It's time to start thinking about resistance.

[Faun]

Even if the Dems don't take the White House, there are local battles to fight.

If it's Hillary or Sanders, only we can stop the destruction and loss of basic rights.

It's time to organize, to unite, to resist. If there are enough of us, they cannot throw us all in jail.

A little revolution now and then is a good thing.

So how do we start?

This country is fucked, we are all living on borrowed time. Capitalize on what you can...
Lol

That's what happens with liberal policy. It destroys everything in its path. Just ask Detroit. Filed bankruptcy after decades of Dumbocrat mayors and Dumbocrat controlled city councils. Liberal policy creates more destitution, more poverty, and more misery.

As compared to the entire state of Mississippi?

 

[P@triot]

You were saying???

Poll: 20% of Dems would defect for Trump

Poll: Nearly 20 Percent of Democrats Would Vote for Trump Over Hillary

Trump Could Win It All

About one in five Democrats would vote for TRUMP, poll finds

You might want to look at some real numbers for Trumps favorable/unfavorable ratings.

Political Figures: S-W


View attachment 71631

Wait....wait....wait....I provide 4 different links to major news outlets, you respond with "look at some REAL number" and then post a link to....to.....to....Quinnipiac University?!?! Is that even a real university?!?! Holy shit....

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed". Now you're suddenly going with a new narrative of "well yeah....it does....but hey it's only one poll and one poll doesn't mean anything".

Why doesn't it mean anything? Simply because you don't agree with it? Simply because everyone on the left is freaking out over the thought of the country not being run by an unhinged radical marxist/socialist? I mean Trump is pretty damn liberal. If you guys are this terrified of a liberal, what does it say about how radicalized you have become?

 

[Faun]

You might want to look at some real numbers for Trumps favorable/unfavorable ratings.

Political Figures: S-W


View attachment 71631

Wait....wait....wait....I provide 4 different links to major news outlets, you respond with "look at some REAL number" and then post a link to....to.....to....Quinnipiac University?!?! Is that even a real university?!?! Holy shit....

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed".

Your derangement worsens. No one here denied the poll's existence.

 

[HappyJoy]

You might want to look at some real numbers for Trumps favorable/unfavorable ratings.

Political Figures: S-W


View attachment 71631

Wait....wait....wait....I provide 4 different links to major news outlets, you respond with "look at some REAL number" and then post a link to....to.....to....Quinnipiac University?!?! Is that even a real university?!?! Holy shit....

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed". Now you're suddenly going with a new narrative of "well yeah....it does....but hey it's only one poll and one poll doesn't mean anything".

Why doesn't it mean anything? Simply because you don't agree with it? Simply because everyone on the left is freaking out over the thought of the country not being run by an unhinged radical marxist/socialist? I mean Trump is pretty damn liberal. If you guys are this terrified of a liberal, what does it say about how radicalized you have become?

Why doesn't one poll from over 2 months ago that doesn't align with any other available data mean anything? Why are you cherry picking yesterday's news? That is the question.

 

[HappyJoy]

Wait....wait....wait....I provide 4 different links to major news outlets, you respond with "look at some REAL number" and then post a link to....to.....to....Quinnipiac University?!?! Is that even a real university?!?! Holy shit....

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed".

Your derangement worsens. No one here denied the poll's existence.

Just the make believe liberal voices in his head that he likes to argue with. I mean, something has to be in there, right?

 

[P@triot]

Wait....wait....wait....I provide 4 different links to major news outlets, you respond with "look at some REAL number" and then post a link to....to.....to....Quinnipiac University?!?! Is that even a real university?!?! Holy shit....

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed". Now you're suddenly going with a new narrative of "well yeah....it does....but hey it's only one poll and one poll doesn't mean anything".

Why doesn't it mean anything? Simply because you don't agree with it? Simply because everyone on the left is freaking out over the thought of the country not being run by an unhinged radical marxist/socialist? I mean Trump is pretty damn liberal. If you guys are this terrified of a liberal, what does it say about how radicalized you have become?

Why doesn't one poll from over 2 months ago that doesn't align with any other available data mean anything? Why are you cherry picking yesterday's news? That is the question.

I'm not "cherry picking" anything. I provided exponentially more reliable data than your liberal cohort with her "Quinnipiac University" poll. And "yesterday" is still very relevant. It's not from decades ago. It's not from years ago. It was the past couple of months. Still very real and relevant. Sorry if Trump scares the hell out of you (frankly, he scares the hell out of me) but denying reality doesn't make it any less real.

