I guess if Tramp doesn't want any of the trampers testifying

Wow, who knew there were that many morons in Kentucky?

I hear some are so dumb they vote democrat.
Sure you do, that's why they are at a tRump rally.

Dumbass.

Smart people vote Republican. You should know that by just looking in the mirror.
what's so smart about supporting and lying for a world class ass like trump?
That he is not a Democrat?
Hope your taste outside of politics is better than what you show here Evidently you enjoy having this trump moron in our WH
 
Wow, who knew there were that many morons in Kentucky?

I hear some are so dumb they vote democrat.
Sure you do, that's why they are at a tRump rally.

Dumbass.

Smart people vote Republican. You should know that by just looking in the mirror.
what's so smart about supporting and lying for a world class ass like trump?
Who's lying for him?
 
I hear some are so dumb they vote democrat.
Sure you do, that's why they are at a tRump rally.

Dumbass.

Smart people vote Republican. You should know that by just looking in the mirror.
what's so smart about supporting and lying for a world class ass like trump?
That he is not a Democrat?
Hope your taste outside of politics is better than what you show here Evidently you enjoy having this trump moron in our WH
Actually I do-better than the last two presidents
 
Wow, who knew there were that many morons in Kentucky?

I hear some are so dumb they vote democrat.
Sure you do, that's why they are at a tRump rally.

Dumbass.

Smart people vote Republican. You should know that by just looking in the mirror.
what's so smart about supporting and lying for a world class ass like trump?
Who's lying for him?
Your question should have been ,,,who isn't ? The pos Giuliani for one and all the republican scum in the senate who lie by omission,afraid to admit their leader should be kicked out of the WH
 
I hear some are so dumb they vote democrat.
Sure you do, that's why they are at a tRump rally.

Dumbass.

Smart people vote Republican. You should know that by just looking in the mirror.
what's so smart about supporting and lying for a world class ass like trump?
Who's lying for him?
Your question should have been ,,,who isn't ? The pos Giuliani for one and all the republican scum in the senate who lie by omission,afraid to admit their leader should be kicked out of the WH
So you're conflating elected officials with ordinary voters. Can you not tell the difference?
 
I hear some are so dumb they vote democrat.
Sure you do, that's why they are at a tRump rally.

Dumbass.

Smart people vote Republican. You should know that by just looking in the mirror.
what's so smart about supporting and lying for a world class ass like trump?
Who's lying for him?
Your question should have been ,,,who isn't ? The pos Giuliani for one and all the republican scum in the senate who lie by omission,afraid to admit their leader should be kicked out of the WH
No voted out-you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.
 
you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.

Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
 
you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.

Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.
 
you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.

Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
 
you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.

Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?
 
you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.

Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
 
you still believe in democracy right? Not the rules my way by Adam shifty Schiff.

Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?
 
we will have to go by the only people that we have. He is the obstructionist.

He is hiding everything, but who cares if the stock market if up!! Not the republican's who sh.t on the US Constitution, and not the tramper who also sh.t on it.

The Democrats are the party of honesty, and dedication to the US Constitution. What happened to the Republican party, to hell they went.

When money and Tramp become their God, instead of doing what is right and decent, they will not last long, the truth always has a way of coming out.

"The Democrats are the party of honesty, and dedication to the US Constitution."

:abgg2q.jpg::auiqs.jpg::badgrin::disbelief::disagree::iyfyus.jpg::laughing0301::laugh2::laugh::lmao::muahaha::puhleeze::th_believecrap::uhh::wtf:
 
Funny to see Trumpublicans whine about the Rules that were adopted from the Republican run investigations into Obama and the Impeachment inquiry into Clinton. It's like they got their talking points from the Democrats in 2015, only they are much better at messaging their talking points with their propaganda arm at Faux News and the other fake news outlets like Gateway, Bretphart PJ media......
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
 
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
Never. The best outcome of this for all concerned is to just let the dems present the facts they have learned before Christmas, and let McConnell have a one day "trial" following by a same day vote to not remove Trump. And get on with it.

Not that there's no importance in showing Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine and abused his office. But that's only going to affect maybe 2% in battleground states and it will energize Trump's base.
 
Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
Never. The best outcome of this for all concerned is to just let the dems present the facts they have learned before Christmas, and let McConnell have a one day "trial" following by a same day vote to not remove Trump. And get on with it.

Not that there's no importance in showing Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine and abused his office. But that's only going to affect maybe 2% in battleground states and it will energize Trump's base.

