Is another Civil War brewing?

[JakeStarkey]

007, the man behind the curtain, also believes the pres is kenyan muslim marxist homo socialist communist marxist who roots for the Minnesota Twin. What a humbug.

You represent thirteen other people. Maybe.

Put your comments in Conspiracy, because there is no Civil War brewing.

BLAH, BLAH.... BLAH, BLAH, BLAH.... BLAH...

... go pound your pud somewhere else, moron. Your sleasy, creepy shtick is old and nasty here.

According to the humbug of thirteen folks.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Bonzi, we had a "widening divide" from the forties through the sixties, and we survived it.

We now have the old overly white losers from that cultural war then making their last stand now.

Guess what? We will survive this as well, too.

 

[presonorek]

In the nuclear age the rules of the game have changed. There has never been a war between two countries that both have nuclear weapons. This doesn't mean that humankind has finally eliminated war. It just means that from now on our wars will all be civil wars because nukes don't play into the equation of civil war. Wars are started over lots of ideological components but war is always about a shortage of resources.

Food is still abundant. Chillax and put your storybook away. There is no civil war brewing in America as long as Wendy's has cheap hamburgers for sale.

 

[presonorek]

Bonzi, we had a "widening divide" from the forties through the sixties, and we survived it.

We now have the old overly white losers from that cultural war then making their last stand now.

Guess what? We will survive this as well, too.

I was saying that about race relations in another thread. When all of the racist die in about 10-30 years then we don't have to discuss race anymore.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

And yes, he was a fascist; an extreme right winger.

The term "National Socialism" arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of "socialism", as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism. [/quote]
There were 3 paths taken by the worlds people during WWII. There was conservatism -the capitalist way for life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Then there were 2 branches of "SOCIALISM". Far left socialism - Communism - everyone was treated equally, equally poor and equally miserable, except for the ruling class of liberal elites who thought they were better than everyone else. Far right socialism - Fascism - See definition.

You non intelligent lefties, wont LEARN what socialism really is, because then it would prove your whole life was nothing but a lie. Those who have been misguided by liberalism are victims of the left, those who arent misguided are EVIL, as they know who is behind them. Saul Alinsky s Rules for Radicals

Opening page - Dedication

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to
the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom —
Lucifer.”

There's literally nothing "politically right" about fascism. National socialism is socialism ... And in no way differs from any other aspect of socialism beyond the initiation of such... .

Think of national socialism as slow cook socialism... And international socialism as deep fried socialism.

Two flavors of the same shit.

It doesn't matter which one ya pick, because sooner or later, yea still gotta take a bite.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

In the nuclear age the rules of the game have changed. There has never been a war between two countries that both have nuclear weapons. This doesn't mean that humankind has finally eliminated war. It just means that from now on our wars will all be civil wars because nukes don't play into the equation of civil war. Wars are started over lots of ideological components but war is always about a shortage of resources.

Food is still abundant. Chillax and put your storybook away. There is no civil war brewing in America as long as Wendy's has cheap hamburgers for sale.

In case you've missed it... Wendy's is about to be forced to pay skill-less indigents $15/hr. You can't get out of a subway for under $10... For a roll a pinch of lettuce, two slices of tomato a slathering of mayo, a tiny bag of chips and a fountain soda.

And this before the 30 trillion economic debt cows come home.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I was saying that about race relations in another thread. When all of the racist die in about 10-30 years then we don't have to discuss race anymore.

ROFLMNAO

Children and Fools...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Reposted again because of Andaronjim and Keys' lies. Keys follows Andaronjim's nonsense.

andaronjim cannot define socialism, fascism, communism, or capitalism in traditional terms.

The fascists were far right wing, nationalist, racist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, and sexist ~ which define andaronjim and his buddies well.

As far as guns and Hitler, the DMN said it best: "They assert that the first thing Hitler did upon taking power as German chancellor in 1933 was to ban private gun ownership and to launch a nationwide arms-seizure effort. Then come the Hitler quotes, such as this one: “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.”

Hitler made that statement in 1942, not anytime even remotely close to his assumption of power. And he made the statement in reference to the people of countries he had conquered. I’m not defending Hitler, but the fact is, this is what conquerors do when they occupy a foreign land."

Hitler was alleged to have said it, supposedly heard by a person in a conversation. There is no corroboration.

Hitler would have been proud of Andaronjim. “The great mass of people… will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.”(Adolf Hitler)

 

[Skylar]

And yes, he was a fascist; an extreme right winger.

The term "National Socialism" arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of "socialism", as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism.

[/quote]

And here's your own source:

It rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed ideas of class equality and international solidarity, and sought to defend private property and businesses.

Socialism rejects marx, class equality and defends private property and business?

Really? I don't think socialism means what you think it means.

There were 3 paths taken by the worlds people during WWII. There was conservatism -the capitalist way for life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Then there were 2 branches of "SOCIALISM". Far left socialism - Communism - everyone was treated equally, equally poor and equally miserable, except for the ruling class of liberal elites who thought they were better than everyone else. Far right socialism - Fascism - See definition.

Who says that fascism is 'far right socialism'? You citing you.

There's literally nothing "politically right" about fascism.

Um, you just said that far right socialism was fascism. You're argument is a confused, self contradictory mess.

National socialism is socialism ... And in no way differs from any other aspect of socialism beyond the initiation of such... .

Save its rejection of marx, rejection of class equality, and its defense of private property and business. Per your own sources.

Remember, Keyes......you're clueless. It tends to hamper your arguments.

 

[S.J.]

andaronjim cannot define socialism, fascism, communism, or capitalism in traditional terms.

The fascists were far right wing, nationalist, racist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, and sexist ~ which define andaronjim and his buddies well.

