Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?The jury told meHow would you know? Were you there? Did you see him "find" a loaded gun and it going off by itself which is physically impossible?
In this country we listen to juries, not hysterical conservative media
How would a jury know? They weren't there either. A criminal telling his story doesn't make the story true because a bunch of saps decided to believe it. As they say, there's one born every minute.
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
Then that is what they should have prosecuted him forThe fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?The jury told me
In this country we listen to juries, not hysterical conservative media
How would a jury know? They weren't there either. A criminal telling his story doesn't make the story true because a bunch of saps decided to believe it. As they say, there's one born every minute.
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Then that is what they should have prosecuted him forThe fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?How would a jury know? They weren't there either. A criminal telling his story doesn't make the story true because a bunch of saps decided to believe it. As they say, there's one born every minute.
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Instead, they listened to rightwing hysteria and tried to prove murder
The fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?The jury told me
In this country we listen to juries, not hysterical conservative media
How would a jury know? They weren't there either. A criminal telling his story doesn't make the story true because a bunch of saps decided to believe it. As they say, there's one born every minute.
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
if Hillary had accidently shot her, u think she would go to jail?The fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?The jury told me
In this country we listen to juries, not hysterical conservative media
How would a jury know? They weren't there either. A criminal telling his story doesn't make the story true because a bunch of saps decided to believe it. As they say, there's one born every minute.
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
The fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?How would a jury know? They weren't there either. A criminal telling his story doesn't make the story true because a bunch of saps decided to believe it. As they say, there's one born every minute.
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Lowlifes ? I’ve got one ! Dick Chaney shot his Hunting buddy . Should he be in jail ?
This is almost exactly like Mogadishu Somalia in 93' when I was there working with the UN>People are leaving California by the millions. That right there should give many pause for thought!
Yeah . Because it’s so expensive . Because it’s successful.
I'm sorry but I will have to disagree. California is going from bad to worse, and this is not only my opinion.
you left out gender confused gerbils who feel like black womenDemocrat's current list of possible candidates......
First of all NO ONE knows it was any "accident" or he is just a bad shot? A several times convicted Felon firing a stolen Firearm in a Public place, in the city limits of SF?
That is a crime anywhere? Discharge of weapon, Manslaughter 15 years. RW keeps overlooking maybe the Prosecution botched it all on purpose? To rub dreamers into righties eyes? Ya never know with BIG GOVT HO's?
One of the Obamas' dreamers kept coming back in?
First of all NO ONE knows it was any "accident" or he is just a bad shot? A several times convicted Felon firing a stolen Firearm in a Public place, in the city limits of SF?
That is a crime anywhere? Discharge of weapon, Manslaughter 15 years. RW keeps overlooking maybe the Prosecution botched it all on purpose? To rub dreamers into righties eyes? Ya never know with BIG GOVT HO's?
One of the Obamas' dreamers kept coming back in?
The prosecutor has to paint a picture of what he thinks happenedThen that is what they should have prosecuted him forThe fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Instead, they listened to rightwing hysteria and tried to prove murder
Irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor tried for. It was not murder or nothing, it was murder, manslaughter or nothing. They chose the weakest charge.
He served over a year in jailFirst of all NO ONE knows it was any "accident" or he is just a bad shot? A several times convicted Felon firing a stolen Firearm in a Public place, in the city limits of SF?
That is a crime anywhere? Discharge of weapon, Manslaughter 15 years. RW keeps overlooking maybe the Prosecution botched it all on purpose? To rub dreamers into righties eyes? Ya never know with BIG GOVT HO's?
One of the Obamas' dreamers kept coming back in?
Exactly. I'm a true blue American who ever had so much as an outstanding parking ticket. I'm a CCW holder in my state. But if I shot somebody accidentally, I would be held responsible for my actions. I would probably end up in jail, likely sued by the person or family that I harmed, and my gun license removed for life.
An illegal comes here and shoots an American, no problem in liberal land.
The prosecutor has to paint a picture of what he thinks happenedThen that is what they should have prosecuted him forThe fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderWas Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Instead, they listened to rightwing hysteria and tried to prove murder
Irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor tried for. It was not murder or nothing, it was murder, manslaughter or nothing. They chose the weakest charge.
He painted a picture of intentional murder. The jury did not buy it
He served over a year in jailFirst of all NO ONE knows it was any "accident" or he is just a bad shot? A several times convicted Felon firing a stolen Firearm in a Public place, in the city limits of SF?
That is a crime anywhere? Discharge of weapon, Manslaughter 15 years. RW keeps overlooking maybe the Prosecution botched it all on purpose? To rub dreamers into righties eyes? Ya never know with BIG GOVT HO's?
One of the Obamas' dreamers kept coming back in?
Exactly. I'm a true blue American who ever had so much as an outstanding parking ticket. I'm a CCW holder in my state. But if I shot somebody accidentally, I would be held responsible for my actions. I would probably end up in jail, likely sued by the person or family that I harmed, and my gun license removed for life.
An illegal comes here and shoots an American, no problem in liberal land.
About what you would have gotten for an accidental shooting
Actually the first thing I took into account was the prosecution intentionally botched it.First of all NO ONE knows it was any "accident" or he is just a bad shot? A several times convicted Felon firing a stolen Firearm in a Public place, in the city limits of SF?
That is a crime anywhere? Discharge of weapon, Manslaughter 15 years. RW keeps overlooking maybe the Prosecution botched it all on purpose? To rub dreamers into righties eyes? Ya never know with BIG GOVT HO's?
One of the Obamas' dreamers kept coming back in?
The fact that he had a criminal record, was Mexican, was illegally here, was drunk has nothing to do with proving second degree murderHow would Donald Trump know?
He wasn't there
Was Trump on the jury?
This is called dealing with facts--not imagination.
Fact: This guy has a criminal record and has no respect for American laws.
Fact: He was under the influence of illegal narcotics when he shot Kate.
Fact: He was not allowed to own a gun, have a gun, or be near a gun.
Fact: He changed his story about how the shooting happened,
Fact: He was in possession of a stolen gun.
Fact: After he shot Kate, he ran and then threw the gun into the bay.
Fact: Kate is dead because of him.
Those are facts. Now, can you give me one fact (not fiction) of how he is innocent?
The prosecution could not do it
So what? They did prove that he's the one that shot her, and that alone is a minimum manslaughter charge.
He tampered with evidence, he was under disability using a firearm, he was not supposed to be in this country in the first place.
Can you name me one other country where a lowlife like this could have gotten away with such a thing?
Lowlifes ? I’ve got one ! Dick Chaney shot his Hunting buddy . Should he be in jail ?
That was a hunting accident which happens every hunting season. He had a legal gun and was legally allowed to use it. Cheney is a citizen of this country.
This lowlife was not a citizen. He's been kicked out five times prior to shooting this young American girl. He was not in the woods where shooting is legal to do, he was in a city where (supposedly) there are tough gun laws.
But it's like I've always said, liberals always side with evil and conservatives always side with the good. So please continue doing Satin's work.
accidental shooting