 

[HappyJoy]

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed". Now you're suddenly going with a new narrative of "well yeah....it does....but hey it's only one poll and one poll doesn't mean anything".

Why doesn't it mean anything? Simply because you don't agree with it? Simply because everyone on the left is freaking out over the thought of the country not being run by an unhinged radical marxist/socialist? I mean Trump is pretty damn liberal. If you guys are this terrified of a liberal, what does it say about how radicalized you have become?

Why doesn't one poll from over 2 months ago that doesn't align with any other available data mean anything? Why are you cherry picking yesterday's news? That is the question.

I'm not "cherry picking" anything. I provided exponentially more reliable data than your liberal cohort with her "Quinnipiac University" poll. And "yesterday" is still very relevant. It's not from decades ago. It's not from years ago. It was the past couple of months. Still very real and relevant. Sorry if Trump scares the hell out of you (frankly, he scares the hell out of me) but denying reality doesn't make it any less real.

Clinton vs. Trump 7 polls since Mid March average out to a 9.9% lead for Clinton.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

Same polling companies with Sandrs vs. Trump - Sanders up over 16%.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Sanders

That is way more information than the cherry picked single outdated poll your sources all seem to point to. Mine are more numerous and current, you have nothing, boy.

There is no current data that shows Trump is electable.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Even if the Dems don't take the White House, there are local battles to fight.

If it's Hillary or Sanders, only we can stop the destruction and loss of basic rights.

It's time to organize, to unite, to resist. If there are enough of us, they cannot throw us all in jail.

A little revolution now and then is a good thing.

So how do we start?

By not announcing that you're starting a revolution.

 

[Faun]

Do you have anything in the past 2 months?

So let me get this straight - 20% of Democrats said they would cross over to vote for Trump just 8 weeks ago but now they've suddenly changed their mind....why? Because the truth makes you uncomfortable? It doesn't make it any less true. And nobody is changing their vote from a mere two months ago. It's not like the poll was from two decades ago.

By the way....do you have anything that is not from Quinnipiac University?!?

A single poll said that and a single poll doesn't mean squat.

Well that's interesting - your liberal cohorts (completely unaware of what is going on in current news and apparently too lazy to even Google it) claim that "no such poll existed". Now you're suddenly going with a new narrative of "well yeah....it does....but hey it's only one poll and one poll doesn't mean anything".

Why doesn't it mean anything? Simply because you don't agree with it? Simply because everyone on the left is freaking out over the thought of the country not being run by an unhinged radical marxist/socialist? I mean Trump is pretty damn liberal. If you guys are this terrified of a liberal, what does it say about how radicalized you have become?

Why doesn't one poll from over 2 months ago that doesn't align with any other available data mean anything? Why are you cherry picking yesterday's news? That is the question.

I'm not "cherry picking" anything. I provided exponentially more reliable data than your liberal cohort with her "Quinnipiac University" poll. And "yesterday" is still very relevant. It's not from decades ago. It's not from years ago. It was the past couple of months. Still very real and relevant. Sorry if Trump scares the hell out of you (frankly, he scares the hell out of me) but denying reality doesn't make it any less real.

Aww, poor, rightard. You have nothing else, do ya?

 

[Synthaholic]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

 

[P@triot]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

 

[Synthaholic]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

 

[Contumacious]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

 

[P@triot]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Man...so angry. Proving once again the age old adage:

"If you want to anger a conservative, lie to them. If you want to anger a liberal, tell them the truth".

Nancy Pelosi's husband became a "very wealthy businessman" because she used her power in Congress to filter contracts to him. And yes, that is well documented (don't be afraid to question your leaders and do a little research on them). By the way - why aren't they giving all of that money away to the less fortunate? To the hungry? The homeless? The uninsured? I thought you wing nuts loved those people?!? Not the wealthy who hoard their money for themselves?

As far as ideal? No - honestly that is not "ideal" at all. Ideal would be that Obama and his cronies would actually respect the U.S. Constitution they took an oath to uphold and defend. After that, the next ideal situation would be to have a Supreme Court filled with true justices (such as Antonin Scalia) instead of political activists (such as Sonja Sotomayor, Elaina Kagen, and Ruth Ginsburg) who would recognize that Obamacare is 100% unconstitutional as the federal government has 18 enumerated powers and health care is not one of them. Furthermore, the federal government has not authority to insist that the American people purchase a good or service. These are simply indisputable facts.

