RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
you know before Clinton the colors were reversed,I find it interesting that these videos always start out depicting all 50 states being red. Makes me not want to watch them. Why do they do that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you know before Clinton the colors were reversed,I find it interesting that these videos always start out depicting all 50 states being red. Makes me not want to watch them. Why do they do that?
Not sure why...and again, this analysis, anything you see on Rasmussen, which also applies historic statistical adjustments, and a few others is simply to give a logical view of reality in a world of leftist BS. You might not agree with the analysis, but at least it follows a logic the dimtards couldn't care less about providing.I find it interesting that these videos always start out depicting all 50 states being red. Makes me not want to watch them. Why do they do that?
they can only lie so much, at some point they have to tell the truth. The pollsters never showed a "trouncing". they showed Trump winning by less than 10%. A trouncing was Reagan/Mondale.If pollsters were lying a couple of months ago then why did they show Trump trouncing Biden?
That's why you look to reputable places to research actual resultsthey can only lie so much, at some point they have to tell the truth. The pollsters never showed a "trouncing". they showed Trump winning by less than 10%. A trouncing was Reagan/Mondale.
The point is that today's polls are designed to influence public opinion, not report on it. The political class has learned how to use the pollsters to their advantage.
So, they lied so much that they decided to tell the truth two months ago and have now gone back to lying again under Harris? Are you really saying that? Did it ever occur to you that dems prefer Harris to an old geeser with one foot in the grave?they can only lie so much, at some point they have to tell the truth. The pollsters never showed a "trouncing". they showed Trump winning by less than 10%. A trouncing was Reagan/Mondale.
The point is that today's polls are designed to influence public opinion, not report on it. The political class has learned how to use the pollsters to their advantage.
yes, some people prefer a semi-black female whore to a successful businessman and previous successful president. Not much can be said about the intelligence of those people.So, they lied so much that they decided to tell the truth two months ago and have now gone back to lying again under Harris? Are you really saying that? Did it ever occur to you that dems prefer Harris to an old geeser with one foot in the grave?
Yeah, but you've also got to take into account that a true Republican would never vote for a dem no matter what and true Democrats aren't going to vote for a Republican no matter what, Trump or no Trump. You're never going to make an argument to people who like democratic policies that they should vote for Trump, even without all of the lies against Trump.yes, some people prefer a semi-black female whore to a successful businessman and previous successful president. Not much can be said about the intelligence of those people.
The dems and their media partners have created a false image of Trump and many dumb people accept whatever the lying media tells them.
Not so fast.....there was a time I would certainly consider a Democrat candidate, back when both parties actually cared about our country and the Dims hadn't yet turned to pure evil. And I currently talk to a number of people who may claim to be Independent but they are truly Democrat....who will likely vote Trump as they have seen enough of this crap.Yeah, but you've also got to take into account that a true Republican would never vote for a dem no matter what and true Democrats aren't going to vote for a Republican no matter what, Trump or no Trump. You're never going to make an argument to people who like democratic policies that they should vote for Trump, even without all of the lies against Trump.
I used to be democrat then turned Republican and now turned Independent. For the most part the democratic party is gone, replaced with progressive socialists, of whom I would never vote for. So, yes, Trump needs to reach out to those so called democrats who want no part of progressive socialism. But Trump does come with a lot of baggage, some just leftist crap but also some of his own. While most of the right is ok with his bombastic style, many of those old democrats who don't want to be progressive socialists are not.Not so fast.....there was a time I would certainly consider a Democrat candidate, back when both parties actually cared about our country and the Dims hadn't yet turned to pure evil. And I currently talk to a number of people who may claim to be Independent but they are truly Democrat....who will likely vote Trump as they have seen enough of this crap.
Put that stupid Schill on ignore.They knew Pelosi did that. The investigation was a farce.
You can't take hearsay and perjured testimony and build a case from that.
There is tons of exculpatory evidence that proves Trump had nothing to do with Jan 6th.
yes, some people prefer a semi-black female whore to a successful businessman and previous successful president. Not much can be said about the intelligence of those people.