As far as guns and Hitler, the DMN said it best: "They assert that the first thing Hitler did upon taking power as German chancellor in 1933 was to ban private gun ownership and to launch a nationwide arms-seizure effort. Then come the Hitler quotes, such as this one: “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.”

Hitler made that statement in 1942, not anytime even remotely close to his assumption of power. And he made the statement in reference to the people of countries he had conquered. I’m not defending Hitler, but the fact is, this is what conquerors do when they occupy a foreign land."

Hitler was alleged to have said it, supposedly heard by a person in a conversation. There is no corroboration.

Hitler would have been proud of Andaronjim. “The great mass of people… will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.”(Adolf Hitler)

If you weren't defending him you wouldn't have to qualify your statements with "I'm not defending Hitler, but...", especially when your entire post is defending him. How long have you been a Nazi?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I did not quality my statement regarding your hero, Hitler, S. J. Go back and read it again. I defend no one, merely outed you, your buddies, and your similarities to Hitler and his peeps.

The fact remains, without question, that you and your racialist buddies out there on the far right have much in common with the Nazis: far right wing, nationalist, racist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, and sexist.

 

[S.J.]

I did not quality my statement regarding your hero, Hitler, S. J. Go back and read it again. I defend no one, merely outed you, your buddies, and your similarities to Hitler and his peeps.

The fact remains, without question, that you and your racialist buddies out there on the far right have much in common with the Nazis: far right wing, nationalist, racist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, and sexist.

Your defense of Hitler is there for everyone to see. You even reposted it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I did not quality my statement regarding your hero, Hitler, S. J. Go back and read it again. I defend no one, merely outed you, your buddies, and your similarities to Hitler and his peeps.

The fact remains, without question, that you and your racialist buddies out there on the far right have much in common with the Nazis: far right wing, nationalist, racist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, and sexist.

Your defense of Hitler is there for everyone to see. You even reposted it.

Nah, t hat was your defense of him that I reposted.

Everybody go back and read his stuff.

Got you again.

 

[presonorek]

In case you've missed it... Wendy's is about to be forced to pay skill-less indigents $15/hr.

I didn't miss the looneys making unrealistic predictions. I did hear all of that stupid nonsense. I did however miss any bills that are currently in a congressional committee to raise the minimum wage to $15.

I am a realist. I don't respond to silly talk too much unless you make a really convincing argument.

 

[S.J.]

I did not quality my statement regarding your hero, Hitler, S. J. Go back and read it again. I defend no one, merely outed you, your buddies, and your similarities to Hitler and his peeps.

The fact remains, without question, that you and your racialist buddies out there on the far right have much in common with the Nazis: far right wing, nationalist, racist, totalitarian, anti-democratic, and sexist.

Your defense of Hitler is there for everyone to see. You even reposted it.

Nah, t hat was your defense of him that I reposted.

Everybody go back and read his stuff.

Got you again.

I guess that's your desperate attempt to save face after your defense of Adolf Hitler. Better try a different approach because you've been outed (by yourself).

 

[JakeStarkey]

S.J. writes "your desperate attempt to save face after your defense of Adolf Hitler" because I caught him defending Hitler. Anybody can go back and see S.J. in praise of his hero.

 

[presonorek]

I was saying that about race relations in another thread. When all of the racist die in about 10-30 years then we don't have to discuss race anymore.

ROFLMNAO

Children and Fools...

That is not a coherent thought structured in the form of a sentence. Your comment was worthless and only served the purpose of insulting me. You accomplished that but you really made no point and added nothing to the discussion. Congratulations! You are worthless.

If you have an education higher than third grade then tell us what you were trying to say. If you do not then continue making three word meaningless phrases that nobody understands. Only you know what your skills are. The rest of us can only guess what your capabilities are. We base those assumptions off of what you write.

 

[skookerasbil]

I was thrilled to see some pushback on the faggy flag burners in New York last weekend.................they scattered like cockroaches = ghey.

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/flag.jpg.html][/URL]

We'll be seeing more and more pushback in months to come. Typical white males are getting sick and tired of this PC crap.............most progressive jerkoffs on this board have no clue how pissed off southerners are. What you are going to see is people in the states saying FUCK YOU to laws that are in violation of the constitution. Already seeing it in New York for example where 96% of New York gun owners said fuck off when told they had to register their "assault" weapons or turn them in. Only goofball progressives think it is going to end up with state police going door to door to collect the weapons!!! LOL.....that was 3 years ago now. Connecticut.............same thing.

If people think that hordes of conservatives are just going to get on their hands and knees and take the pimpled cucumber up the butt via progressive trampling of the culture, well.............we'll see!!!. Only limpwristed progressives are stoopid enough to think that the history of the world doesn't matter and that somehow, conservatives in the United States are going to, very civil-like, just shit on American traditions!!!

 

[Unkotare]

Bonzi, we had a "widening divide" from the forties through the sixties, and we survived it.

We now have the old overly white losers from that cultural war then making their last stand now.

Guess what? We will survive this as well, too.

I was saying that about race relations in another thread. When all of the racist die in about 10-30 years then we don't have to discuss race anymore.

You can't be that dim-witted.

 

[presonorek]

Bonzi, we had a "widening divide" from the forties through the sixties, and we survived it.

We now have the old overly white losers from that cultural war then making their last stand now.

Guess what? We will survive this as well, too.

I was saying that about race relations in another thread. When all of the racist die in about 10-30 years then we don't have to discuss race anymore.

You can't be that dim-witted.

I frequently hear the phrase, "I'm not racist but". It's always somebody over the age of 60.

Most of the racist people in this country are over the age of 60. All of the black power, chip on your shoulder black people, whitey is holding me back nonsense is in response to white racist over the age of 60. Yes. Race relations are way better than they were in the 1950's.