Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,182
- 1,590
- Thread starter
- #181
And ‘most’ are being fed inaccurate data in order to push the agenda.Most feel the current data suggests draconian measures. It is many people from many countries have decided this. There is no sure thing. But the potential take away if the draconian measures are not taken the result of the disease will be worse on the economy and everyone's lives if not checked.You’re throwing the baby out with the bath water. You suggest not presuming upon less risk but you’re willing to hurt people economically through overreaction without first accurately determining the risk. Why not let the world operate as usual and then when/if the data suggests draconian measures, implement them then?Yes but they are statistically relevant. Factoring in the known potential deviation the analysis is significant enough to tell us the actions are necessary.They will be refining the analytics on this forever. And assume it the contagious rates and the mortality rate are much lower, great. Possibly we have overreacted but assume they are higher. I feel current recommendations are prudent. They are comparing the early data from this virus with the data they had on existing viruses at the same time in the life cycle. That helps them make predictions with having less data than they like.Which is what I've been saying all along........................And that 1% is very close to the South Korea Rate of 0.7%.............And they have done more data than the others there.................More tests ............So better Statistics...........Yet that rate is 480% lower than the WHO RATE................Which is double the Rate your site posted...........which is different from the CDC...........Yes, the data is changing as more data becomes available. But factoring in a range for mortality rate, a range for how contagious, plus you cannot change that 100% of the population is susceptible, you have a problem thaat warrants actions being taken.
I predict the mortality rate will go lower, possibly closer to 1%. There are many people who have had the virus and recovered who do not show up in the calculations.
The Rates are all over the place...........THAT HAS BEEN AND IS MY POINT...They aren't Statistically accurate.
I think we agree on more than we disagree,
The biggest concern is for those third world countries who cannot take these actions. What will happen there. Ultimately that may tell us if we have over reacted or not.
Agenda of what, exactly?
I can assure you, the communists in China could not give less of a shit what democrats think.