HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
My bro and I just bought 70 acres up north michigan. I the thumb you can't shoot long range but where we bought we can. What long range deer gun should I buy? Cheap but big enough cal I can take down a deer. What's the smallest and go up. I'm going to be needing one because I hate it when I have my crossbow and a deer walks 80 feet from me.I'd want that rifle that shoots a long way and holds a lot of shells. Remington? How many rounds does your rifle hold? Wouldn't a 22 handgun be enough with the rifle and shotgun? I guess not if a bear wakes you up its not.You can only carry so much. Sorry. That's why one of my guns would be my little 22 daringer shoots 22s holds 5 and fits in the palm of my hand. I could take on 6 indians with just that gun. Provided they just had knives because if they had arrows they kill me because the guns no good at 10 paces. LolI went with a self defense handgun, a battle rifle that doubles as a hunting rifle, a shotgun that can defend or hunt, and a pair of .22s (revolver & 10/22). I think those will cover everything too.
I'm not sure I would be able to get rid of my Ruger No.1 in .270. That is my favorite and the prettiest rifle I have ever seen.
Let's cut it down to 3. Shotgun handgun and hunting rifle top 3. I like the Riflemans gun. So what would be the best handgun and why?
I am extremely fond of my M1911 .45 ACP. But if I could only have one handgun, it would be a single action .44 magnum. I could hunt small game with shotshells, big game with full bore .44 and use it defensively with .44 special (less recoil & quicker recovery time). Slow as hell to reload though.
Once you get out beyond 250 yards or so, the skill of the shooter starts to count as much as the rifle. Granted, some rifles won't be worth much at that range, but long range and high capacity may not be all you look at.
First of all, the true long range rifles tend to be heavy with long barrels. This makes them awkward for anything except long range shooting.
Second of all, the calibers are great for long range, but way over powered for anything close.
A .243 will do what you need but as WB said shot placement becomes more important. But with a little practice you can easily hit a tennis ball at a hundred yards.
Personally I would go with the .270 for that little extra knock down power and the recoil while somewhat harsh is totally manageable.
You wont be plinking with it,you'll sight it in and only shoot when you have a target so the recoil isnt that big a deal. And trust me,you wont even feel it when you have a deer in the scope,just be careful and dont dot your eye with the scope on recoil.