You clipped out my evidence, which was basically your words.That's what you assholes always say....and it only proves my point precisely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You clipped out my evidence, which was basically your words.That's what you assholes always say....and it only proves my point precisely.
Well now I know you are not following the actual trial. The TWO DAY trial was over Thursday, and we're awaiting verdict.The trial isn't over. They only did one day......it's not over...so stop claiming it's over.
The correct way to say it is "clearly you haven't been watching the trial".
Uh… I don’t know what to say here. It’s done and the Judge is writing up his ass whipping indictment of the plaintiffs. Book it.The trial isn't over. They only did one day......it's not over...so stop claiming it's over.
The correct way to say it is "clearly you haven't been watching the trial".
Well there is question which is why it’s in court. You’ve apparently already made up your mind because you believe whatever you hear from your propaganda media. I’ll wait and see how it goes in court and respect the turn out.There is no question that the Hobbs machine broke numerous laws, that was clear in court.
No.....that's what you do.You discard every fact of sworn testimony and simply anchor your perspective on the fact that you don’t like liberals so they must be cheating to win election. Your posts above claim all the Republicans running elections are RINO secret Democrats. It’s disconnected from reality or you are just trolling. I hope it’s the second because if you really believe the BS you’re typing you need support and some help.
What happened on day Two of this one day trial?No.....that's what you do.
Because you always have lived in a fantasy that the commies have created for you, you simple ignore the facts and make up what they call "THEIR TRUTH" to fit the agenda.
I haven't heard a decision so the trial isn't over till the judge renders a decision. They've simply finished testimony.Well now I know you are not following the actual trial. The TWO DAY trial was over Thursday, and we're awaiting verdict.
Doubtful. Most of your non obese members are now in a Washington jail.
Newsweek is irrelevant. The Judge said they needed to prove intent as step one.I haven't heard a decision so the trial isn't over till the judge renders a decision. They've simply finished testimony.
BTW, do you seriously believe that they're even going to attempt to find out what really happened during the election in two friggen days, and not make a predetermined judgement?
Newsweek claims the decision has already been made. According to them Kari Lake didn't have to just prove voter fraud.....but she had to prove that someone changed the result on purpose....not by mistake.
More threats. Form your militias at every capital on Jan 6, 2023 to show us your awesome might.You really are clueless.
This is not about your experience or your opinion. It carries 0 weight. So you know.All ballots cast last election day went through the tabulation process. Affected ballots from the Oki printers were batched and tabulated at the main election headquarters. The resulting chaos at local voting centers was compounded by the distrust over elections which had many voters insisting that their ballot be tabulated immediately. On election day I heard some voters had poll workers trying their ballots through the tabulator over-and-over again without luck. Kari Lake not only shot herself in the foot by advising her supporters to forgo mail-in voting but also struck herself squarely in the other foot with her continued bellyaching over election dishonesty. It was a card she played even in the primary when initial results weren't going her way. I can imagine what those poll workers had to put up with.
Some 30 years ago I had a problem voting caused by Maricopa County's mistake and had to cast a provisional ballot. When permanent mail-in voting became available I immediately signed up to avoid any other last-minute issue at the polling place. It's definitely the way to go despite what any candidate says. It sure is easier for me spending a few hours on the desktop researching candidates and issues while filling out my ballot. I always hated that feeling in the voting booth questioning what made me decide for this guy or that.
Proving intent rather than purposeful incompetence is next to impossible.Newsweek is irrelevant. The Judge said they needed to prove intent as step one.
They weren't. They were retained and then scanned in after recopy under the direction of a bipartisan team. All ballots were counted.It is not a fantasy. Those machines failed. 19 inch ballots will be rejected every time.
Those ballots could have been changed by poll workers. That is a fact. The election ballots on demand were made that way on purpose.They weren't. They were retained and then scanned in after recopy under the direction of a bipartisan team. All ballots were counted.
No evidence of fraud was submitted either.Proving intent rather than purposeful incompetence is next to impossible.
But you folks will claim there's no evidence of fraud, which they proved, and no evidence that Republican voters were disenfranchised, which there was.
The Maracopa election board intentionally fudged the election to change the election results....and the person who benefitted from it was Katie Hobbs. This election never should have taken place while she was running it.
More threats. Form your militias at every capital on Jan 6, 2023 to show us your awesome might.
Bring all your friends. Bring all your guns. Show us how badass you are.
Cool. Let's see em Jan 6. Terrify us with your awesome power.Militias? What militias. You have to worry about the hundreds of thousands of former veterans who are getting ever more pissed about this treasonous government.
Remember, dummy, they swore an oath to defend the CONSTITUTION, not some piece of shit politician, from all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC.
Never, ever, forget that.
No evidence of fraud was submitted either.
They had to prove intentional efforts to to disenfranchise. They found neither intent nor disenfranchisement.Wasn't what they were trying to prove.
Proving you were not watching the trial at all.
Cool. Let's see em Jan 6. Terrify us with your awesome power.