Jeb Bush: Let's Focus On Helping Christian Syrian Refugees, Rather Than Muslims

[thereisnospoon]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Are you kidding? Or just conveniently deluding yourself?....
Question....If the US allows what are now potentially dangerous people, where is the "win" for us? Explain what purpose this serves

 

[bripat9643]

No. He thinks he can spin a few words around to make it sound better. but the answer is STILL NO. unless all you in favor will take them to your homes and PAY FOR THEM for the first two years TOO

Even then I would still say "no." The issue isn't who will pay for them. The issue is do we want to import potential terrorists, and also whether we want to import a bunch of uncivilized barbarians who's value system is inimical to ours.

 

[bripat9643]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Are you kidding? Or just conveniently deluding yourself?....
Question....If the US allows what are now potentially dangerous people, where is the "win" for us? Explain what purpose this serves

It makes liberals feel morally superior to those who disagree with them, and looking down their noses at other Americans is their favorite hobby.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Why are NaziCons so fearful of everything? They probably don't walk in sunlight for fear of seeing their shadow. It really is sadly funny how they want to spend nearly the entire U.S. budget on defense - while ignoring infrastructure and social issues.

Why do you want them here? What's in it for you?

America should do its part - especially after Bush fucked up the Middle East. Another reason is because it scares the shit out of NaziCon cowards. Face the fact that Bush has turned the whole world into one big clusterfuck.

You emotionally charged and uninformed vapid opinion is duly noted.
Tell ya what...You can have you precious refugees if you agree to welcome them into your neighborhood and allow some of them to live in your home...
Talk the talk.. Walk the walk.

 

[Correll]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Are you kidding? Or just conveniently deluding yourself?....
Question....If the US allows what are now potentially dangerous people, where is the "win" for us? Explain what purpose this serves

If you let in enough "potentially" dangerous people, you effectively guarantee that some dangerous people will get in.

The question we need to ask ourselves is, do we want more terrorism, anti semitic violence, misogyny and crime?

 

[007]

No. He thinks he can spin a few words around to make it sound better. but the answer is STILL NO. unless all you in favor will take them to your homes and PAY FOR THEM for the first two years TOO

Even then I would still say "no." The issue isn't who will pay for them. The issue is do we want to import potential terrorists, and also whether we want to import a bunch of uncivilized barbarians who's value system is inimical to ours.

Obama does, and so does half this board. Why? Hell I don't know. Near as I can figure, they all hate America and want us to suffer the next mass shooting like Paris.

 

[bripat9643]

We shouldn't take any at all, period.

Make some "safe space" for them there, in their own region.

We've never before used a religious litmus test for refugees. Fuck that.

We've never had millions of members of a bloodthirsty cult trying to immigrate here. These are people who have said they would like to impose Sharia on us all.

Fuck you.

 

[thereisnospoon]

We shouldn't take any at all, period.

Make some "safe space" for them there, in their own region.

My, what a compassionate heart you have.

The poster suggested a safe space for all. Given that no Christians have killed in the name of Isis, Bush suggested they would be more safe to let in so that we could mitigate the risk against the Sharia jihadists. How do you not find that compassionate?

I find it UNFAIR. I want my tax dollars to help all or none - regardess of religion!

Didn't you know that fire water and you red skins don't mix?

Didn't you know that racist personal attacks make you look stupid and immature?

Oh..So now YOU are offended?
Now I suppose you'll be demanding your own "safe space".....GLWT

 

[Coyote]

We shouldn't take any at all, period.

Make some "safe space" for them there, in their own region.

We've never before used a religious litmus test for refugees. Fuck that.

We've never had millions of members of a bloodthirsty cult trying to immigrate here. These are people who have said they would like to impose Sharia on us all.

Fuck you.

Really? Which Syrian refugees said that?

 

[bripat9643]

Why would Jeb think Syrian Arab Christians are more worthy than Syrian Arab Muslims - if they can pass a careful screening process? Our "Godless" secular Constitution is indifferent to both.

The FBI has already said it can't screen them. Even if it could, why would we allow people who oppose all are values to become citizens?

 

[bripat9643]

We shouldn't take any at all, period.

Make some "safe space" for them there, in their own region.

We've never before used a religious litmus test for refugees. Fuck that.

