If I was Harris, this would be my opening statement tonight at the Debate

[Missourian]

If you are supporting Trump, YOU are uninformed.

Yet I know the debate tonight will have no opening statements and the OP doesn't.

Once again, your opinions and reality are disjoint sets.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You really do not know the facts do you?

She was never "in control" of the border. She was put in that position to get information about how, why, and to what extent other countries were involved in the border crisis issue but she was never IN CHARGE of anything, meaning that no blame can be placed on her. I already supplied two links to this information previously.

and by the way, she never used a teleprompter when she was Attorney General for 15 years and was successful at prosecuting the law. What makes you think that she can't do it now?

By the way, why didn't you address the facts given in the OP?

Nope. Cackling Kammie is the border czar and she failed miserably.

 

[Luckyone]

Nope. Cackling Kammie is the border czar and she failed miserably.

If you say so, it must be true........................in the fantasy world you live in. Enjoy it...........while you can!

 

[Donald H]

The winner of the debate will be decided by the Americans who see and hear it. Kamala has already lost. No facts she can present will be accepted when they are opposing Trump's half truths and comedy routine lies.

Fwiw, Trump won the debate!

 

[bendog]

Mr. Trump, let me begin by stating a few FACTS about you.

In 2016, you made the following 2 statements:

1) "I alone can fix it"
2) "I will hire only the best people for the job"

And yet, 1) you made 104 campaign promises and you were only able to fulfill 24 of them, in spite of the fact that for the first two years of your presidency, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate. As such, your statement about "I alone can fix it" has proven to be untrue.

and 2) you had the biggest turnover in the history of U.S. presidents, with 85% of the people you picked either getting fired or leaving you. Firing them, meant they did not turn out to be the best and them leaving meaning those "best people" did not think you were doing a good job or not following your oath of office to defend the laws and the Constitution of the United States. This means that your statement about hiring the best was also untrue and the fact so many left you, means that your statement about "I alone can fix it" was also false.

In 2020, you made the accusation that the election was stolen and even though this contention was taken to court on over 60 occasions, it was never proven that any election fraud occurred. Your own Attorney General (Barr) said it wasn't true and even the Supreme Court refused to even look at the accusation saying "there are insufficient facts to have us even consider it". In spite of all that, you stimulated and supported a protest at the Capitol that turned into a potential insurrection. You even asked VP Pence to do something illegal of not confirming the election results. He refused and you said "I made a mistake in choosing Pence to be my VP", in addition you publicly defended those rioters that wanted to "hang Pence".

It has been proven that you did not handle the Covid pandemic well. You delayed the response to it and defunded the entities that handle pandemics and took their power away from them. It has been shown that your handling of the pandemic caused the unnecessary deaths of over 200,000 Americans.

All of the above, show you to be incompetent to be president again.

The above is what I think that Harris should start the debate tonight. All of the above are facts. No accusations or insults, just facts.

You're cheating with the hair.

 

[BackAgain]

I think I pretty well own the discussions in which I choose to take part.

And so that is your contribution to showing it's so!

Your thinking is skewed. You actually imagine you have any room temperature IQ. Unless the temperature is taken in a room lowered to near absolute zero.

 

[Harry Dresden]

WOW, truly an imbecile that was Attorney General for 15 years and was reelected twice. I guess Trump could win if that the case. After all, he has proven to be an imbecile himself and if the people of California were willing to reelect an imbecile twice, why couldn't that happen with Trump?

she was only AG of cal 6 years....and California has elected many imbeciles over the last 30 years....she aint the only one....

 

[Luckyone]

she was only AG of cal 6 years....and California has elected many imbeciles over the last 30 years....she aint the only one....

Great explanation, thanks!

 

[JohnDB]

I am not going to repeat the answer I gave you. I was clear about my thoughts.

I understand that you may support Kamala. That's all well and good. I really don't care one way or another.
From a practical standpoint of the tiny group of undecided or ever changing middle....it matters.

That's why I'm saying what I've said.

