I was wrong... the health of the mother is not valid for an abortion.

[Cecilie1200]

You didn't dispute anything I said so what is it that you think I haven't learned?

It's been almost 50 years now. Just think how many lives could have been saved in that amount of time if we had only been willing to address the reasons many women abort?

It's all good with you for this to continue another 50?

Why?

Your premise is, to its very roots, bullshit.

You're trying to sell extreme left wrong-wing Socialist polices as the cure for abortion—policies which history has proven only increase the very suffering that they purport to intend to mitigate or eliminate.

The only real cure for abortion, is to recognize it for what it is—the cold-blooded murder of an innocent human being; and for our criminal justice system to treat it exactly the same as it would treat any other deliberate murder of an innocent child. Trying to bribe would-be child-murderers with the false promises of Socialism is no solution at all.

Isn't it odd that they never notice that we've greatly increased social programs over the years, and yet abortions haven't stopped?

 

[pknopp]

No, I already addressed that. It has nothing to do with life but with politics. That's sad.

Wrong.

Let me lay it out for you.

It has to do with FACTS, TRUTH and the CONSTITUTION.

I thought that would be the common ground between all of us.

Crazy, unrealistic, wishful thinking. . . I know.

According to the Supreme Court the Constitution grants a right to privacy.

That isn't going to change.....

1. The Supreme Court is not fucking infallible.

2. The Supreme Court Can and Has reversed its decisions before.

3. Nobody has the right to violate the rights of a child and then HIDE the violation behind a so called right to privacy.

4. Our Basic human rights are not fucking "granted" to us by the fucking Costitution.

Did you skip a lot of civics and history classes (as well as biology) in school?

You didn't dispute anything I said so what is it that you think I haven't learned?

It's been almost 50 years now. Just think how many lives could have been saved in that amount of time if we had only been willing to address the reasons many women abort?

It's all good with you for this to continue another 50?

Why?

Because dumb ass... for as long ad abortion remains legal, convenient, accepted, tolerated, defended or shrugged off by the likes of YOU. . .

THERE WILL NEVER be enough that ANY OF US COULD EVER DO "for women" that will EVER SECURE THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILDREN who will still FACE being aborted.

Caring more for women will NOT right that wrong.

Ask any fucking pro abort to make a deal with you.

Offer them free healthcare for life, a free education, free housing. . . ANYTHING. . .In exchange for them to agree to ban abortions and secure the rights of children in the womb.

See how few takers you will ever get.

So much for your fucking red herring.

Abortion being legal has nothing to do with me. Being that you are unable to answer my questions you have to call me names and try and make it about me though.

It's sad. It's too bad you won't support saving at least some of the lives aborted every year (and yes, that was directed at you).

 

[pknopp]

You didn't dispute anything I said so what is it that you think I haven't learned?

It's been almost 50 years now. Just think how many lives could have been saved in that amount of time if we had only been willing to address the reasons many women abort?

It's all good with you for this to continue another 50?

Why?

Your premise is, to its very roots, bullshit.

You're trying to sell extreme left wrong-wing Socialist polices as the cure for abortion—policies which history has proven only increase the very suffering that they purport to intend to mitigate or eliminate.

The only real cure for abortion, is to recognize it for what it is—the cold-blooded murder of an innocent human being; and for our criminal justice system to treat it exactly the same as it would treat any other deliberate murder of an innocent child. Trying to bribe would-be child-murderers with the false promises of Socialism is no solution at all.

It isn't going to happen. You know that but the hatred just drips from your post.

Pro-life my ass.

 

[pknopp]

You didn't dispute anything I said so what is it that you think I haven't learned?

It's been almost 50 years now. Just think how many lives could have been saved in that amount of time if we had only been willing to address the reasons many women abort?

It's all good with you for this to continue another 50?

Why?

Your premise is, to its very roots, bullshit.

You're trying to sell extreme left wrong-wing Socialist polices as the cure for abortion—policies which history has proven only increase the very suffering that they purport to intend to mitigate or eliminate.

