Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #181
So what your saying is that this is the line in the sand that they make their stand on? Good griefThe issue is a sanctuary state, and yes, they do flock to sanctuary states for......sanctuary.Homelessness is a problem throughout the United States; I've not seen a study to prove CA has more per capita than other states.
The issue is not local politics, or of the State of CA's governance. It is the fault of The Congress which has not engaged in honest debates to reduce the numbers of this nationwide malady.
The War on Drugs is a failure, Mental health is not funded at a level necessary; thus the serious mentally ill end up in jails and prisons or left on the streets.
Drug addicts and alcoholics spend more time in jail than in treatment, they too add to the problem which cries for a solution, yet The Congress walks down the sidewalk and steps over those sleeping in doorways (metaphorically).
Gotta have a little common sense to figure these things out..
And your side of the aisle claims to be Christian and steps over the sleeping homeless without a thought. The issue is the failure of Congress, the bigotry of people like you, and for the last 3 years Trump's hate and fear rhetoric which created Sanctuary Cities and States.
Empathy is not only a word, it is a moral value, and something too many in power, and those who put them in power, don't have.
Yep, more BS....what a shock.
A look at San Francisco’s status as a sanctuary city – The Mercury News
Maybe you should read your link. My experience, when ICE was INS, and we had an undocumented person in our jail, we would call INS and rarely get a response.
Thus the City and the County paid for the board and care while awaiting trial in jail, an attorney (usually the PD), a trial, a probation report and incarceration and a period of Probation; not a penny spent enforcing on any of these costs by the Federal Government.
If they were more consistent with the oversight, it could have been believable.
Kinda sad about Kathryn Steinle, isn't it?
The cost was one factor, ethics another. Using Kathryn Steinle as a prop is despicable, not that I'm surprised coming from you.