Internment of Japanese-Americans During World War II

Whatever you may say about the internment of Japanese-Americans, you cannot say that it had no legitimate national security function. We will never know what would have occurred, if the internment had not happened.

The only way that a valid, objective assessment could be made, is if there was an internment, and no internment, and then compare the two side by side – which, of course, is impossible. We will simply never know.

What we CAN assess, is that if we had never allowed Muslims to immigrate here, or come here on visas, we would not have had many terrorist attacks, which, in total, have killed thousands of our people.

We can also assess that a Muslim ban is not only legal, it is required by the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2, Part 1)
The fascist Democrats put American into concentration camps during WWII. That is clearly illegal. They also re-instituted slavery in the USA. Those are facts.

FDR was one of the most evil tyrants in world history.


lol.

Do you have a blog?
 
He enslaved Americans and used them as cannon fodder. He was an evil tyrant.

Okay- so FDR was an 'evil tyrant'- like Hitler- because FDR- like about a dozen American Presidents- used the draft to conscript Americans for the war- after the United States was attacked?

I guess we need more 'evil tyrants' like FDR then.
Actually he re-instituted slavery long before the Pearl Harbor attack.

He shouldn't have got the US into the war in the first place.
'long'? A year and a half in advance- which really wasn't even long enough considering the aggression of Japan and Germany.

Yeah FDR- forced Japan to attack the mean Americans- and forced Germany and Italy to declare war on us.
When nations are at war and you give arms to one side and put economic sanctions on the other, you have involved yourself in the fucking war, of course they will view your behavior as an act of war. That's just common sense. If the US would have stayed neutral we would have never been involved. But FDR was hell bent on war and the wholesale slaughter of Americans.

FDR was a war pig.


lol ranting lunatics expounding on American evil. Always hilarious. lol
Democrat evil, jackass.
 
Okay- so FDR was an 'evil tyrant'- like Hitler- because FDR- like about a dozen American Presidents- used the draft to conscript Americans for the war- after the United States was attacked?

I guess we need more 'evil tyrants' like FDR then.
Actually he re-instituted slavery long before the Pearl Harbor attack.

He shouldn't have got the US into the war in the first place.
'long'? A year and a half in advance- which really wasn't even long enough considering the aggression of Japan and Germany.

Yeah FDR- forced Japan to attack the mean Americans- and forced Germany and Italy to declare war on us.
When nations are at war and you give arms to one side and put economic sanctions on the other, you have involved yourself in the fucking war, of course they will view your behavior as an act of war. That's just common sense. If the US would have stayed neutral we would have never been involved. But FDR was hell bent on war and the wholesale slaughter of Americans.

FDR was a war pig.


lol ranting lunatics expounding on American evil. Always hilarious. lol
Democrat evil, jackass.

Stop reading Ann Coulter's ridiculous books, moron.
 
Whatever you may say about the internment of Japanese-Americans, you cannot say that it had no legitimate national security function. We will never know what would have occurred, if the internment had not happened.

The only way that a valid, objective assessment could be made, is if there was an internment, and no internment, and then compare the two side by side – which, of course, is impossible. We will simply never know.

What we CAN assess, is that if we had never allowed Muslims to immigrate here, or come here on visas, we would not have had many terrorist attacks, which, in total, have killed thousands of our people.

We can also assess that a Muslim ban is not only legal, it is required by the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2, Part 1)
The fascist Democrats put American into concentration camps during WWII. That is clearly illegal. They also re-instituted slavery in the USA. Those are facts.

FDR was one of the most evil tyrants in world history.


lol.

Do you have a blog?
Get a library card.
 
Actually he re-instituted slavery long before the Pearl Harbor attack.

He shouldn't have got the US into the war in the first place.
'long'? A year and a half in advance- which really wasn't even long enough considering the aggression of Japan and Germany.

Yeah FDR- forced Japan to attack the mean Americans- and forced Germany and Italy to declare war on us.
When nations are at war and you give arms to one side and put economic sanctions on the other, you have involved yourself in the fucking war, of course they will view your behavior as an act of war. That's just common sense. If the US would have stayed neutral we would have never been involved. But FDR was hell bent on war and the wholesale slaughter of Americans.

