If RBG is gone, how about a deal: Merrick Garland for the wall and immigration reform?

[Pilot1]

Was RBG at the SOTU last night? They certainly avoided any of the several cameras showing her. If she was there she ust have been at deaths door.

They tried to fool people by wheeling in Norman Bates's Mom and propping her up in a chair. It worked.

 

[rightwinger]

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Garland was rejected before he was even selected

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Yup, Borking finally caught up to the Dems.

Even Republicans voted against him

He was that bad

We used to have a time where people on both parties crossed the aisle. Today, the progressive socialists are near lockstep in their agendas with the non progressive socialists crossing the aisle. And damn near all of the have an R next to their name.

Republicans poisoned the well with the Garland nonsense

They can expect no cooperation until it is rectified

Was RBG at the SOTU last night? They certainly avoided any of the several cameras showing her. If she was there she ust have been at deaths door.

She was home recuperating

Where was Clarence Thomas

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Garland wasn't the first nominee to get no hearing, to get no vote. He won't be the last.

First in a hundred years

But you are correct. He won’t be the last
Republicans have created a new norm for filling court vacancies
Vacancies will now remain unfilled until a President of your party takes office

Republicans have created a new norm for filling court vacancies

Yup, Borking finally caught up to the Dems.

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Garland was rejected before he was even selected

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Yup, Borking finally caught up to the Dems.

Even Republicans voted against him

He was that bad

Just the twats.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Republicans have created a new norm for filling court vacancies

Yup, Borking finally caught up to the Dems.

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Garland was rejected before he was even selected

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Yup, Borking finally caught up to the Dems.

Even Republicans voted against him

He was that bad

We used to have a time where people on both parties crossed the aisle. Today, the progressive socialists are near lockstep in their agendas with the non progressive socialists crossing the aisle. And damn near all of the have an R next to their name.

Republicans poisoned the well with the Garland nonsense

They can expect no cooperation until it is rectified

They'll rectify it after Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor and replaced by Trump nominees.

 

[boedicca]

Bork had a Senate hearing and a vote by all Senators
He was rejected as unsuitable

Yup, Borking finally caught up to the Dems.

Even Republicans voted against him

He was that bad

We used to have a time where people on both parties crossed the aisle. Today, the progressive socialists are near lockstep in their agendas with the non progressive socialists crossing the aisle. And damn near all of the have an R next to their name.

Republicans poisoned the well with the Garland nonsense

They can expect no cooperation until it is rectified

Was RBG at the SOTU last night? They certainly avoided any of the several cameras showing her. If she was there she ust have been at deaths door.

She was home recuperating

Where was Clarence Thomas

Thomas has skipped the SOTU for years.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Republicans have made it clear. President cant pick a justice so close to election. Non starter.

 

[candycorn]

You can’t Trust Trump to follow through with anything. If I’m offered that deal by the White House, I laugh them out of the room.

Yeah.. it’s not trump that can’t be trusted in a deal

You’re correct for once.

 

[Moonglow]

How about if you republican goons stop trying to abort RBG from the living.??

Is she living?

Can't you get your all seeing god to prognosticate her date of death?

 

[martybegan]

A sudden death at the end of the term when your party doesn't control the Senate is the new "precedent"

Expansion of that would be on the party that expands it.

A Supreme Court seat was left vacant for over a year

Setting a new precedent that an opposition party Senate is under no obligation to fill a seat

When a judge dies in an election year when the Senate is controlled by the other party.

If Dems want to extend on that, then it's on them to do so.

All bets are off
There is no longer an urgency to fill an empty seat

If it can sit empty for a year....it can sit for two years or three years

The Garland rule

No, again, the Republicans own this only in an election year when the opposite party is in charge. If it gets extended its on dems.

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

 

[martybegan]

Bork got taken in by a hatchet job, something progressives are known for, and something partisan twat-waddles like you applaud.

Bork was held accountable for his own record. Even Republicans voted against him.

Poor choice by Reagan

Bork as attacked and slandered by Teddy derp Kennedy, and the Dems piled on because of worry over Roe.

It's always about dead fetuses with democrats.

Bork was held accountable for his record
Garland never had a chance to defend his position

Bork was Character Assassinated.

It was his character

It was Dems slavish devotion to Roe, and it has created the current situation for every new SC appointment.

 

[rightwinger]

Even Republicans voted against him

He was that bad

We used to have a time where people on both parties crossed the aisle. Today, the progressive socialists are near lockstep in their agendas with the non progressive socialists crossing the aisle. And damn near all of the have an R next to their name.

Republicans poisoned the well with the Garland nonsense

They can expect no cooperation until it is rectified

Was RBG at the SOTU last night? They certainly avoided any of the several cameras showing her. If she was there she ust have been at deaths door.

She was home recuperating

Where was Clarence Thomas

Thomas has skipped the SOTU for years.

