Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. I conceded nothing to your stupid ass.Sure ya did. You presented no proof to back your claim that Sussmann billed Hillary at the exact time he met with the FBI.
Nope. I conceded nothing to your stupid ass.
Your delusions are cute.
Grow a brain.
Unlike you, I have provided links to support my positionsLOL
Nothing you say can turn your bullshit into reality. You still have no proof to back your claim that Sussmann billed Hillary at the exact same time he met with the FBI. Your own links destroyed you. I just sat back and watched and laughed as you posted one link saying the defense countered that claim by pointing out Sussmann billed Perkins Coie, not Hillary; and then another link saying the billing wasn't clear.
https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/downloadSure ya did. You presented no proof to back your claim that Sussmann billed Hillary at the exact time he met with the FBI.
We don't want you to be the arbiter of guilt? No rational person would. The same goes for D.C juries.Yes, we know that's the country you authoritarian sheep want.
We aren't there yet, sorry.
WE know they are democrats. That's enough.You were already like that. You are of low ethical character.
That's why you so freely assume 8 jurors you never met are of as low ethical character as you are.
You are abnormal, and they are not bottom of the barrel ethically, like you. The vast majority of people aren't.
So you agree that lying to the FBI is a felony. Now explain why Sussmann shouldn't go to prison for the same crime.
You and your sleazy cohorts all hooted for Flynn to go to prison.
Who are you trying to fool?
That's right, you supported people going to prison for process crimes. No explain why Sussman's case is different.
You prog morons are unbelievable. When Republicans complain about an injustice being done to them, you shout and holler about how it's totally justified. Then when you one of your heroes is wriggling on the same hook, you call Republicans hypocrites for demanding the same treatment. You aren't even capable of understanding why you're the hypocrites, not Republicans. Demand equal treatment for both cases is not hypocritical. That's called justice, you fucking moron.
okay...who changed the definition of lie.
no. DC jury, clinton supporters on jury, obama appointed judge and the usual, lawlessness of DC in general. Put a damn fence around that God forsaken place and don't let them out.
No one cares about your mental malfunction, dumbass.If I were dragged into a jury to decide what the content of a conversation was... I'd be pretty pissed off.
No one cares about your mental malfunction, dumbass.
We’ll at least they got lunch moneyWell, no, but the mindset of the jury should bother you.
Durrrr-ham spent years building up this HUGE CONSPIRACY to try to frame Trump for Russian collusion, and all he came up with after it was all said and done was did Sussman claim he was acting on his own when he provided the FBI with information on something THEY WERE ALREADY INVESTIGATING.
These jurors looked at each other, and wondered why there was three weeks of their lives they weren't going to get back having to listen to this nonsense.
no, that isn't all he came up with, dumbass. He has a lot more targets in his sights.. Durham new he was going to lose the Sussmann case. He did it to get certain testimony on the record under oath. The malefactors won't be able to lie their way out of their crimes.Well, no, but the mindset of the jury should bother you.
Durrrr-ham spent years building up this HUGE CONSPIRACY to try to frame Trump for Russian collusion, and all he came up with after it was all said and done was did Sussman claim he was acting on his own when he provided the FBI with information on something THEY WERE ALREADY INVESTIGATING.
These jurors looked at each other, and wondered why there was three weeks of their lives they weren't going to get back having to listen to this nonsense.
no, that isn't all he came up with, dumbass. He has a lot more targets in his sights.. Durham new he was going to lose the Sussmann case. He did it to get certain testimony on the record under oath. The malefactors won't be able to lie their way out of their crimes.
If no one pays for what hilliary and Obama did to a candidate for presidency and THEN THE President of the US then this country is done. THe Rule of Law will be done. Now maybe the left would like that....but in the long run they will suffer as much as any of us.
Wow, you have a healthy fantasy life. If they can't get Sussman, they certainly aren't going to get anyone else.
The only reason why he brought charges against Sussmann was because the Statue of Limitations was about to run out.
The only other indictment he has is Igor Danchenko, who is charged with making false claims about his sources to the FBI. He didn't even work for Hillary directly.
joel said:Histrionics much?