FDR was a war pig.


lol ranting lunatics expounding on American evil. Always hilarious. lol
Democrat evil, jackass.

Stop reading Ann Coulter's ridiculous books, moron.
Try reading some books, jackass. Start with American history.
 
Whatever you may say about the internment of Japanese-Americans, you cannot say that it had no legitimate national security function. We will never know what would have occurred, if the internment had not happened.

The only way that a valid, objective assessment could be made, is if there was an internment, and no internment, and then compare the two side by side – which, of course, is impossible. We will simply never know.

What we CAN assess, is that if we had never allowed Muslims to immigrate here, or come here on visas, we would not have had many terrorist attacks, which, in total, have killed thousands of our people.

We can also assess that a Muslim ban is not only legal, it is required by the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2, Part 1)
Whatever you may say about the internment of Japanese-Americans, you cannot say that it had no legitimate national security function. We will never know what would have occurred, if the internment had not happened.

The only way that a valid, objective assessment could be made, is if there was an internment, and no internment, and then compare the two side by side – which, of course, is impossible. We will simply never know.

What we CAN assess, is that if we had never allowed Muslims to immigrate here, or come here on visas, we would not have had many terrorist attacks, which, in total, have killed thousands of our people.

We can also assess that a Muslim ban is not only legal, it is required by the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2, Part 1)
When I was a kid I wondered why we didn't inter all Italians or all Germans during WWII either. Just Japs. It's all subjective. Why did a Muslim group kill more people on American soil than Japan and seemingly get away with it? Questions and even more questions.
 
Can't deny that.

Hey...FDR knew what he was doing

Before Japanese internment.....Pearl Fucking Harbor
After Japanese internment....No Japanese attacks
You know what I find amazing? How your ideology can switch, all because of a letter.

FDR was a freak'n military genius

He used interred Japanese as hostages

Hey Hirohito! Try that shit again and these Japs get it!
Notice how the Japanese didn't attack us again?

FDR was no military genius.

You can't argue with success

He turned the US from a third rate military power to the strongest military in history


More ignorance.
 
It worked

There was no Japanese terrorism
Can't deny that.

Hey...FDR knew what he was doing

Before Japanese internment.....Pearl Fucking Harbor
After Japanese internment....No Japanese attacks


Is that supposed to be a joke?

Nobody can question the effectiveness of internment in preventing future attacks
There were NONE after we locked up the Japanese
 
.... If those people weren't citizens, I wouldn't give a damn.


Then you are missing something very important.
do you ever say anything?

As a matter of fact, a big percentage of them, around 35%-40%, weren't American citizens, and weren't going to become citizens..
I knew a few of them weren't but I didn't know it was that much.

Didn't look it up lately, but it's near that percentage somewhere.
 
It worked

There was no Japanese terrorism
Can't deny that.

Hey...FDR knew what he was doing

Before Japanese internment.....Pearl Fucking Harbor
After Japanese internment....No Japanese attacks


Is that supposed to be a joke?

Nobody can question the effectiveness of internment in preventing future attacks
There were NONE after we locked up the Japanese







Lame joke no matter how many times you repeat it.
 
.... If those people weren't citizens, I wouldn't give a damn.


Then you are missing something very important.
do you ever say anything?

As a matter of fact, a big percentage of them, around 35%-40%, weren't American citizens, and weren't going to become citizens..




So that makes it ok to throw innocent people into concentration camps? Is that what you think America is about?
 
It worked

There was no Japanese terrorism
Can't deny that.

Hey...FDR knew what he was doing

Before Japanese internment.....Pearl Fucking Harbor
After Japanese internment....No Japanese attacks


Is that supposed to be a joke?

Nobody can question the effectiveness of internment in preventing future attacks
There were NONE after we locked up the Japanese







Lame joke no matter how many times you repeat it.

Now, if attacks continued after the Japanese were locked up, you could claim that internment did not stop the attacks

But since the attacks stopped AFTER we locked up the Japanese, you can't argue with success
 

Forum List

Back
Top