will do it, true, because we are now a Democracy and no longer a Federal Republic.
We are still a democratic Republic.
But it will be a disaster because a tiny majority forcing government healthcare on the entire country will be a disaster. It already is and you don't see that either.
I see it is not working as well as it could if BOTH sides had participated in crafting it. But that is all water under the bridge now; we have it and historically no federal funded obligation to the public has ever been rescinded. We can cry about it all day and all year for decades if we want, or we could get a good businessman in charge with the cooperation of Both parties,...oh wait, but the corporations wont cooperate and will stop anyone from changing their theft of the government treasury and tax payer funds because Bendover Conservatives like you will always be there to defend corporations and attack any effort to reign them in as communism and craven greed, when it is EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE..
You feel the Bern, you don't see the facts. And you have no respect for the rights of the minority. But you whaaaant it ...
I see plenty of facts, but you have nothing to rebut with and so you engage in sarcasm instead.
There is no reason to sell off our nation to foreign corporations and our nations enemies