It Begins: California Begins Indoctrinating Children Into The LGBT Lifestyle Against Parents Wishes

[Aba Incieni]

The majority of people are Democrats

The minority are gays.

And yet they are the stone around the whole party's collective neck. Deranged men in women's restrooms, election 2016. Ouch!

Obama's Biggest Loser next to Obamacare.

And the logical progression of dividing people along contrived lines. Black/white, gay/straight, men/women...pretend men/pretend women.

 

[Silhouette]

Have you read this yet, Sil?

Surviving Gay…Barely

It's pretty depressing but informative.

Thanks. I got about midway through it. But the gist is that the "gay" guy wasn't born that way; he became gay from mental origins to satisfy an emptiness from not fitting in as a twiggy boy in school.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

If I lived in California (of course I never would) I’d scream bloody murder. On the other hand, I would send my kids to school, and make sure to discuss what they heard. I do support California’s right to do this, and would vehemently object to any federal government intervention either pro or con. Let the people deal with it as they see fit.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Private school time

Interesting point. Giving your response, one could argue this law effects the poor more than the wealthy. How will that sit with the left in California?

 

[RealDave]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

You're still pissed that they don't teach the KKK principles.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Gays are so stupid...in their extreme attention-whoring narcissism they don't realize that they're simply generating resentment against themselves by beating the subject to death 24/7. They would be a lot more accepted if that wasn't the one and only thing their one-track minds are about. But then again, if gay idiots had a brain in their head they wouldn't stupidly support a gay slaughterhouse like Islam and they wouldn't have such a giant rate of one of the world's most easily preventable diseases. It never occurred to their pea brains to settle down with one HIV-negative boyfriend.

Gays' attitudes are so vomitous, their physical fucking is the LEAST offensive thing about them.

I agree with your sentiment, however I will point out that it is a vocal minority of the gay community who are so overt. Most would just like to live their life in peace.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

`
`
There is a choice. Don't send your kids to public school. All mine are/have been enrolled in private schools.

So the poor are discriminated against? That’s liberalism in all its Glory.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

You're still pissed that they don't teach the KKK principles.

Democrats lost even more ground with that one.

 

[Silhouette]

`
`
There is a choice. Don't send your kids to public school. All mine are/have been enrolled in private schools.

So the poor are discriminated against? That’s liberalism in all its Glory.

If you accept the church of LGBT as a giant attempt at legalized pedophilia, as I do, you'll understand that pedophiles like to zero in on kids from lower income or more likely broken home. Naturally these would be the types who attend public schools. Pedophiles select these types of children to "groom" (expose to beforehand) the idea that sex with them is OK, precisely because adults in that child's life will be statistically less inclined/able/likely, or too overworked or overstressed to maintain a supreme protective vigilance over the child.

It all seems to fit so coincidentally and perfectly into the plan. Get 'em young and teach up to accept deviant sex acts. After all, there is nothing static about an LGBT person. Their identity is 100% derived from the deviant sex behaviors they do. So, even mentioning them, let alone what they do, or them in the world "as normal" is inappropriate sexualized content exposed to children in school

 

[rightwinger]

If there is an actual gay person in history that accomplished something great (and I don't mean rumors about the person possibly being a gay person, but an ACTUAL gay person who admitted to such), then I wouldn't have a problem with them teaching us about that person. HOWEVER, when we talk about historical figures, we don't refer to them as heterosexual or homosexual because THAT is not the goddamn point!

It is a relevant point when you try to show that gays are not outcasts in our society and that they do contribute....helps erase the hate

Minority rule is never a good path. Ask Zimbabwe, Rwanda, and South Africa.

Republicans rule this country from a minority

. You've been watching to much of a specific MSM for whom has pumped up the idea that the conservatives are in the minority. Try changing the channel sometimes.

Trump received fewer votes than his opponent
In the House of Representatives, Republican members have received fewer total votes than Democrats, in the Senate, Democratic states have more population than Republican states

Republicans rule from a minority. They do not have the peoples support

 

[rightwinger]

Stop the Presses

Children are going to be told their are gay people and families out there and that it is not the end of the world

Parents outraged that their teachings of hate are being contradicted

. Children are going to be TOLD that there is something wrong with them by who "The School" ???

They need a public school to tell them that there is something wrong with them because they didn't know it until they went to the public school ??

So the parents nurture their children's biological male and female make up when raising them, but next it is then interpreted by school officials that the parents were teaching hate to their kids upon their arrival at public school, so the school has to then fix that ??

So if a parent teaches their child not to smoke cigarettes just because someone else does or that they don't have to be a goth person just because someone else is, and that they don't have to be a hippie just because someone else is or that they don't have to be a nerd/brainiac just because someone else is or they don't have to be a political figure just because someone else is, then the parents have done wrong by the child according to a public school board, official or officials ??

Uh freedom of choice should be allowed to flourish on any campus as long as one isn't committing a crime or abusing others. The school should only regulate and/or enforce laws against bullying or criminal activity found in students actions outside the classroom or inside a classroom on campus.

