Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'll destroy nothing. Marchan acted illegally the entire time. Required to recuse and refused. Refused to allow the defense to present evidence and banned expert witnesses from testifying. Your utter stupidity on full display. You are truly ignorant of reality.What part of the case do you think he acted in a biased way?
You might bring up some of Trump's points. I will destroy those because Trump is ignorant of the law.
Other than that, he was in the spot light, everyone saw what was said, and as far as anyone can tell, there was no bias.
My response to your posts is always 'meh' as Canada should butt out of our business.
You'll destroy nothing. Marchan acted illegally the entire time. Required to recuse and refused. Refused to allow the defense to present evidence and banned expert witnesses from testifying. Your utter stupidity on full display. You are truly ignorant of reality.
apnews.com
You guys have painted yourselves into a corner with these false equivalencies.what?
They ALL seem to be saying that
leaving out the rest of it-meaning:
No one is above the law
except for us democrats
CNN legal guru says New York Trump prosecutors 'contorted the law,' case was 'unjustified mess'
CNN's Elie Honig wrote a scathing analysis that said New York prosecutors "contorted the law in an unprecedented manner" to ensnare former President Trump.www.foxnews.com
It's really something when even CNN legal commentators say, in so many words, that the Trump trial was, as this one put it, "a mess."
Then we find out that Merchan was not supposed to give even a small donation to a political candidate, but did it anyway
Wow... lawless thugs going after law-abiding citizens...
Suffice it to say that a balanced jurist would have found the long, gossamar strands between " might be a broken law" and " could be a violation" stretching from one end of this tortured bullshit to the other a suspicious stretch that smelled like politics.What part of the case do you think he acted in a biased way?
You might bring up some of Trump's points. I will destroy those because Trump is ignorant of the law.
Other than that, he was in the spot light, everyone saw what was said, and as far as anyone can tell, there was no bias.
Look at how desperate you are to make excuses.Suffice it to say that a balanced jurist would have found the long, gossamar strands between " might be a broken law" and " could be a violation" stretching from one end of this tortured bullshit to the other a suspicious stretch that smelled like politics.
Suffice it to say that a balanced jurist would have found the long, gossamar strands between " might be a broken law" and " could be a violation" stretching from one end of this tortured bullshit to the other a suspicious stretch that smelled like politics.
It was the law.Suffice it to say that a balanced jurist would have found the long, gossamar strands between " might be a broken law" and " could be a violation" stretching from one end of this tortured bullshit to the other a suspicious stretch that smelled like politics.
Suffice it to say that a balanced jurist would have found the long, gossamar strands between " might be a broken law" and " could be a violation" stretching from one end of this tortured bullshit to the other a suspicious stretch that smelled like politics.