Energizing the base is important in an election....but you have to win over the center if you expect to win the election. And since Kamala's morality is not seen as higher than Trump's and possibly lower....she needs to stay away from questions of morality.

She also has to separate herself from Biden as a unique ideologue with fresh ideas. That's not happening either with one look at her platform which just got posted. It's more of Joe's agenda just repackaged.

Winning Elections is rather boring. It takes a special formula for success and you either can follow it and win or try to set new ground and lose. So far....Harris has not followed the formula. Trump has had 12 years of a head start on her and a successful campaign against a Clinton.

She's had a severely short campaign with no successful primary. All her past problems have not been dealt with.

Trump is not invulnerable or even that great at debate. But he is still much more experienced and savvy than she is at the moment regardless of histories.

 

[Luckyone]

I understand that you may support Kamala. That's all well and good. I really don't care one way or another.
From a practical standpoint of the tiny group of undecided or ever changing middle....it matters.

That's why I'm saying what I've said.

Energizing the base is important in an election....but you have to win over the center if you expect to win the election. And since Kamala's morality is not seen as higher than Trump's and possibly lower....she needs to stay away from questions of morality.

No one's morality can be lower than Trump's but what morality are you criticizing in Kamala? To my knowledge, she has been a highly moral person. What do you know that I do not know?

She also has to separate herself from Biden as a unique ideologue with fresh ideas. That's not happening either with one look at her platform which just got posted. It's more of Joe's agenda just repackaged.

If Biden was not losing his cognizant abilities, he would have run and he would have beat Trump. Why should Kamala separate herself from his ideas. I thought his were good

Winning Elections is rather boring. It takes a special formula for success and you either can follow it and win or try to set new ground and lose. So far....Harris has not followed the formula. Trump has had 12 years of a head start on her and a successful campaign against a Clinton.

He only had success with Clinton because a few week's before the election, those 30,000 emails were brought out. She was leading all polls, she won the popular vote and only lost the electoral vote by 77,000. As such, Trump did not have a successful campaign against Clinton. He was LUCKY that email problem came out a few weeks before the election. That was what won him the election........nothing else.

She's had a severely short campaign with no successful primary. All her past problems have not been dealt with.

True, it is a negative.

Trump is not invulnerable or even that great at debate. But he is still much more experienced and savvy than she is at the moment regardless of histories.

Trump is only successful in conning people and as such, only successful in conning his cult members. He is not good in getting the undecided to come over. Biden won the undecided by a big margin and those were only leaving Biden because of his cognizant problems and not because Trump was winning them over.

 

[JohnDB]

No one's morality can be lower than Trump's but what morality are you criticizing in Kamala? To my knowledge, she has been a highly moral person. What do you know that I do not know

This is a problem that happens often. You have been caught up in an echo chamber and information bubble. It's not your fault but one from Google, YouTube, Facebook and other information sources. You are being shown what those platforms deem you want to hear instead of opposing viewpoints that are genuine instead of straw dogs easily knocked down. But Tlsi started in on Harris during the Democratic primary....she had crates of ammunition if she needed it. Her tenure as DA and before are FULL of "questionable" decisions. Death row prisoners not getting released when new evidence exonerated them, high convictions and sentences for Marijuana possession when she was smoking it herself. A lot of morality problems like that.

If Biden was not losing his cognizant abilities, he would have run and he would have beat Trump. Why should Kamala separate herself from his ideas. I thought his were good

Well, his ideas were not resonating well enough to get him a second term in office. His poll numbers and direction polls were low. If Harris expects to win she has to create at a minimum an illusion that she is going to be different and especially better.

He only had success with Clinton because a few week's before the election, those 30,000 emails were brought out. She was leading all polls, she won the popular vote and only lost the electoral vote by 77,000. As such, Trump did not have a successful campaign against Clinton. He was LUCKY that email problem came out a few weeks before the election. That was what won him the election........nothing else

October surprises are S.O.P. for presidential elections. There's likely one coming for both Trump AND Harris both. It's dirty pool but that politics. How juicy it is remains to be seen. The juiciest one not already addressed is the killer of the campaign. George W had his DUI come out against Al Gore....but since he addressed it earlier it was a nothing burger. AL had campaign finance issues come out in October. Dukakis had his tank driving come out that devastated his platform.

