Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
- Thread starter
- #81
Let me ask all of you jury nullification experts a question here . . .
I get it that you think nullifying possession of marijuana laws is OK. How do you feel about a death penalty opponent who brings a capital murder case to a total halt by voting not guilty in spite of overwhelming evidence of guilt?
Or someone whose favorite uncle is doing time for a child molestation he never committed. This juror is convinced that the child molestation laws are abused with regularity, so when he finds himself on the jury in a child molestation case, he votes not guilty in spite of overwhelming evidence of guilt. I would assume y'all would have no problem with that one either, right?
See where your jury nullification nonsense can lead?
Voire dire George, what do you think it is for?