Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lobbing missiles from aircraft carriers is not a deceleration of war, and requires no congressional action or approval.
Exactly.
That's what I read here
.
Lobbing missiles from aircraft carriers is not a deceleration of war, and requires no congressional action or approval.
Exactly.
That's what I read here
.
The Ministry of Truth, Ministry of Peace and Ministry of Love all agree with this interpretation.
The doublethink initiative could not possibly be more successful.
One country bombing another country is of course not an act of war.
It is an act of peace...and a humanitarian mission as well.
So what happened to all the hoopla Republicans were demanding not too long ago that Obama must take some action in Syria? Is that when they were for something before they were against it? Seems like it.
Either you want him to take action or you don't - but quit flip-flopping, already.
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)A growing chorus of Republican lawmakers are demanding that President Obama take some action in Syria so that they can attack whatever action he took in Syria.
Appearing on CBSs Face the Nation on Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) laid out the situation in stark terms: The time for President Obama to do something in Syria that we can eviscerate him for is long overdue.
Arguing that there are a variety of options available to Mr. Obama for dealing with Syria, Sen. Graham said, The President needs to choose one of those options so that we can immediately identify it as a catastrophic choice and demand that he be impeached.
Republicans: Obama Must Take Action in Syria So We Can Criticize Action He Took in Syria : The New Yorker
Hmmmm Using a satire article as a basis for your position?
Interesting..
Do you relay on Jon Stewart and Colbert also?
How about "The Onion"?
President Obama opened his mouth and drew a line in the sand...
Now they have crossed it and slapped him in the face....
He now has no Idea what to do so he will lay it on congress and hope to blame the Republicans for anything that goes wrong....
So what happened to all the hoopla Republicans were demanding not too long ago that Obama must take some action in Syria? Is that when they were for something before they were against it? Seems like it.
Either you want him to take action or you don't - but quit flip-flopping, already.
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)A growing chorus of Republican lawmakers are demanding that President Obama take some action in Syria so that they can attack whatever action he took in Syria.
Appearing on CBSs Face the Nation on Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) laid out the situation in stark terms: The time for President Obama to do something in Syria that we can eviscerate him for is long overdue.
Arguing that there are a variety of options available to Mr. Obama for dealing with Syria, Sen. Graham said, The President needs to choose one of those options so that we can immediately identify it as a catastrophic choice and demand that he be impeached.
Republicans: Obama Must Take Action in Syria So We Can Criticize Action He Took in Syria : The New Yorker
Hmmmm Using a satire article as a basis for your position?
Interesting..
Do you relay on Jon Stewart and Colbert also?
How about "The Onion"?
I thought it got the point across, as well as the intent from the right, in a jovial manner. But, please don't tell me that you were not aware of the GOP pushing Obama to do something since way back, because I would have a hard time believing that.
You want more serious sources?
Senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham issued a joint statement today urging the Obama administration to act on Syria. f requested by the Syrian National Council and the Free Syrian Army, the United States should help organize an international effort to protect civilian population centers in Syria through airstrikes on Assads forces," they write. "To be clear: This will first require the United States and our partners to suppress the Syrian regimes air defenses in at least part of the country."
Senators Urge Obama to Strike Assad's Forces | The Weekly Standard
House Speaker John Boehners office got advanced warning Thursday of the announcement from the White House, but his office didnt pass judgement on his strategy. It only said its long past time to bring the Assad regimes bloodshed in Syria to an end.
GOP to Obama on Syria: Where you been? - Jake Sherman - POLITICO.com
Your attempt to deflect by making it seem like I was fabricating BS is even more interesting.
President Obama opened his mouth and drew a line in the sand...
Now they have crossed it and slapped him in the face....
He now has no Idea what to do so he will lay it on congress and hope to blame the Republicans for anything that goes wrong....
Weren't they the ones that were pleading Obama to do something? Are they flip-flopping now?
Oh, we get it, as soon as Obama is for something, it's time for the GOP to be against it.
Gotcha!
Senators Urge Obama to Strike Assad's Forces | The Weekly Standard
Thousands of people have already died in Syria. Apparently, this never had anything meaning until everyone discovers that chemical weapon was going to be used.
That begs the question....
Where did the Chemical Weapons come from?
Perhaps Saddam's stash?
Just apply the conservative view of Reagan's 1986 bombing of Libya, unauthorized,
and then turn it upside down, because a Democrat is president,
and there you have the conservative opinion of an Obama bombing of Syria without authorization from Congress.
Libya was behind an attack on the US, and he retaliated.
Syria attacked the US when ...
That's the cue for your answer, BTW.
Because NOW we have principles, scumbag dupe...
Because NOW we have principles, scumbag dupe...
Just apply the conservative view of Reagan's 1986 bombing of Libya, unauthorized,
and then turn it upside down, because a Democrat is president,
and there you have the conservative opinion of an Obama bombing of Syria without authorization from Congress.
Just apply the conservative view of Reagan's 1986 bombing of Libya, unauthorized,
and then turn it upside down, because a Democrat is president,
and there you have the conservative opinion of an Obama bombing of Syria without authorization from Congress.
Libya was behind an attack on the US, and he retaliated.
Syria attacked the US when ...
That's the cue for your answer, BTW.
Really? lol
This will pin down the hypocrites LOL
Lobbing missiles from aircraft carriers is not a deceleration of war, and requires no congressional action or approval.
So, would you be perfectly happy with some country lobbing a few bombs in the middle of your town? With impunity and no accountability?