Trump is only successful in conning people and as such, only successful in conning his cult members. He is not good in getting the undecided to come over. Biden won the undecided by a big margin and those were only leaving Biden because of his cognizant problems and not because Trump was winning them over

This is debatable....at best. Forensic evidence that is available has shown a LOT of cheating with the mail in ballots. Georgia would ussue an apology to Trump if it didn't mean someone would go to jail over it. Pennsylvania had huge volumes of cheating. When 2x times the number of mail ballots issued are returned and counted....that's a problem. I really would not rely upon the cheating this election. The "cheat" margin has been included in the polling by using the results from the last election in the polls. And with the increased scrutiny already starting....I don't think it's going to work out this time like last time.

Joe's poll numbers dropped drastically after his first week in office. That whole "let's go brandon" campaign didn't help either. High disapproval numbers are still plaguing his presidency...and he is not even running anymore.
Which is why an illusion needs to be generated if she expects success.

 

[Luckyone]

This is a problem that happens often. You have been caught up in an echo chamber and information bubble. It's not your fault but one from Google, YouTube, Facebook and other information sources. You are being shown what those platforms deem you want to hear instead of opposing viewpoints that are genuine instead of straw dogs easily knocked down. But Tlsi started in on Harris during the Democratic primary....she had crates of ammunition if she needed it. Her tenure as DA and before are FULL of "questionable" decisions. Death row prisoners not getting released when new evidence exonerated them, high convictions and sentences for Marijuana possession when she was smoking it herself. A lot of morality problems like that.

You have no idea what I do and how I obtain my information. I will tell you that what you stated is but a FEW of the places I get my information.

Well, his ideas were not resonating well enough to get him a second term in office. His poll numbers and direction polls were low. If Harris expects to win she has to create at a minimum an illusion that she is going to be different and especially better.

He is a con artist. He will always use ideas that his people will buy. He is just so incompetent that he cannot get them done.

October surprises are S.O.P. for presidential elections. There's likely one coming for both Trump AND Harris both. It's dirty pool but that politics. How juicy it is remains to be seen. The juiciest one not already addressed is the killer of the campaign. George W had his DUI come out against Al Gore....but since he addressed it earlier it was a nothing burger. AL had campaign finance issues come out in October. Dukakis had his tank driving come out that devastated his platform.

Unfortunately for Trump, he is his own worst enemy

This is debatable....at best. Forensic evidence that is available has shown a LOT of cheating with the mail in ballots. Georgia would ussue an apology to Trump if it didn't mean someone would go to jail over it. Pennsylvania had huge volumes of cheating. When 2x times the number of mail ballots issued are returned and counted....that's a problem. I really would not rely upon the cheating this election. The "cheat" margin has been included in the polling by using the results from the last election in the polls. And with the increased scrutiny already starting....I don't think it's going to work out this time like last time.

There has always been cheating throughout history. Nonetheless, no more or less than ever before.

Joe's poll numbers dropped drastically after his first week in office. That whole "let's go brandon" campaign didn't help either. High disapproval numbers are still plaguing his presidency...and he is not even running anymore.
Which is why an illusion needs to be generated if she expects success.

Still he did more good than bad.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Mr. Trump, let me begin by stating a few FACTS about you.

In 2016, you made the following 2 statements:

1) "I alone can fix it"
2) "I will hire only the best people for the job"

And yet, 1) you made 104 campaign promises and you were only able to fulfill 24 of them, in spite of the fact that for the first two years of your presidency, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate. As such, your statement about "I alone can fix it" has proven to be untrue.

and 2) you had the biggest turnover in the history of U.S. presidents, with 85% of the people you picked either getting fired or leaving you. Firing them, meant they did not turn out to be the best and them leaving meaning those "best people" did not think you were doing a good job or not following your oath of office to defend the laws and the Constitution of the United States. This means that your statement about hiring the best was also untrue and the fact so many left you, means that your statement about "I alone can fix it" was also false.