The only real cure for abortion, is to recognize it for what it is—the cold-blooded murder of an innocent human being; and for our criminal justice system to treat it exactly the same as it would treat any other deliberate murder of an innocent child. Trying to bribe would-be child-murderers with the false promises of Socialism is no solution at all.

Isn't it odd that they never notice that we've greatly increased social programs over the years, and yet abortions haven't stopped?

They have lessened.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It isn't going to happen. You know that but the hatred just drips from your post.

Someone who defends the cold-blooded murder of innocent children is pointing a finger at me, and accusing me of “hatred”.

There is no deeper hatred, than that which you express every time you try to dehumanize the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings,and deny them their right to life itself.

 

[pknopp]

It isn't going to happen. You know that but the hatred just drips from your post.

Someone who defends the cold-blooded murder of innocent children is pointing a finger at me, and accusing me of “hatred”.

There is no deeper hatred, than that which you express every time you try to dehumanize the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings,and deny them their right to life itself.

View attachment 312097

I'm pro-life and support ideas that would help a woman keep her baby......

You.....not so much.

 

[Grace Is Stoked]

As a female I personally could never have a willful, voluntary abortion. A miscarriage is a type of natural abortion and are much more frequent than people think, but I am speaking about an abortion as a form of birth control.

 

[Coyote]

You didn't dispute anything I said so what is it that you think I haven't learned?

It's been almost 50 years now. Just think how many lives could have been saved in that amount of time if we had only been willing to address the reasons many women abort?

It's all good with you for this to continue another 50?

Why?

Your premise is, to its very roots, bullshit.

You're trying to sell extreme left wrong-wing Socialist polices as the cure for abortion—policies which history has proven only increase the very suffering that they purport to intend to mitigate or eliminate.

The only real cure for abortion, is to recognize it for what it is—the cold-blooded murder of an innocent human being; and for our criminal justice system to treat it exactly the same as it would treat any other deliberate murder of an innocent child. Trying to bribe would-be child-murderers with the false promises of Socialism is no solution at all.

Isn't it odd that they never notice that we've greatly increased social programs over the years, and yet abortions haven't stopped?

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

 

[Chuz Life]

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

 

[Coyote]

(3wed

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

So you you have zero interest in reducing abortion or actually helping children?

And you DO realize that the only way your position can be consistent is to have no exceptions on abortion?

 

[pknopp]

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

We kill kids by the thousands every year with our bombs.

 

[Chuz Life]

(3wed

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

So you you have zero interest in reducing abortion or actually helping children?

And you DO realize that the only way your position can be consistent is to have no exceptions on abortion?

Strike 1 and strike 2. . . .

Wanna go for 3?

 

[Chuz Life]

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

We kill kids by the thousands every year with our bombs.

Let's say you are right about that.

Answer the question.

How does that fact make LEGALIZED ABORTION more acceptable to you?

 

[pknopp]

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

We kill kids by the thousands every year with our bombs.

Let's say you are right about that.

Answer the question.

How does that fact make LEGALIZED ABORTION more acceptable to you?

If your only rebuttal is dishonesty there is no where to go.

I'm pro-life but you know that.

 

[Chuz Life]

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

We kill kids by the thousands every year with our bombs.

Let's say you are right about that.

Answer the question.

How does that fact make LEGALIZED ABORTION more acceptable to you?

If your only rebuttal is dishonesty there is no where to go.

I'm pro-life but you know that.

There is nothing dishonest about asking a direct question which you still have yet to answer.

 

[Jackson]

Watching Schumer threaten SCOTUS judges if they rule against Roe VS Wade made me wonder about my own knowledge regarding my position... abortion OK only in case of health of money, rape or incest.
I am wrong!
Even in 1981, former Surgeon General of the United States Dr. C. Everett Koop said, “The fact of the matter is that abortion as a necessity to save the life of the mother is so rare as to be nonexistent.”

But as former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino has affirmed on the record:
During my time at Albany Medical Center I managed hundreds of such cases by “terminating” pregnancies to save mother’s lives. In all those cases, the number of unborn children that I had to deliberately kill was zero.
What Percentage of Abortions Are Medically Necessary?