Inside the classroom the government should only be allowed to teach the children the skills needed to land a job in the workforce. Anything outside of such basic skill training should be considered electives in which a student of age is allowed to freely choose an elective, and not be forced to attend if doesn't want to. Anyone under the age of 18 should not be allowed to choose an elective without written parental consent.

Shouldn't sex Ed be an elective that has to come with parental consent ?? Shouldn't the parents be allowed to review the material and teaching/teacher credentials before consenting to their teenage children to be allowed to take the class ?

The schools are not teaching children to be gay
They are letting children know that there are some people in the country who are gay, that some marriages have partners of the same sex, that kids can be gay and that it is alright
They are teaching not to harass or bully someone who is homosexual

Parents are outraged because the hatred of gays they are teaching in the home are being contradicted

 

[Aba Incieni]

If there is an actual gay person in history that accomplished something great (and I don't mean rumors about the person possibly being a gay person, but an ACTUAL gay person who admitted to such), then I wouldn't have a problem with them teaching us about that person. HOWEVER, when we talk about historical figures, we don't refer to them as heterosexual or homosexual because THAT is not the goddamn point!

It is a relevant point when you try to show that gays are not outcasts in our society and that they do contribute....helps erase the hate

Minority rule is never a good path. Ask Zimbabwe, Rwanda, and South Africa.

Republicans rule this country from a minority

. You've been watching to much of a specific MSM for whom has pumped up the idea that the conservatives are in the minority. Try changing the channel sometimes.

Trump received fewer votes than his opponent
In the House of Representatives, Republican members have received fewer total votes than Democrats, in the Senate, Democratic states have more population than Republican states

Republicans rule from a minority. They do not have the peoples support

Only if Democrats are all gay. Which is a definite possibility.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Religious fanatics believe the following.

Killing is wrong only if it's a fetus.
Stealing is wrong only if it transfers money to a lower economic class of people.
Sanctuary cites are wrong because immigration scares me.
Two homosexual parents can't raise child.
Honoring parents is required because of its implied control, being inspired by them is another matter.
Somehow racism is a religious value.
Class warfare is good.
Personal responsibility is good as long as I can discriminate

Is that what you complain about?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Parents outraged that their teachings of hate are being contradicted

Only to corrupt, morally-depraved left wing-wing filth does basic morality and decency constitute “hate”. It is what happens when you choose to keep the company of sick sexual perverts, and allow your own mind and your own soul to be poisoned by their corrupting influence.

And now, that's what you want to be done to children, in public schools.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Have you read this yet, Sil?

Surviving Gay…Barely

It's pretty depressing but informative.

Thanks. I got about midway through it. But the gist is that the "gay" guy wasn't born that way; he became gay from mental origins to satisfy an emptiness from not fitting in as a twiggy boy in school.

It's hard to read, the author is very....verbose.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What's funny is you want to indoctrinate children in a god that has killed tens of millions of people in genocides, promotes slavery and has held back science for thousands of years.

What's worse? I'd say the christian god is.

Except that is prohibited in public schools.

Try again

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It is a relevant point when you try to show that gays are not outcasts in our society and that they do contribute....helps erase the hate

When you have to make up bogus claims that certain historical figures were sick sexual perverts, when there is no solid evidence to support such claims, in order to try to teach that sick sexual perverts contribute to society, then the point is rather defeated, isn't it?

 

[Silhouette]

What's funny is you want to indoctrinate children in a god that has killed tens of millions of people in genocides, promotes slavery and has held back science for thousands of years.

What's worse? I'd say the christian god is.

Except that is prohibited in public schools.

Try again

If teaching religion is banned in public schools, why is teaching the LGBT sexualized religion not only legal but mandated in some states? I think we really need to decide on a legal basis of LGBT is inborn or behavioral. Because if it's behavioral, it's a religion or cult of sorts. And as such cannot be taught in school at all.

It is PIVOTAL to recognize LGBT as behaviors. Because as behaviors it is a religion, not a static class like race or gender or country of origin.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What's funny is you want to indoctrinate children in a god that has killed tens of millions of people in genocides, promotes slavery and has held back science for thousands of years.

What's worse? I'd say the christian god is.

Except that is prohibited in public schools.

Try again

If teaching religion is banned in public schools, why is teaching the LGBT sexualized religion not only legal but mandated in some states? I think we really need to decide on a legal basis of LGBT is inborn or behavioral. Because if it's behavioral, it's a religion or cult of sorts. And as such cannot be taught in school at all.

It is PIVOTAL to recognize LGBT as behaviors. Because as behaviors it is a religion, not a static class like race or gender or country of origin.

It's all part of trying to "normalize" something that is abnormal, goes against nature and promote the agenda.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Yes it worked with contradicting parental teachings on negros too

All those years of teaching your children who to hate being contradicted by the schools

Right. Because being a negro is exactly equivalent to being a degenerate, immoral sexual pervert.

That's not the least bit racist, is it?