Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know what's absurd? Believing the supreme court doesn't have the power of judicial review
and as has been pointed out to you, when the opinion that a law is unconstitutional is rendered the law is not repealed. it is merely unenforceable.You know what's absurd? Believing the supreme court doesn't have the power of judicial review
You miss the point. Courts are free to give their opinion that a law is unconstitutional. But should that mean the law is repealed??? If so, then you're giving the judges legislative power.
it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.You know what's absurd? Believing the supreme court doesn't have the power of judicial review
You miss the point. Courts are free to give their opinion that a law is unconstitutional. But should that mean the law is repealed??? If so, then you're giving the judges legislative power.
it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
No...you don't know your U.S. government very well...To "repeal" a law is for the legislation to take it back...when the Court strikes down an unConstitutional law, it is "struck down", unenforcible.You know what's absurd? Believing the supreme court doesn't have the power of judicial review
You miss the point. Courts are free to give their opinion that a law is unconstitutional. But should that mean the law is repealed??? If so, then you're giving the judges legislative power.
And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Articles III and VI.And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Articles III and VI.And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
No...you don't know your U.S. government very well...To "repeal" a law is for the legislation to take it back...when the Court strikes down an unConstitutional law, it is "struck down", unenforcible.
It is a social Power not delegated by the People via our social Contract.And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Where is the wording because I think you are full of shit as normal .Articles III and VI.And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
So in other words I'm it isn't there and it is power stolen by tyranny and you support it because you are a idiotIt is a social Power not delegated by the People via our social Contract.And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Are you asserting that the Supreme Court does NOT have the power of Judicial Review?And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Actually it doesn't. That was a power taken by itself that allowed the Dred Scott decision. Something about you democrats wanting black people to be property. ...Are you asserting that the Supreme Court does NOT have the power of Judicial Review?And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
I agree to disagree that a supreme court is not a valid venue to discuss our supreme law of the land.Actually it doesn't. That was a power taken by itself that allowed the Dred Scott decision. Something about you democrats wanting black people to be property. ...Are you asserting that the Supreme Court does NOT have the power of Judicial Review?And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.it could be claimed that nullification of a law deemed not valid, is not the power of Repeal or Legislation.
HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Did we lose our first amendment where we are not allowed to discuss things openly?I agree to disagree that a supreme court is not a valid venue to discuss our supreme law of the land.Actually it doesn't. That was a power taken by itself that allowed the Dred Scott decision. Something about you democrats wanting black people to be property. ...Are you asserting that the Supreme Court does NOT have the power of Judicial Review?And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.HAHAHA. Is that the best you got? You claim nullifying a law is NOT repealing it??? uraloonybird
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
a court is a public venue and in the public domain; you cannot get more open than that since even the concept of perjury may apply.Did we lose our first amendment where we are not allowed to discuss things openly?I agree to disagree that a supreme court is not a valid venue to discuss our supreme law of the land.Actually it doesn't. That was a power taken by itself that allowed the Dred Scott decision. Something about you democrats wanting black people to be property. ...Are you asserting that the Supreme Court does NOT have the power of Judicial Review?And where is this power given to the court in the Constitution?Yes; un-Constitutional laws are null and void, from Inception.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Are you asserting that the Supreme Court does NOT have the power of Judicial Review?
a court is a public venue and in the public domain; you cannot get more open than that since even the concept of perjury may apply.
