Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
The media is silent now, but under Bush the published the number of deaths daily.Your statementYeah, if the media really reported. They would let everyone know more soldiers have died under Obama's leadership.Yeah under Bush, but your a liberal your an idiot with a short memory. Remember the party the media threw when the count hit a thousand?When did you start caring about veterans? I seem to remember your kind counting their deaths daily, for political reasons.Scumbag Dr Ben Carson says 40 dead veterans a gift from God
Benny, Benny, Benny...
WTF are you even talking about.
"counting their deaths..."???
Shit, desperation makes people stupid.
Did you know there has been 43 US casualties this year? 5+ men a month dying and the press has said virtually nothing.
One of your more ridiculous quotes
We are talking about Afghanistan, making the statement perfectly true:
iCasualties Operation Enduring Freedom Afghanistan[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year US UK Other Total 2001 12 0 0 12 2002 49 3 18 70 2003 48 0 10 58 2004 52 1 7 60 2005 99 1 31 131 2006 98 39 54 191 2007 117 42 73 232 2008 155 51 89 295 = 604 2009 317 108 96 521 2010 499 103 109 711 2011 418 46 102 566 2012 310 44 48 402 2013 127 9 24 160 2014 43 6 11 60 = 1740 Total 2344 453 672 3469
They would let everyone know more soldiers have died under Obama's leadership.
Why are you deflecting so much on this thread?
First it was.....Well, Rice may have slugged a woman but Clinton got a blowjob
Then it was...Well....Rice may have slugged a woman but Obama had more soldiers killed in Afghanistan
No deflection you are taking the posts out of context. The context being that a lot of what Obama does and say has the MSM running cover which is displayed by the examples given.
And once again, Clinton did not get in trouble for his extramarital affair. Which by anyone's definition would be work place harassment but that went by the way side. Lying under oath, for any reason, should not go without punishment.