Past his bedtime?

 

[rightwinger]

A Supreme Court seat was left vacant for over a year

Setting a new precedent that an opposition party Senate is under no obligation to fill a seat

When a judge dies in an election year when the Senate is controlled by the other party.

If Dems want to extend on that, then it's on them to do so.

All bets are off
There is no longer an urgency to fill an empty seat

If it can sit empty for a year....it can sit for two years or three years

The Garland rule

No, again, the Republicans own this only in an election year when the opposite party is in charge. If it gets extended its on dems.

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

 

[martybegan]

When a judge dies in an election year when the Senate is controlled by the other party.

If Dems want to extend on that, then it's on them to do so.

All bets are off
There is no longer an urgency to fill an empty seat

If it can sit empty for a year....it can sit for two years or three years

The Garland rule

No, again, the Republicans own this only in an election year when the opposite party is in charge. If it gets extended its on dems.

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

 

[rightwinger]

All bets are off
There is no longer an urgency to fill an empty seat

If it can sit empty for a year....it can sit for two years or three years

The Garland rule

No, again, the Republicans own this only in an election year when the opposite party is in charge. If it gets extended its on dems.

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

It takes three months or less to fill a vacancy. Republicans waited a year to fill the seat

Under the Garland Rule, a seat can now be left vacant until the party holding the Senate feels like filling it

 

[martybegan]

No, again, the Republicans own this only in an election year when the opposite party is in charge. If it gets extended its on dems.

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

It takes three months or less to fill a vacancy. Republicans waited a year to fill the seat

Under the Garland Rule, a seat can now be left vacant until the party holding the Senate feels like filling it

Nope. It's amazing the games Dems play to try to make themselves look like political purists, when they play the same games their opposition does.

Try owning it, you mealy-mouthed cuck.

 

[rightwinger]

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

It takes three months or less to fill a vacancy. Republicans waited a year to fill the seat

Under the Garland Rule, a seat can now be left vacant until the party holding the Senate feels like filling it

Nope. It's amazing the games Dems play to try to make themselves look like political purists, when they play the same games their opposition does.

Try owning it, you mealy-mouthed cuck.

Show where Dems have refused to allow a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy

This is a new low for a partisan power grab

It sets a precedent Republicans will have to deal with

 

[martybegan]

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

It takes three months or less to fill a vacancy. Republicans waited a year to fill the seat

Under the Garland Rule, a seat can now be left vacant until the party holding the Senate feels like filling it

Nope. It's amazing the games Dems play to try to make themselves look like political purists, when they play the same games their opposition does.

Try owning it, you mealy-mouthed cuck.

Show where Dems have refused to allow a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy

This is a new low for a partisan power grab

It sets a precedent Republicans will have to deal with

Bork.

 

[boedicca]

We used to have a time where people on both parties crossed the aisle. Today, the progressive socialists are near lockstep in their agendas with the non progressive socialists crossing the aisle. And damn near all of the have an R next to their name.

Republicans poisoned the well with the Garland nonsense

They can expect no cooperation until it is rectified

Was RBG at the SOTU last night? They certainly avoided any of the several cameras showing her. If she was there she ust have been at deaths door.

She was home recuperating

Where was Clarence Thomas

Thomas has skipped the SOTU for years.

Past his bedtime?

Could you possibly be more banal? Thomas went on record years ago that he found the SOTU to be too partisan-political, so he opted out.

 

[22lcidw]

No, again, the Republicans own this only in an election year when the opposite party is in charge. If it gets extended its on dems.

Sorry Republicans

Nobody put you on a clock and you don’t get to set rules for when Dems are calling the shots

Garland rule is you don’t have to fill a seat for the opposition party

Nope. That would be a new "rule" for anything other than an election year vacancy due to a sudden death.

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

It takes three months or less to fill a vacancy. Republicans waited a year to fill the seat

Under the Garland Rule, a seat can now be left vacant until the party holding the Senate feels like filling it

Its not believing you anymore that you don't get. The Repubs keep playing by at least some rules while knowing that when the Progressive Socialists regain power they will change every rule to their advantage.

 

[rightwinger]

Sorry Republicans .......the “rule” was a sitting President gets to fill court vacancies

That rule no longer applies

Nice try, but extending out past an election year would be a new "rule"

It takes three months or less to fill a vacancy. Republicans waited a year to fill the seat

Under the Garland Rule, a seat can now be left vacant until the party holding the Senate feels like filling it

Nope. It's amazing the games Dems play to try to make themselves look like political purists, when they play the same games their opposition does.

Try owning it, you mealy-mouthed cuck.

Show where Dems have refused to allow a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy

This is a new low for a partisan power grab

It sets a precedent Republicans will have to deal with

Bork.

Bork was voted down by a wide margin. That is the way Senate confirmation is supposed to work

Garland was denied even before he was nominated