Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,743
Hobbs does nothing; she has an IQ of 0.
That doesn't speak well of Lake then, since Hobbs beat her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hobbs does nothing; she has an IQ of 0.
They copied 19” ballots onto 20” ballots.Retard, I literally showed you an article from before the election stating their ballots are 20 inches...
The various text sizes on the county’s 20-inch-long ballots...
Cons are ineducable.
So they say.Rejected ballots are reviewed by a bipartisan team. You claiming the Republican members of those teams wouldn't allow votes for Kari Lake to be counted? If so, you have evidence to support that?
Nope. A technician in ONE of the locations trying to fix the printer issue, tried setting the printer on the Shrink to Fit, setting....for about 1 hour I believe I read, which the Shrink to Fit paper size setting shrunk it to the 19", no one put in 19", and this happened after the printer issues began, as mentioned, to see if that setting would fix or help the situation.
So they say.
You believe everything you read…
YouTube…Do you ever watch a video of an actual event?!LOL
And from where did read the ballots were only 19"?
![]()
Not according to the courts and your non-commie judgeFacts are not conspiracies.
Hobbs crippled voting machines in republican districts.
The judge did say that; he said there was no proof of malicious intent.Not according to the courts and your non-commie judge
And the election was Stolen from Her.And she is an Olympic Gold Medalist WINNER!!!
A quality education?![]()
It’s amazing how you guys are absolutely convinced elections are fraudulent when not a scrap of evidence exists.The question is no longer whether these elections are rigged, or whether the judiciary has become compliant and corrupt. The sole issue is navigating the New America where elections are fraudulent and justice depends on your political posture. This is a future in which America has never been great and no one, absolutely, wants it to be great again.
Yes, I read that as well! And it turns out three of the technicians tried the Shrink to fit mode, not just one....The most reliable fix reported was removing the toner cartridge, shaking it, then putting it back in.
This should be fun to watch....
![]()
SANCTIONS SCOREBOARD: Keeping Track Of Arizona's 2020-22 Election Case Aftermaths
Nonprofit news and podcast about Arizona legal news & courts. Opinions/decisions, including Arizona Supreme Court, 9th Circuit, U.S. Supreme Court.arizonaslaw.blogspot.com
They will, it is done incrementally. It takes time to remove freedom from a nation as big as ours.Filing a lawsuit and challenging election results as she did are cometely legal. There are existing, legal means to do so, which she did. So why should she be punished for exercising those legal means?
To try to do so is nothing more than an attempted threat / warning to others not to pursue legal existing methods for challenging election irregularities / results.
If Democrats want to strip Americans of legal ways to challenge suspected election fraud / crime why don't they just pass laws making it illegal to do so?
Why would I ignore the judges ruling?!The judge did say that; he said there was no proof of malicious intent.
You may now ignore the judge’s ruling.
Taking two random factors (ballot paper size that affected zero votes and hearsay that they heard some people brought in family member ballots) neither which were nefarious, illegal, nor impacted the election and asking the results to be thrown out is the crime. I hope the lawyers go broke and are ostracized from the legal community just like Trumps lawyers were so that next time they don’t lie to the public and have a trial for show with no facts.Filing a lawsuit and challenging election results as she did are cometely legal. There are existing, legal means to do so, which she did. So why should she be punished for exercising those legal means?
To try to do so is nothing more than an attempted threat / warning to others not to pursue legal existing methods for challenging election irregularities / results.
If Democrats want to strip Americans of legal ways to challenge suspected election fraud / crime why don't they just pass laws making it illegal to do so?
I'm still amazed that any lawyers take this shit on. These HAVE to be desperate people.Taking two random factors (ballot paper size that affected zero votes and hearsay that they heard some people brought in family member ballots) neither which were nefarious, illegal, nor impacted the election and asking the results to be thrown out is the crime. I hope the lawyers go broke and are ostracized from the legal community just like Trumps lawyers were so that next time they don’t lie to the public and have a trial for show with no facts.
Russia can show us the way.We need bigger political prisons.
I have never seen lawyers violate the maxim, don't ask a question you don't know the answer to.I'm still amazed that any lawyers take this shit on. These HAVE to be desperate people.
No cities were "burnt down" you ignorant assI must be living in a parallel universe. Democrats burnt down cities in 2020. But made-up imaginary accusations about Trump and feed into costly billion $ january 6th investigations. investigating a three-hour event. Same assholes that rejected Trumps vaccine then flip flopped and made it mandatory months later. Did I miss something?