But the biased MSM has never shared that with us.
Consequently since 1973 over 61,781,054 lives were destroyed.
Think about that...what baby among those 62 million could have discovered cures for cancer? Or made other fantastic contributions...all because a woman wasn't responsible enough.
Number of Abortions in US & Worldwide - Number of abortions since 1973

Just consider that: 46% of all abortions were performed on women who had one or more abortions before!
Think about it... There is an excuse for first timers... but 2nd, or 3 or more previous abortions?

Planned Parenthood Turns 99 Today: Has Killed 7 Million Babies in Abortions

Are you a male or female, I bet a male.

It doesn't make any difference. Abortion certainly is cruel and unusual punishment for an innocent baby.

 

[pknopp]

It is odd that they never notice the abortion rate has decreased to it’s lowest rate since it was legalized.

Making it illegal didn’t stop it them. Why do you think it would now?

Do you always INTENTIONALLY miss the obvious?

It sure appears that you do.

Banning abortion is NOT only about reducing the numbers of abortions. Reducing the number of abortions is not even the PRIMARY reason for banning abortions.

The primary reason for banning abortions is because CHILDREN have a right to the "Equal Protections of our Laws."

That's it! Period. End Stop!

We get that you are too fucking ignorant, too steeped in denial or to callous to CARE about the rights of the children being killed. . . but your ignorance is NOT going to discourage those who are intellectually HONEST enough to accept and acknowledge the facts that YOU obviously wish we would ignore.

We kill kids by the thousands every year with our bombs.

Let's say you are right about that.

Answer the question.

How does that fact make LEGALIZED ABORTION more acceptable to you?

If your only rebuttal is dishonesty there is no where to go.

I'm pro-life but you know that.

There is nothing dishonest about asking a direct question which you still have yet to answer.

I am unable to answer a dishonest question.

 

[Jackson]

Watching Schumer threaten SCOTUS judges if they rule against Roe VS Wade made me wonder about my own knowledge regarding my position... abortion OK only in case of health of money, rape or incest.
I am wrong!
Even in 1981, former Surgeon General of the United States Dr. C. Everett Koop said, “The fact of the matter is that abortion as a necessity to save the life of the mother is so rare as to be nonexistent.”

But as former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino has affirmed on the record:
During my time at Albany Medical Center I managed hundreds of such cases by “terminating” pregnancies to save mother’s lives. In all those cases, the number of unborn children that I had to deliberately kill was zero.
What Percentage of Abortions Are Medically Necessary?

But the biased MSM has never shared that with us.
Consequently since 1973 over 61,781,054 lives were destroyed.
Think about that...what baby among those 62 million could have discovered cures for cancer? Or made other fantastic contributions...all because a woman wasn't responsible enough.
Number of Abortions in US & Worldwide - Number of abortions since 1973

Just consider that: 46% of all abortions were performed on women who had one or more abortions before!
Think about it... There is an excuse for first timers... but 2nd, or 3 or more previous abortions?

Planned Parenthood Turns 99 Today: Has Killed 7 Million Babies in Abortions

Are you a male or female, I bet a male.

I was originally ok with abortions in case of mother's health, rape or incest, based on the statistics, the murder of a person
that was NOT going to affect a woman's health is wrong.
Then I find out that really DUMB women who already had a 2nd or 3rd abortion?
That is shear murder because the women couldn't say NO!
It was evidently OK for a few moments of pleasure to terminate an especially innocent baby.
That makes my sex irrelevant.
But what is more relevant is you approve of dumb women who have already had abortions? That is shear stupidity on theirs and your part!

To me a fertilized egg is not yet a human being, any more than a blueprint is a house. A baby at birth is a person and has the right to live. Somewhere between those two extremes is a line where abortions (except in very rare cases) should be banned. I'm not sure where that line is but it is our brains that make us different from any other animal, a heart is just not the same. Once that brain truly begins to function, that is a person. IMHO of course.

So, just what is that thing that's growing in your body, a U Haul? A fertilized egg is a human. Not a truck, dog or anything but a baby growing inside of you. Now if you are such a selfish person and don't want to carry this child to term or raise a child, then BE RESPONSIBLE AND TAKE THE PILL!!!!!!!! oR HAVE YOURSELF FIXED OR TAKE YOUR OWN LIFE, NOT THAT OF AN INNOCENT.

