Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,773
- 55,412
- 3,600
He is not in office. Impeachment is to remove someone from office. Nothing could be plainer.If it was according to the Constitution Trump would still be in office."But for" causation is not enough to convict someone of breaking the law.If it weren’t for Trump, there would have been no riot. Everyone agrees.So, prove it.
Don't show me the heavily edited video the Democrats presented.
I want to see evidence that Trump made a statement that incited a riot.
Declaring the election was stolen is not proof Trump incited a riot.
Otherwise, we'd all be criminals.
Consider this:
I hail a taxi cab and it stops at the curb to pick me up.
I tell the driver where I want him to go and the driver pulls away from the curb and hits a pedestrian.
"But for" me hailing the cab and telling the driver where I want him to go, the pedestrian would not have been hit by the taxi.
Should the pedestrian be allowed to hold me legally liable for his injuries?
Funny. Impeachment is not a "criminal" process - it's a "political" process in accordance with the Constitution.
It's sadly funny just how dumb and uninformed you Trump NaziCons are. Everything that is taking place is 100% legal and in accordance with our Constitution, laws, and precedents.