So yes - I greatly respect and admire the Tea Party for their tireless effort to restore Constitutional government. And it doesn't "cost" anything for them to vote. They are paid to vote on legislation. I would rather see them attempting to repeal something to restore legal government than to add something illegal (like your side of the aisle has been doing for the past 100 years).

 

[Skylar]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

So far its withstood any constitutional challenge. And clearly 'by any means necessary' doesn't include any violent action. As you'd have to put down the beer and pizza rolls long enough to wage it. And we both know that's not going to happen.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

So far its withstood any constitutional challenge.

Not exactly. It was ruled a tax in opposition to the administration's wishes. With sufficient votes it can be easily repealed.

 

[Skylar]

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

So far its withstood any constitutional challenge.

Not exactly. It was ruled a tax in opposition to the administration's wishes. With sufficient votes it can be easily repealed.

With sufficient votes ANY legislation can be repealed. So you've described all laws, everywhere.

As for the constitutionality, the courts used a dfferent rationale than Obama argued.....but they found the law thoroughly constitutional.

 

[Contumacious]

Well duh....they aren't done cleaning it up yet.

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

So far its withstood any constitutional challenge. And clearly 'by any means necessary' doesn't include any violent action. As you'd have to put down the beer and pizza rolls long enough to wage it. And we both know that's not going to happen.

WE THE PEOPLE are the guardians of the Constitution (1787).

May I remind you that individuals are nominated to the SCOTUS who are socialists, fascists, government supremacists so WE THE PEOPLE are denied judicial review by an Article III Court.


Secondly , because of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL seventeenth Amendment the Senate is now another House of Representatives.


.

 

[Skylar]

And this will be your response when Louis Gommert is running for his 10th term, too.

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

So far its withstood any constitutional challenge. And clearly 'by any means necessary' doesn't include any violent action. As you'd have to put down the beer and pizza rolls long enough to wage it. And we both know that's not going to happen.

WE THE PEOPLE are the guardians of the Constitution (1787).

You're not 'The People', Cont.

May I remind you that individuals are nominated to the SCOTUS who are socialists, fascists, government supremacists so WE THE PEOPLE are denied judicial review by an Article III Court.

Like the constitution says that direct taxes are only legal in emergencies?

May I remind you that we can actually read the constitution. And no one's eligibility to be a Supreme Court justice is predicated on whatever labels you apply to them.

As you're nobody.

Secondly , because of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL seventeenth Amendment the Senate is now another House of Representatives.

How is a constitutional amendment unconstitutional? May I remind you that a constitutional amendment IS the constitution.

You....you don't actually know what the fuck you're talking about, do you?

 

[Contumacious]

To be honest - I highly doubt they will have it cleaned up by his 10th term. But if they do, my response will be dependent upon his performance.

If he has $10 million in his bank account and is violating the U.S. Constitution daily - just like Nancy Pelosi - I will consider him a typical dirt-bag politician who should not have become a career politician. If, however, he is a man of modest means who is upholding the U.S. Constitution as his oath requires him to, I will respect and praise him.

What do you think of a "performance" that wastes taxpayer money to the tune of over $60 million to repeal Obamacare over 50 times, knowing that Obama will never sign it?

Is that the Tea Party ideal? The ones who constantly bitch about the government spending money? They're frauds from a fraudulent, Astroturfed "movement".

Nancy Pelosi's husband is a very wealthy businessman - I though you wingnuts loved those people? If you have any evidence that she has stolen taxpayer money, put up or shut the fuck up.

Obama Hellcare must be abolished by any means necessary.

It is a socialist unconstitutional scam

.

So far its withstood any constitutional challenge. And clearly 'by any means necessary' doesn't include any violent action. As you'd have to put down the beer and pizza rolls long enough to wage it. And we both know that's not going to happen.

WE THE PEOPLE are the guardians of the Constitution (1787).

You're not 'The People', Cont.

May I remind you that individuals are nominated to the SCOTUS who are socialists, fascists, government supremacists so WE THE PEOPLE are denied judicial review by an Article III Court.

Like the constitution says that direct taxes are only legal in emergencies?

May I remind you that we can actually read the constitution. And no one's eligibility to be a Supreme Court justice is predicated on whatever labels you apply to them.

As you're nobody.

Secondly , because of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL seventeenth Amendment the Senate is now another House of Representatives.

How is a constitutional amendment unconstitutional? May I remind you that a constitutional amendment IS the constitution.

You....you don't actually know what the fuck you're talking about, do you?

I understand than in Orwellian terms ONLY socialists, fascists and state supremacists are "the people", that is typical of all tyrannies. The dissenters have no rights the tyrannical majority has to recognize.