 

[Jackson]

Watching Schumer threaten SCOTUS judges if they rule against Roe VS Wade made me wonder about my own knowledge regarding my position... abortion OK only in case of health of money, rape or incest.
I am wrong!
Even in 1981, former Surgeon General of the United States Dr. C. Everett Koop said, “The fact of the matter is that abortion as a necessity to save the life of the mother is so rare as to be nonexistent.”

But as former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino has affirmed on the record:
During my time at Albany Medical Center I managed hundreds of such cases by “terminating” pregnancies to save mother’s lives. In all those cases, the number of unborn children that I had to deliberately kill was zero.
What Percentage of Abortions Are Medically Necessary?

But the biased MSM has never shared that with us.
Consequently since 1973 over 61,781,054 lives were destroyed.
Think about that...what baby among those 62 million could have discovered cures for cancer? Or made other fantastic contributions...all because a woman wasn't responsible enough.
Number of Abortions in US & Worldwide - Number of abortions since 1973

Just consider that: 46% of all abortions were performed on women who had one or more abortions before!
Think about it... There is an excuse for first timers... but 2nd, or 3 or more previous abortions?

Planned Parenthood Turns 99 Today: Has Killed 7 Million Babies in Abortions

Are you a male or female, I bet a male.

Watching Schumer threaten SCOTUS judges if they rule against Roe VS Wade made me wonder about my own knowledge regarding my position... abortion OK only in case of health of money, rape or incest.
I am wrong!
Even in 1981, former Surgeon General of the United States Dr. C. Everett Koop said, “The fact of the matter is that abortion as a necessity to save the life of the mother is so rare as to be nonexistent.”

But as former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino has affirmed on the record:
During my time at Albany Medical Center I managed hundreds of such cases by “terminating” pregnancies to save mother’s lives. In all those cases, the number of unborn children that I had to deliberately kill was zero.
What Percentage of Abortions Are Medically Necessary?

But the biased MSM has never shared that with us.
Consequently since 1973 over 61,781,054 lives were destroyed.
Think about that...what baby among those 62 million could have discovered cures for cancer? Or made other fantastic contributions...all because a woman wasn't responsible enough.
Number of Abortions in US & Worldwide - Number of abortions since 1973

Just consider that: 46% of all abortions were performed on women who had one or more abortions before!
Think about it... There is an excuse for first timers... but 2nd, or 3 or more previous abortions?

Planned Parenthood Turns 99 Today: Has Killed 7 Million Babies in Abortions

Are you a male or female, I bet a male.

WHY WOULD YOU GUESS THAT POSTER IS MALE? only they HAVE CONSCIENCES? I happen to be a woman and would never ever have an abortion because I would not be able to live with myself for taking the life of a baby. It boggles my mind to think that anyone is so incredibly selfish to do so.

 

[DOTR]

Watching Schumer threaten SCOTUS judges if they rule against Roe VS Wade made me wonder about my own knowledge regarding my position... abortion OK only in case of health of money, rape or incest.
I am wrong!
Even in 1981, former Surgeon General of the United States Dr. C. Everett Koop said, “The fact of the matter is that abortion as a necessity to save the life of the mother is so rare as to be nonexistent.”

But as former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino has affirmed on the record:
During my time at Albany Medical Center I managed hundreds of such cases by “terminating” pregnancies to save mother’s lives. In all those cases, the number of unborn children that I had to deliberately kill was zero.
What Percentage of Abortions Are Medically Necessary?

But the biased MSM has never shared that with us.
Consequently since 1973 over 61,781,054 lives were destroyed.
Think about that...what baby among those 62 million could have discovered cures for cancer? Or made other fantastic contributions...all because a woman wasn't responsible enough.
Number of Abortions in US & Worldwide - Number of abortions since 1973

Just consider that: 46% of all abortions were performed on women who had one or more abortions before!
Think about it... There is an excuse for first timers... but 2nd, or 3 or more previous abortions?

Planned Parenthood Turns 99 Today: Has Killed 7 Million Babies in Abortions

Welcome to humanity.