It's True... I was embarrassed by much of what Trump said..

Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

NPV.jpg

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
Still doesn't mean shit. I don't want five states dictating the national agenda, got it yet, dummy?
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
Still doesn't mean shit. I don't want five states dictating the national agenda, got it yet, dummy?

I don't give a flying squirrel's asshole fuck what you "want", Jimbob. I'm pointing out that IT FUCKING EXISTS.
Now go ye forth and learn how to read.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
Still doesn't mean shit. I don't want five states dictating the national agenda, got it yet, dummy?

I don't give a flying squirrel's asshole fuck what you "want", Jimbob. I'm pointing out that IT FUCKING EXISTS.
Now go ye forth and learn how to read.
I know what Liberals want. They want permanent one party control over the entire fucking country!
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
Still doesn't mean shit. I don't want five states dictating the national agenda, got it yet, dummy?

I don't give a flying squirrel's asshole fuck what you "want", Jimbob. I'm pointing out that IT FUCKING EXISTS.
Now go ye forth and learn how to read.
I know what Liberals want. They want permanent one party control over the entire fucking country!

Ah the Rhetorical Fascisti are here to tell us what we think. Be still my fart.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:

That link is a map of electoral votes and whether they went Democrat or Republican. You're really not making a case. At least try to show one where they pretend that the votes for electors in the various states equal a popular vote. In any case, last I heard, The Cook Political Report does not run elections in the United States.

Theres no such thing as a popular vote for President of the United States. There's not even a thing that is "a" popular vote when you add the states. It doesn't exist. You're making it up.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
Still doesn't mean shit. I don't want five states dictating the national agenda, got it yet, dummy?

I don't give a flying squirrel's asshole fuck what you "want", Jimbob. I'm pointing out that IT FUCKING EXISTS.
Now go ye forth and learn how to read.

Doesn't exist. Show me a law or in the Constitution that creates a popular vote for president. Show me which federal agency runs a national, popular vote, election. Show me how and where those ballots are prepared and who distributes them, resceives them back, and counts them?

There's only a fake-news press pretending, wishing, there were such a thing.
 
Biden/Obama/etc said much more idiotic crap:
..there's NO problem of white supremacy

you don't believe any of that, so w/e. not worth responding to you on it.
here you go:
And here you go. Nobody showed up or cared about Trump lmao.

3108.jpg
that's why he WON the election--because no one cared!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH--you fked up there!!!!!--unwittingly
lost the popular vote. in other words, none of the people cared. just the electoral college

You know, I hate this. Trump did note LOSE the popular vote, this country does NOT HAVE a popular vote. Or more realistically, what this country has is 50 separate popular votes that are then tallied together to determine who becomes president. That's the way this process was intended to work and that's the way the process HAS always worked. That you disagree with that process is meaningless, as is everything else you've posted on this thread.

Balderdash. Of course there is a popular vote. It's counted right down to the single unit.

And by that measure Rump lost his two elections by a combined seventeen million. Which is to say, seventeen million (rounded off) voters, given the choice of Rump or somebody else, voted for somebody else.

INCLUDING, it should be noted, the 2016 votes of the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the "Terrible Three" of the perfect storm. Along with several others including Florida, AridZona and even frickin' UTAH.

There are records of these things.
There's no such thing as a popular vote for president. States vote for electors. Electors elect the president. In California, 5 million more voted for the Democrat electors than voted for the Republican electors. The DNC doesn't get to take those 5 million extra votes in California and add them to, for instance, Oklahoma or other states and change the electoral votes in those states. It just doesn't work that way. There literally is no such thing as a national popular vote for President and all the manipulations of state vote differences to come up with magic numbers to overturn the honest election results can change them.

There still IS a popular vote REGARDLESS what we do or don't do with it. IT EXISTS.

For that matter there's also a male vote, a female vote, a black vote, a white vote, a youth vote, an older vote, any way you want it sliced.

Does it determine who wins the Presidency? It does not. Does it tell us how many Americans voted for which candidate? It does.


That's ridiculous. There's no national vote. If there is, what national government organization counts it? Which organization collects the votes? Establishes voting districts and locations? Prints popular vote ballots. Don't be stupid.

UNREAL.

What the fuck is this then??

What the fuck is in this link??

:banghead:
Still doesn't mean shit. I don't want five states dictating the national agenda, got it yet, dummy?

I don't give a flying squirrel's asshole fuck what you "want", Jimbob. I'm pointing out that IT FUCKING EXISTS.
Now go ye forth and learn how to read.
I know what Liberals want. They want permanent one party control over the entire fucking country!

Ah the Rhetorical Fascisti are here to tell us what we think. Be still my fart.
Nope. Just the plain unvarnished truth. You want no competition to your sick diseased ideology, Communist.
 
