Asclepias
Diamond Member
- Aug 3, 2013
- 114,820
- 18,670
The taser constituted a non lethal weapon even if he could have magically recharged it that fast.it was a Taser or in other words a nonlethal weapon that is only capable of firing one time. The taser had been fired and missed by a wide margin. The subject then dropped the taser and ran.The way this has been presented to me is it the guy was running off with a weapon. I've heard new facts that he already fired that weapon. If that's the case and the cops shot him anyway, you have a good point.The cops shot a guy in the back. It was the cops who prevented the court from deciding the guilt or innocence of this man.And it is not the job of black people to render a judgment as the judge on the street and decide that they must resist arrest and get away.You obviously misunderstood what you just quoted. I was speaking to someone else and telling them its not their job or the cops job to render a decision on guilt or innocence but nice try anyway.EXACTLY!!!!Let the court decide that not your or the cops.
DO NOT RESIST ARREST!!!!
LET THE FUCKING COURTS DECIDE!!!!
It's like talking to a fucking brick wall.
.
Let the court decide.
That's what's happening. These guys are not letting the court decide, they're blaming the cops.
I have demonstrated to everyone this logical flaw that you're running around with.
Again, talking to a brick wall.
.
Cops cannot let people run off a deadly weapons when that person has done so while resisting arrest. Far too many other people get hurt when that happens.
.
Tell me at what point was this cop ever in mortal danger?
I is a naive person-----do not own a taser. Can't they be recharged? The taser constituted a weapon in the hands of a fugging criminal who was so depraved that he resisted a lawful arrest