P@triot
Diamond Member
No "average" here either buttercup....Here we go with averages again, they are just for losers. What was Bush's final approval and what was Bush's?
Opinion | Bush’s ratings beat Obama’s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No "average" here either buttercup....Here we go with averages again, they are just for losers. What was Bush's final approval and what was Bush's?
9/11, San Bernadino and the gay club massacre were victories which could have been pre-empted by this victory.Jihadist groups on Sunday celebrated the Trump administration’s ban on travel from seven Muslim-majority countries, saying the new policy validates their claim that the United States is at war with Islam.
Comments posted to pro-Islamic State social media accounts predicted that Trump’s E.O. would persuade American Muslims to side with the extremists. One posting hailed the U.S. president as “the best caller to Islam,” while others predicted that Trump would soon launch a new war in the Middle East.
“[Islamic State leader Abu Bakr] al-Baghdadi has the right to come out and inform Trump that banning Muslims from entering America is a ‘blessed ban,’” said one posting to a pro-Islamic State channel on Telegram, a social-media platform. The writer compared the executive order to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, which Islamic militant leaders at the time hailed as a “blessed invasion” that ignited anti-Western fervor across the Islamic world.
Several postings suggested that Trump was fulfilling the predictions of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American born al-Qaeda leader and preacher who famously said that the “West would eventually turn against its Muslim citizens.”
Jihadist groups hail Trump’s travel ban as a victory
That's true! Obama was definitely a "loser" in the eyes of the American people. That's why the Dumbocrats lost nearly 1,000 seats during his reign of terror and why is average is so pitiful.Here we go with averages again, they are just for losers.
The fact is - if Obama was "popular" with the American people he would have a very high average. Not one of the lowest all time.
How desperate does one have to be to talk about "approval ratings" after one week in office?Now, of course, Obama is not that popular in Patsy's trailer park but luckily that trailer park is NOT America.
What - 2013 doesn't count in your mind?!?
The above eternal moron (Patsy) had to find a poll from back in 2013........(what an)
How can one not love nat4900 "logic". Barack Obama's official approval rating after 5 years (which means one full term in office) is "irrelevant" but President Trump's approval rating just 5 days on the job is so important, it requires multiple threads and a discussion ad nauseam.The above eternal moron (Patsy) had to find a poll from back in 2013.......
How desperate does one have to be to talk about "approval ratings" after one week in office?
He has accomplished more in six months than Obama did in 8 years. He's repaired relations around the world that Obama destroyed. He's restored U.S. sovereignty. He's created jobs that Obama sent overseas. He's approved affordable energy that will lower prices which Obama "necessarily caused" to skyrocket.Aren't you one of those brainwashed Trumpster who goes around spewing, ..."...Trump has done more in a week than most presidents have done in 6 months...."???How desperate does one have to be to talk about "approval ratings" after one week in office?
Live with the results......LOL
9/11, San Bernadino and the gay club massacre were victories which could have been pre-empted by this victory.
He did read them. Unfortunately, he was following a Dumbocrat president who did what Dumbocrat presidents always do - ignored national security and cut defense.9/11, San Bernadino and the gay club massacre were victories which could have been pre-empted by this victory.
Actually, 9-11 could have been prevented if the GWB entourage bothered to read their daily briefings...Of course, Trump is "too smart" to also read those........
(maybe his wife can read those briefings to him.)
He did read them. Unfortunately, he was following a Dumbocrat president who did what Dumbocrat presidents always do - ignored national security and cut defense.
Bill Clinton had 8 freaking years to take care of Al Qaeda and he completely ignored them. Sudan offered Bin Laden to Clinton. They had him. He told them "no". On top of that - he cut defense half a trillion dollars over his 8 years.He did read them. Unfortunately, he was following a Dumbocrat president who did what Dumbocrat presidents always do - ignored national security and cut defense.
Re-read what you wrote and you TOO would agree what a fucked lame retort that is....LOL
Bill Clinton had 8 freaking years to take care of Al Qaeda and he completely ignored them. Sudan offered Bin Laden to Clinton. They had him. He told them "no". On top of that - he cut defense half a trillion dollars over his 8 years.
And...even Bill Clinton himself admitted he could have killed Bin Laden and chose not to. Humiliated yet nat4900? You should be...
Bwahahahahaha!!! Oh man...you are more ignorant about U.S. history than any person I have ever encountered. Every post you make is humiliating for you.Bill Clinton back in early 1996 HAD NO BASIS to capture or kill OBL.....NO REASONS besides OBL badmouthing the US for having our soldiers in Saudi Arabia......
Yes folks....our little progressive high school friend here really is this ignorant of the topic at hand. But it doesn't stop this fragile little snowflake from popping off at the mouth anyway.Bill Clinton back in early 1996 HAD NO BASIS to capture or kill OBL.....NO REASONS besides OBL badmouthing the US for having our soldiers in Saudi Arabia......
Yes folks....our little progressive high school friend here really is this ignorant of the topic at hand. But it doesn't stop this fragile little snowflake from popping off at the mouth anyway.
Bwahahahahaha!!! The fragile little snowflake doubles-downNO BASIS to capture or kill OBL back in 1996.....NONE..........Yes folks....our little progressive high school friend here really is this ignorant of the topic at hand. But it doesn't stop this fragile little snowflake from popping off at the mouth anyway.
I just can't stop laughing at this....Bill Clinton back in early 1996 HAD NO BASIS to capture or kill OBL.....NO REASONS besides OBL badmouthing the US for having our soldiers in Saudi Arabia......