rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,368
- 158,400
- 2,615
I agreeThe prosecutor has to paint a picture of what he thinks happenedThen that is what they should have prosecuted him forThe fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murder
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Instead, they listened to rightwing hysteria and tried to prove murder
Irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor tried for. It was not murder or nothing, it was murder, manslaughter or nothing. They chose the weakest charge.
He painted a picture of intentional murder. The jury did not buy it
Fine. Then they should have found him guilty of manslaughter. How Fn stupid are people in Cali anyway?
The prosecutor was stupid to listen to rightwing hysteria