J6 Committee now claiming they never had access to any security footage

[SassyIrishLass]

Yes the right wing media lies keep coming, and you keep repeating them without question.

Right wing loons making claims on Twitter is proof of nothing.

You thought Russian collusion and pee tapes were facts


Roflmao

 

[Auld Phart]

When you have footage from many hundreds of cameras, yes.

how many on the Committee?

How many staff?

 

[BlindBoo]

Yet staff never showed the exculpatory evidence to the J6 dog and pony Committee.

What exculpatory evidence?

 

[BackAgain]

It's one fck up another. Russian collision, pee tapes, etc.

Sadly about half the loons keep buying it

Almost half the population. But all of the loons.

 

[Billiejeens]

I thought all of this was Tucker cherry picking and corrupting the video? Why would J6 feel the need now to say they did not have access to the security footage?

Is it because they are fucked?

 

[Billiejeens]

how many on the Committee?

How many staff?

It didn't take Tucker long.

The hubris of these fucks that thought it would remain hidden...

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Democrats would not lie about something like that would they?........ . . would they?

 

[Marener]

how many on the Committee?

How many staff?

9 committee members. I have no idea how many staff but it was a lot. They interviewed over a thousand people and had over a million documents in addition to the footage, which was one small part of the overall investigation.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Back tracking, trying to save what little cred they have left

Exactly…. Because the smearing of Tucker only went so far yet questions remained.

 

[BlindBoo]

are you admitting they 'cherrypicked' the evidence?

Well you could say they ignored several years worth of footage to get a few hours worth of violent images of the crowd but also to capture the vitriolic and savage nature of those Berserkers involved.

 

[marvin martian]

With tens of thousands of hours of footage, the vast majority is always going to be neglected.

They stick to what was relevant.

And what was relevant? Not the footage showing cops opening doors for the protesters and leading them through the building?

 

[The Duke]

Sniff, Sniff....Do you smell that? That's the smell of damage control.

A weaksauce attempt at damage control.

 

[Marener]

And what was relevant? Not the footage showing cops opening doors for the protesters and leading them through the building?

Still have yet to see this mythical footage of cops opening doors to let protestors into the Capitol.

Not even Carlson showed that.

 

[Auld Phart]

Still have yet to see this mythical footage of cops opening doors to let protestors into the Capitol.

Not even Carlson showed that.

 

[BlindBoo]

Not the footage showing cops opening doors for the protesters

Post that footage.

 

[Auld Phart]

Post that footage.

just did,

took .6 seconds to Google it.

 

[marvin martian]

Post that footage.

See post #114.

 

[Billiejeens]

9 committee members. I have no idea how many staff but it was a lot. They interviewed over a thousand people and had over a million documents in addition to the footage, which was one small part of the overall investigation.

You are definitely committed

Or should be.

 

[Meister]

With tens of thousands of hours of footage, the vast majority is always going to be neglected.

They stick to what was relevant.

It's kinda weird that they just happen to have seen all the cherry picked, out of context
video, and not any that might have lent evidence to the contrary of them being guilty.

Common sense and you fools will never cross paths.

 

[Thinker101]

Still have yet to see this mythical footage of cops opening doors to let protestors into the Capitol.

Not even Carlson showed that.

Seems you've been watching way too much CNN and MSNBC.