Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd think that fascist lackey like you would want everyone to forget climategate, given how it proved beyond any shadow of a doubt what unrepenentant liars all deniers are.Here’s why one can’t discuss subjects with this asswipe, he ignores facts like climategate
Your arguments are silly and meaningless. I’ll post it once again and you’ll pigeon crap on the board, knock over all the pieces and declare victoryAnd by countless times, you mean "not even once".
If you're not lying, I'm sure you can link to one of those times. Please do so.
<crickets>
Remember Frank, your lies make the baby Jesus cry. You'll also burn in Hell for them, unless you repent. And that means actual contrition, actually apologizing for your lies.
You mean for the first time.Your arguments are silly and meaningless. I’ll post it once again
Exactly.
And everyone who said otherwise is lying. It's that simple.
It's a trick of the trade.
Oh wait. Are you claiming that anyone using a trick of the trade is engaging in immoral behavior? Yes or no, please. You seem to be using an equivocation fallacy to imply immorality, which is dishonesty on your part.
Now, the the trick was to add instrumental temperature series to the end of the tree ring reconstruction prior to smoothing.
Outright liars will claim the trick was to "hide the decline". They'll even used faked quotes to back up their lie. I hope you don't stoop to that level.
This can only mean that the internal combustion engine is 500,000 years old!Ah .. so the scientific evidence is wrong ... all a great big conspiracy ... here's the ice core data ... see how wrong you are, 15ºC swings during human existence ... fucking stupid ... just keep sucking tit little boy ...
The Arctic is warming far faster than predicted.
Because they cover different time frames.What reason would they have to do that?
Obviously not, since they cover different time frames.Didn't both sets of data agree?
Who predicted?The Arctic is warming far faster than predicted
Because they cover different time frames.
Obviously not, since they cover different time frames.
No, but the proportionality between ring thickness and temperature changed over the last couple of centuries.Why weren't both sets available? Did trees stop producing rings?
Are you relying on oxygen isotope data from ice cores? Your dismissing the oxygen isotope curve in the other thread rings disingenuous. Or is it this one where you are being disingenuous.
You’re boring me.You mean for the first time.
Given how badly you suck at lying, you really should do less of it.
No, but the proportionality between ring thickness and temperature changed over the last couple of centuries.
CO2 measurements don't convert into temperatures. Want to try again?These are direct CO2 measures ... trapped in the ice ... it's only a half million years here, your other chart was 100 million years ...
Don't be a titty like mamooth ...
The cornerstone of the success achieved by ice core scientists reconstructing climate change over many thousands of years is the ability to measure past changes in both atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and temperature. The measurement of the gas composition is direct: trapped in deep ice cores are tiny bubbles of ancient air, which we can extract and analyze using mass spectrometers. Temperature, in contrast, is not measured directly, but is instead inferred from the isotopic composition of the water molecules released by melting the ice cores.
How are past temperatures determined from an ice core?
www.scientificamerican.com
What data do you think they hid?Instead of just showing the data, they used a trick.......to hide data.
The data set Mann refused to show in court!What data do you think they hid?
What data do you think they hid?
The change in proportionality between ring thickness and temperature was well known within dendrochronology for years before that stupid email. So, where and when do you believe their proxy failed because the time period where Mike's Nature trick was applied is well covered by instrument data.The failure of their old proxy.
The dumber deniers are pretending they've given the original Ottmar Edenhofer quote. The smarter ones won't touch the topic, because they know Frank is lying.You’re boring me.
The same old One Note Samba.
When I post it, if I post it, you’ll just run away or embarrass yourself.
www.nzz.ch
