Boss
Take a Memo:
I think that's a fair question, and I guess the answer is "it's all about politics", and politics is image.
Maybe it's also about submission, where the vanquished hands it to the victor. Showbiz.
The fact remains, though, that he knew how important his endorsement would be in terms of image and momentum, and he chose to vote "present".
No, he actually did what any principled person should have done. He gave a brilliant speech that focused on the key aspects of the party and platform. He made his case for why people should vote their conscience and support who they think will best uphold our constitutional values.... is that now seen as "anti-Trump" and what does that say about Trump?
He did exactly the same as Ronald Reagan did in 1976 and threw his support to the Republican party without officially endorsing the nominee. I have absolutely no problem with his speech or how he handled it, and I think history will show that he did the right thing. I fully believe, had he slobbered all over Trump like Christie and some of the others, he would have come across as "sucking up" and his critics would be pointing that out for all to see today.