Surely the Canadians are smart enough to build their own pipeline in their own country and build their own refineries for the sludge they want to pipe to Texass.
Gas at 2 dollars a gallon and less. Not moving up sharply. We will build eco green powerplants to throw your children into at some point. 5 dollars a gallon is coming.
It was .97 cents a gallon last April, what happened?
It was cheaper then now. You will not get away of being responsible of energy cost increases.
 
That was in the last 6 months alone. I could think of a lot more, like him saying his inaguration crowd was bigger than Obama's on his 1st day in office lmao.

EDIT: The lies started within 60 seconds of his inaguration. It was hilarious.


The lies started in the Obama years when he insisted Obama was from Kenya. Then he continued the lies in June 2015 when he came down that escalator in trump tower to announce he was running.
 
Doesn't exist. Show me a law or in the Constitution that creates a popular vote for president. Show me which federal agency runs a national, popular vote, election. Show me how and where those ballots are prepared and who distributes them, resceives them back, and counts them?

There's only a fake-news press pretending, wishing, there were such a thing.
Chill dude. Trump lost in 2020...it will be okay. Life will go on.
 
..nothing to be embarrassed about
No doubt. It's not supposed to be a popularity contest. Results are all that matter.
Every politician says stupid shit. Every politician makes promises they know they can't keep. Every politician lies or intentionally distorts the truth. Every politician has a ridiculous ego. Every. Politician acts like they are better than the people they were sent to represent.

But, you know....orange man bad.
 
..nothing to be embarrassed about
1) He told you to inject bleach into your body
2) He said that COVID would disappear like a miracle
3) He said that California forests, if you drop a cigarette the entire forest explodes in a fiery crash because they're so dry
4) He said that Governors have to be nice to him during COVID if they want him to help them
5) When asked about Russian bounties on killing US soldiers he did not respond or say anything.
6) When he lost the election, he said he won and that dead people rose from the grave and voted
7) He said he would have to be dragged out of the White House on January 20th

Just off the top of my head, in the last 6 months of time, there's a lot you have to be embarrassed about. Now, whether you have the human emotion of shame, I don't know.

But you have a lot to be embarrassed about
bro.
You and your disturbing avatar. He never said to inject bleach. He does speak with hyperbole frequently.
 
Doesn't exist. Show me a law or in the Constitution that creates a popular vote for president. Show me which federal agency runs a national, popular vote, election. Show me how and where those ballots are prepared and who distributes them, resceives them back, and counts them?

There's only a fake-news press pretending, wishing, there were such a thing.
Chill dude. Trump lost in 2020...it will be okay. Life will go on.
Yet you and your fellow leftists cannot stop talking about him? Are you sure he lost?
 
but what he accomplished and DID I really LIKED!
Attached are some statements and policies that Obama had that :
A) Trump 100% as I did disagreed with and
B) Trump did something about it!
Neither Trump nor millions like me could understand how an environmentally oriented person like Obama would allow 1 million barrel oil tankers to replace the safe 700 barrel per mile Keystone pipeline.
The Kinder Morgan project, named for the Houston pipeline firm that is pushing it, would send 34 tankers a month through international waters of Haro Strait and the Strait of Juan de Fuca Very sensitive waters, these . . . with millions of sockeye salmon bound for the Fraser River, an endangered Orca population surviving on endangered Chinook salmon, and major populations of nesting bald eagles.
Or why Obama would want 1,400 companies to go out of business laying off 450,000 employees and stop paying $100 billion a year in Fed/state/local and property taxes on empty office buildings. Obama preferred that!
Or Obama preferred higher gas prices, skyrocketing utilities and utility companies to go bankrupt.
Trump would never advocate any of the below. Nor would I or millions of Americans.
Sadly we have Biden who advocates these and MORE ways to destroy America.
Folks the facts are hard to argue with. Gas prices are up over 20% in America since Biden banned explorations on government land.
Utility prices are skyrocketing as more wind turbines will be winterized and the subsidies for them will increase.
OH and Obama's record of part-time employees will be resumed as more rigid Obamacare enforcement like this:
If you are a small business with 49 or less employees and you want to hire another full time employee, under Obamacare the employer must now spend a minimum of $14,000/month for healthcare plans for 50 or more employees.
The employer..."hmmm $14,000/month for one more employee? I'll just hire 2 part time employees"!
Watch and see this repeated..
Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract By Investing.com


View attachment 460017

I agree with your fundmental premise.

He'd be president if he was less of a jerk.

He got a lot of good things done.

But he opened himself up and his war with the press didn't help him any.

You'd think he'd know that you need allies in key places.
 

Forum List

Back
Top