In 2020, you made the accusation that the election was stolen and even though this contention was taken to court on over 60 occasions, it was never proven that any election fraud occurred. Your own Attorney General (Barr) said it wasn't true and even the Supreme Court refused to even look at the accusation saying "there are insufficient facts to have us even consider it". In spite of all that, you stimulated and supported a protest at the Capitol that turned into a potential insurrection. You even asked VP Pence to do something illegal of not confirming the election results. He refused and you said "I made a mistake in choosing Pence to be my VP", in addition you publicly defended those rioters that wanted to "hang Pence".

It has been proven that you did not handle the Covid pandemic well. You delayed the response to it and defunded the entities that handle pandemics and took their power away from them. It has been shown that your handling of the pandemic caused the unnecessary deaths of over 200,000 Americans.

All of the above, show you to be incompetent to be president again.

The above is what I think that Harris should start the debate tonight. All of the above are facts. No accusations or insults, just facts.

/——/ Commie Harris would need a teleprompter to say all that, and do so without cackling.
Besides Mumbles Biden is advising her.

 

[JohnDB]

You have no idea what I do and how I obtain my information. I will tell you that what you stated is but a FEW of the places I get my information.


He is a con artist. He will always use ideas that his people will buy. He is just so incompetent that he cannot get them done.


Unfortunately for Trump, he is his own worst enemy


There has always been cheating throughout history. Nonetheless, no more or less than ever before.


Still he did more good than bad.

Just as an FYI....
I don't know which candidate is going to be good for America in the long run. Biden did some good things....fixed some long standing issues. (Despite the press)

The cheating the last time was all one direction in majority. That's the problem. Usually it's not relevant. But this time it was sufficient for Democrats to change the outcome. But yes, there were some Republican cheats too....just not as prolific as Democrats last time. 2x the returned ballots but Trump narrowly won? Meaning phoney Republican ballots too. Just not as much as Democrats had.

Election counts are not to prove to the winner they won....
But verified proof to the loser that they lost. And with the cheating that didn't happen. Nobody believed Joe won which has plagued his entire presidency.

 

[Luckyone]

Just as an FYI....
I don't know which candidate is going to be good for America in the long run. Biden did some good things....fixed some long standing issues. (Despite the press)

The cheating the last time was all one direction in majority. That's the problem. Usually it's not relevant. But this time it was sufficient for Democrats to change the outcome. But yes, there were some Republican cheats too....just not as prolific as Democrats last time. 2x the returned ballots but Trump narrowly won? Meaning phoney Republican ballots too. Just not as much as Democrats had.

Election counts are not to prove to the winner they won....
But verified proof to the loser that they lost. And with the cheating that didn't happen. Nobody believed Joe won which has plagued his entire presidency.

Let me give you some information about me so you know who you are talking to.

I was a Republican for 35 years. I lost my parents when I was 18 and I had to make it on my own as I had no other family near by or that even knew me. I did it on my own. I built my life by myself (no one helped me). As such, I was a believer in the Republican platform.

Having said that, I became a stock analyst at 32 years old and was trained by the best two companies in the industry (Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache) and that made me an evaluator of information (given tat was my job). I was successful. I started a subscription service in 2007, writing a weekly newsletter on the Stock indexes, Gold, Oil, gas and metals, giving recommendations on what to buy, where to buy it and where to get out (when right or when wrong). I have been very successful in trading for myself and I still have 5 subscribers that started with me in 2007 and since my service is not free, evidently I have been doing well for them (been right more than wrong) as they are still with me.

I listen to Bloomberg TV 12 hours a day and read all possible news, articles, data, statistics, and facts (It is what makes me know what is going on).

I have a 136 IQ (or at least I had it the last time it was taken). As such, I am no dummy, no believer in what anyone else says and an evaluator of information on my own

 

[Frankenstein]

If you are supporting Trump, YOU are uninformed.

MArxist!

 

[Luckyone]

MArxist!

Is that all you know how to do? attack others in a misinformed way because they prove you wrong?