We've never had millions of members of a bloodthirsty cult trying to immigrate here. These are people who have said they would like to impose Sharia on us all.

Fuck you.

Really? Which Syrian refugees said that?

You actually believe that's a serious question?

 

[Coyote]

We shouldn't take any at all, period.

Make some "safe space" for them there, in their own region.

We've never before used a religious litmus test for refugees. Fuck that.

We've never had millions of members of a bloodthirsty cult trying to immigrate here. These are people who have said they would like to impose Sharia on us all.

Fuck you.

Really? Which Syrian refugees said that?

You actually believe that's a serious question?

Ah, you're just talking out your ass then.

 

[idb]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Are you kidding? Or just conveniently deluding yourself?....
Question....If the US allows what are now potentially dangerous people, where is the "win" for us? Explain what purpose this serves

How am I deluding myself by waiting for the true story?

Just as a thought experiment though...if ISIS didn't want other countries to accept refugees, planting a passport next to a dead terrorist would be a pretty good start.
Look at your reaction for example.

 

[bripat9643]

Why are NaziCons so fearful of everything? They probably don't walk in sunlight for fear of seeing their shadow. It really is sadly funny how they want to spend nearly the entire U.S. budget on defense - while ignoring infrastructure and social issues.

Why do you want them here? What's in it for you?

America should do its part - especially after Bush fucked up the Middle East. Another reason is because it scares the shit out of NaziCon cowards. Face the fact that Bush has turned the whole world into one big clusterfuck.

The Middle East has been fucked up for 1000 years. If Europe wants to destroy itself, that's its business, but there's no reason we should fallow it down the toilet bowl to cultural obvlivion

 

[Brain357]

Why would Jeb think Syrian Arab Christians are more worthy than Syrian Arab Muslims - if they can pass a careful screening process? Our "Godless" secular Constitution is indifferent to both.

The FBI has already said it can't screen them. Even if it could, why would we allow people who oppose all are values to become citizens?

Pretty sure we make our immigrant quota each year now just from Mexico. No need to bring in potentially dangerous ones.

 

[bripat9643]

We shouldn't take any at all, period.

Make some "safe space" for them there, in their own region.

We've never before used a religious litmus test for refugees. Fuck that.

We've never had millions of members of a bloodthirsty cult trying to immigrate here. These are people who have said they would like to impose Sharia on us all.

Fuck you.

Really? Which Syrian refugees said that?

You actually believe that's a serious question?

Ah, you're just talking out your ass then.

Apparently you do believe it's a serious question, and you weren't even worried about everyone laughing.

 

[007]

Why would Jeb think Syrian Arab Christians are more worthy than Syrian Arab Muslims - if they can pass a careful screening process? Our "Godless" secular Constitution is indifferent to both.

The FBI has already said it can't screen them. Even if it could, why would we allow people who oppose all are values to become citizens?

Pretty sure we make our immigrant quota each year now just from Mexico. No need to bring in potentially dangerous ones.

Tell that to the kenyan muslim in the white house...

Obama not 'reconsidering' plan to bring in Syrian refugees

... he's taking hating America to an all new level.

 

[bripat9643]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Yeah, because it could easily have been one of the patrons who bought tickets to see an American rock band who had the Syrian passport

 

[idb]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Yeah, because it could easily have been one of the patrons who bought tickets to see an American rock band who had the Syrian passport

Yep, or it could have been planted there, or it could have belonged to the terrorist...who knows at this point?

 

[007]

"Religion should have nothing to do with which refugees are accepted - so long as they go through a careful screening process."

Correct.

It's reprehensible to refuse asylum to some based solely on their religion.

Muslim refugees aren't responsible for the attacks in Paris.

Bush is indeed wrong on this, showing his cowardice and lack of sound reasoning skills – someone clearly not qualified to be president.

Paris terrorist held Syrian refugee passport, says Greek government official

That headline isn't correct.
The real story is that the passport of a Syrian refugee was found next to a dead terrorist.
It hasn't yet been confirmed that it belonged to one of the terrorists.

Yeah, because it could easily have been one of the patrons who bought tickets to see an American rock band who had the Syrian passport

Yep, or it could have been planted there, or it could have belonged to the terrorist...who knows at this point?

You'd make a real shitty cop. Your powers of deduction are beyond ignorant.