danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
those people may be better off on unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, so you can pay motivated labor fifteen dollars an hour, minimum.We have people in our company that won't produce very well no matter what my employer does. They just don't have the intelligence to perform good work. My employer could double their wage and they wouldn't produce anymore than they are today. Their work ethic is "I'm here to make a paycheck" not "I'm here to make the company profitable."or they quit in the middle of work and you lose time=money having to get someone else. Henry Ford understood the true nature of employment at will.the difference, my goode fascist, friend, is the difference between motivated and efficient labor, and unmotivated and inefficient labor.Do you really want anyone being able to waste your time=money, on a job they don't really want? The social costs alone are problematic.
I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't care if it's a job they really don't want, you have to support yourself and others in your family. I hate working. I wish I could quit today and stay on USMB all day long, but I have to work in order to keep a roof over my head.
There are only social costs when people don't support themselves and working people have to partially or fully support them.
Henry Ford understood the difference and counted on capital based morals to "win the day".
If you are underperforming on your job, you get fired and have to find a new one. That's how industry handles unmotivated and inefficient employees.