Never is too absolute. I think the courts are going to expedite the matter of the subpoenas the House has issued this term. Then of course they will be getting a chance to review all the evidence Mueller gathered too. But probably not before Christmas.
 
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
Never. The best outcome of this for all concerned is to just let the dems present the facts they have learned before Christmas, and let McConnell have a one day "trial" following by a same day vote to not remove Trump. And get on with it.

Not that there's no importance in showing Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine and abused his office. But that's only going to affect maybe 2% in battleground states and it will energize Trump's base.

Never is too absolute. I think the courts are going to expedite the matter of the subpoenas the House has issued this term. Then of course they will be getting a chance to review all the evidence Mueller gathered too. But probably not before Christmas.
I don't see an upside for the dems in prolonging this to get more evidence.

The dems have to present a vision of where they want the country to go economically, and less importantly in for policy.

Personally, I find the debt levels terrifying for my child, and think everyone else should too. The other goper candidates in 16 all mentioned this as an issue. Trump views default and renegotiation a valid strategy.

And, Trump will support Facebook. Facebook should be subject to regulation the same as any other form of media transmission. Anyone broadcasting on radio or TV has to comply with restrictions. NBC may not be liable for known lies locally broadcast on bandwidth assigned to it, but it can have it's bandwidth taken away. Or, the local broadcaster may be removed from the medium.
 
They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
Never. The best outcome of this for all concerned is to just let the dems present the facts they have learned before Christmas, and let McConnell have a one day "trial" following by a same day vote to not remove Trump. And get on with it.

Not that there's no importance in showing Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine and abused his office. But that's only going to affect maybe 2% in battleground states and it will energize Trump's base.

Never is too absolute. I think the courts are going to expedite the matter of the subpoenas the House has issued this term. Then of course they will be getting a chance to review all the evidence Mueller gathered too. But probably not before Christmas.
I don't see an upside for the dems in prolonging this to get more evidence.

The dems have to present a vision of where they want the country to go economically, and less importantly in for policy.

Personally, I find the debt levels terrifying for my child, and think everyone else should too. The other goper candidates in 16 all mentioned this as an issue. Trump views default and renegotiation a valid strategy.

And, Trump will support Facebook. Facebook should be subject to regulation the same as any other form of media transmission. Anyone broadcasting on radio or TV has to comply with restrictions. NBC may not be liable for known lies locally broadcast on bandwidth assigned to it, but it can have it's bandwidth taken away. Or, the local broadcaster may be removed from the medium.

I guess I'm being cynical. Weaponizing political investigations worked in 2016. Taking the high road didn't. But I feel dirty, like a Trumpublican now.

Fakebook and the information war is a .... broad topic.
 
Sorry, not a rep or trump supporter-just a dem nut cruncher-they deserve it-but not Hillary-she suffered enough.

Doesn't change the fact that the Democrats in the House are operating under the very same rules Republicans used in the investigations of Obama and the Impeachment of Clinton.

So basically your nut crunch tactic is just to lob the same lies the Trumpublicans are spreading?
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
Did not see the 2011 hearings-those should have been transparent too. This is not about dems and reps, this is about the American people and THEIR right to have open government. All should be open including white house info
 
Does not change the fact that dems are NOT transparent-isn't that more important than your revenge quest?

They are no less transparent than the Republicans were when they were trying to extract their revenge on Obama with endless investigations. Trumpublicans don't want a level playing field.
Forget the past-I was not there then, and this is NOW. Transparency for EVERYBODY-YES OR NO?

Right, forget history since 2011 and the horrendous way those House Republicans treated the last Democrat President. So you think criminal investigations need to be transparent and open to the public during the evidence gathering phase of the investigations? (You must be a criminal defense lawyer.) Republican members of the House are on the Committees taking the depositions and testimony, so it is transparent to those Republicans. When will the WH become transparent, stop obstructing Congress and let their people answer the subpoenas?
Never. The best outcome of this for all concerned is to just let the dems present the facts they have learned before Christmas, and let McConnell have a one day "trial" following by a same day vote to not remove Trump. And get on with it.

Not that there's no importance in showing Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine and abused his office. But that's only going to affect maybe 2% in battleground states and it will energize Trump's base.

Never is too absolute. I think the courts are going to expedite the matter of the subpoenas the House has issued this term. Then of course they will be getting a chance to review all the evidence Mueller gathered too. But probably not before Christmas.
Mueller stuff is a dead end.
 

Forum List

Back
Top