Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's because that is not a rational basis since no one even bothers to ask if a couple can even have children? Marriage is not about children, and never has been. They are a common enough byproduct but that's all...The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Wrong. The rationale is in procreation, as natural and profound as eyesight.Denying a driver's license to a blind person is rationally based and pursues a proper legislative end – denying same-sex couples access to marriage law simply because they're gay is not rational, failing to pursue a proper legislative end.So how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
There's also no Constitutional right to drive, there is a Constitutional right to marry.
in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
They do just fine without marriage these days. I have no idea why gay marriage would affect that, and neither does anyone else. That dog won't hunt.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Very seriously and logically.So how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Because there is a very good reason for denying blind people a license to operate a motor vehicle. Because the states have standards that must be met for public safety. Surely you are not seriously asking this question.
They rationally assume they can or at least provide a natural facsimile of parents.That's because that is not a rational basis since no one even bothers to ask if a couple can even have children? Marriage is not about children, and never has been. They are a common enough byproduct but that's all...The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Wrong. The rationale is in procreation, as natural and profound as eyesight.Denying a driver's license to a blind person is rationally based and pursues a proper legislative end – denying same-sex couples access to marriage law simply because they're gay is not rational, failing to pursue a proper legislative end.So how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
There's also no Constitutional right to drive, there is a Constitutional right to marry.
No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
They rationally assume they can or at least provide a natural facsimile of parents.That's because that is not a rational basis since no one even bothers to ask if a couple can even have children? Marriage is not about children, and never has been. They are a common enough byproduct but that's all...The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Tell us, do unmarried fathers have the same rights as married fathers?No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Children lacking a parent are put at risk. Same thing. The point is that a natural limitation is legally acceptable in denying a drivers license the same can be applied for all licensing.Very seriously and logically.So how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Because there is a very good reason for denying blind people a license to operate a motor vehicle. Because the states have standards that must be met for public safety. Surely you are not seriously asking this question.
Then I explained it. It has to do with teh standards for public safety. Nothing comparable can be said for banning gay marriage.
No.Tell us, do unmarried fathers have the same rights as married fathers?No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?
Again, as already correctly noted, the ability to have children is not a prerequisite to marry, as infertile opposite-sex couples are allowed to marry.No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Pretty sure that even people with no junk, and no ability to speak, or even move their limbs, can still say "I do", since "I do and I promised to make babies soon" isn't actually part of the ceremony.Children lacking a parent are put at risk. Same thing. The point is that a natural limitation is legally acceptable in denying a drivers license the same can be applied for all licensing.Very seriously and logically.So how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Because there is a very good reason for denying blind people a license to operate a motor vehicle. Because the states have standards that must be met for public safety. Surely you are not seriously asking this question.
Then I explained it. It has to do with teh standards for public safety. Nothing comparable can be said for banning gay marriage.
Show us???No.Tell us, do unmarried fathers have the same rights as married fathers?No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossed
Children lacking a parent are put at risk. Same thing. The point is that a natural limitation is legally acceptable in denying a drivers license the same can be applied for all licensing.Very seriously and logically.So how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?The SCOTUS can not write law. But they CAN rule on the constitutionality of laws. And that is what they did. They ruled that the laws forbidding same sex marriage were unconstitutional. Without those laws, same sex marriage is legal.
Because there is a very good reason for denying blind people a license to operate a motor vehicle. Because the states have standards that must be met for public safety. Surely you are not seriously asking this question.
Then I explained it. It has to do with teh standards for public safety. Nothing comparable can be said for banning gay marriage.
Do drivers licences need to address blindness? No. Eyesight testing, yes. Blind are assumed to be unqualified. Problem with the anti-homo marriage crew is that they let the homofascists funnel the debate into religious realm.No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossedSo how do states get away with denying drivers licences to blind people?
First you have to show that a marriage licenses addresses procreation. That remains to be seen.
Married filing jointly and health coverage through a spouse's employer.Show us???No.Tell us, do unmarried fathers have the same rights as married fathers?No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.
Since their basic position was we hate faggots, the Bible says to, that wasn't a stretch...Do drivers licences need to address blindness? No. Eyesight testing, yes. Blind are assumed to be unqualified. Problem with the anti-homo marriage crew is that they let the homofascists funnel the debate into religious realm.No need to grant homos coercive licence since they can't procreate or provide a facsimile of natural parents.in your mind people are less able to procreate if gay marriages are recognized by the government?The rational basis (procreation) was obfuscated and otherwise not presented at all.They can present a rational basis for discrimination, and therefore get the courts to declare it legal. In this case no rational basis could be found, so the anti-gay marriage laws got tossed
First you have to show that a marriage licenses addresses procreation. That remains to be seen.
