Kate Steinle murderer found not guilty of murder.

[bodecea]

Fox News let down their base

They had a beautiful blonde woman killed
They had a scary looking Mexican illegal to blame

What they didn’t have was a murder case

The acquittal of murder of a pretty White girl by a filthy ass minority kinds of reminds you of the OJ Simspson case, doesn't it?

Maybe the Illegal will write a book one day entitled "I didn't Do It But If I Had This Is How It Would Have Happen".

So...as we see...this is only concerning because it was a "pretty white girl".

Perhaps because it was one less for those charming 30+ year old men in the South?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Catholics are Christians you stupid fuck

Lol

No they are not, retard. They are heretics..end.of.story.

You have to be the most retarded person in the world I am a damn Catholic, I have two uncles that are priest, I have great aunts that are penguin's.

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Ah so you are a retarded protestant, well that's your problem

 

[JoeB131]

Sending him to prison doesn't seem to be the problem ... He has been there several times.
The fact they keep letting him out and back into the country and residing in this country under the benefit of a sanctuary city is where the problem comes from.

No, the problem is that we have an economy that has a hunger for undocumented laborers. He's just a byproduct.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What would you call the multiple time felon and person who admittedly pulled the trigger that fired the gun that killed Kate? Her hairdresser?

someone involved in a horrible accident.

We have 33,000 gun deaths a year, and won't enact even the most common sense gun control.

We have had the laws on the books for almost 50 years niether party wants to enforce them.

 

[Flash]

[Q

Again, the facts did not support a charge of murder

Can you provide any facts that show intent?

No, you are confused Moon Bat.

The "facts" only interpreted by queer Moon Bat San Francisco assholes. Three of them illegals.

The dumbasses accepted the "I was only shooting at Sea Lions" malarkey. Typical for the Libtard idiots that live in San Francisco.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Catholics are Christians you stupid fuck

Lol

No they are not, retard. They are heretics..end.of.story.

You have to be the most retarded person in the world I am a damn Catholic, I have two uncles that are priest, I have great aunts that are penguin's.

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Yeah except Catholics are the original Christians. That's like Religion 101 dude

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Cut the shit; you liberals don't give a fuck about her. You just hate hearing any negative results about your open borders sickness and the 3rd-world subhumans you traitors love to venerate.

I worry about all of the 33,000 Americans who die every year because of gun violence.

why is this one so special?

" I worry about all of the 33,000 Americans who die every year because of gun violence "

I call bullshit...you are just virtue signaling to feel good about yourself and nothing more.

 

[BlackSand]

I GET it. I am not advocating for illegals being here. I am commenting on the murder charge. That requires intent. He could have been in prison for manslaughter right now.

Sending him to prison doesn't seem to be the problem ... He has been there several times.
The fact they keep letting him out and back into the country is where the problem comes from.

.

I thought his prison time was for selling $20 worth of marijuana and being an illegal immigrant

What other crimes did he commit?

He was busted three times in Washington for felony heroin possession.
He was busted for illegal re-entry in Texas, Arizona and California.

He was in jail and scheduled for deportation ... When San Fransico's sanctuary city related ordinances set him free and he subsequently killed Kate.
He spent a great deal of his time in this country in jail or prison on multiple occasions.

Government incompetence ...

.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

No they are not, retard. They are heretics..end.of.story.

You have to be the most retarded person in the world I am a damn Catholic, I have two uncles that are priest, I have great aunts that are penguin's.

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Yeah except Catholics are the original Christians. That's like Religion 101 dude

No they are not.

 

[JoeB131]

"Calling an illegal alien an undocumented alien is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist."

Hmmm... you might have stumbled onto something here.

BOTH exist because of a demand.

We have drug dealers because people want them some drugs.

We have undocumented immigrants because people want them some laborers who will do hard work for little or no money.

and when politicians tell us to be angry about these things with offering real solutions, guys like you get sooooo angry and overuse the adjective "filthy" a lot.

then they'll go score some weed and watch those guys they hired at the Home Depot Parking Lot do the hard work.

 

[Flash]

Good thing that either that asshole Obama or that shithead Crooked Hillary are not President. Either one of them would have immediately granted the murderer and his extended family citizenship, invited him to the White House and give him $3 million in restitution with the apologies of the American people..

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

No they are not, retard. They are heretics..end.of.story.

You have to be the most retarded person in the world I am a damn Catholic, I have two uncles that are priest, I have great aunts that are penguin's.

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Ah so you are a retarded protestant, well that's your problem

Smarter than your "damned catholic" ass. Lol

 

[bodecea]

You have to be the most retarded person in the world I am a damn Catholic, I have two uncles that are priest, I have great aunts that are penguin's.

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Yeah except Catholics are the original Christians. That's like Religion 101 dude

No they are not.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You have to be the most retarded person in the world I am a damn Catholic, I have two uncles that are priest, I have great aunts that are penguin's.

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Yeah except Catholics are the original Christians. That's like Religion 101 dude

No they are not.

Yeah they are, dope.

Simple, who did Christ tell He would build his Church upon? Who was the first Pope?

All the others are Johnny Come Lately

You lose, have a good day

 

[JoeB131]

He was busted three times in Washington for felony heroine possession.
He was busted for illegal re-entry in Texas, Arizona and California.

He was in jail and scheduled for deportation ... When San Fransico's sanctuary city related ordinances set him free and he subsequently killed Kate.

Except that ICE wasn't in any big hurry to deport him, were they?

 

[BlackSand]

Except that ICE wasn't in any big hurry to deport him, were they?

ICE signed the deportation order ... San Francisco ignored it and set him free ...

.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I don't give a shit if you and your whole family are heretics.

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Yeah except Catholics are the original Christians. That's like Religion 101 dude

No they are not.

Yeah they are, dope.

Simple, who did Christ tell He would build his Church upon? Who was the first Pope?

All the others are Johnny Come Lately

You lose, have a good day

Hahaha! So much wrong....


" Question: "What does the Bible say about the pope / papacy?"

Answer: The Roman Catholic Church’s teaching about the pope (“pope” means “father”) is built upon and involves the following Roman Catholic teachings:

1) Christ made Peter the leader of the apostles and of the church (Matthew 16:18-19). In giving Peter the “keys of the kingdom,” Christ not only made him leader, but also made him infallible when he acted or spoke as Christ’s representative on earth (speaking from the seat of authority, or “ex cathedra”). This ability to act on behalf of the church in an infallible way when speaking “ex cathedra” was passed on to Peter’s successors, thus giving the church an infallible guide on earth. The purpose of the papacy is to lead the church unerringly.

2) Peter later became the first bishop of Rome. As bishop of Rome, he exercised authority over all other bishops and church leaders. The teaching that the bishop of Rome is above all other bishops in authority is referred to as the “primacy” of the Roman bishop.

3) Peter passed on his apostolic authority to the next bishop of Rome, along with the other apostles who passed on their apostolic authority to the bishops that they ordained. These new bishops, in turn, passed on that apostolic authority to those bishops that they later ordained, and so on. This “passing on of apostolic authority” is referred to as “apostolic succession.”

4) Based upon the claim of an unbroken chain of Roman bishops, Roman Catholics teach that the Roman Catholic Church is the true church, and that all churches that do not accept the primacy of the pope have broken away from them, the original and one true church.

Having briefly reviewed some of the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church concerning the papacy, the question is whether those teachings are in agreement with Scripture. The Roman Catholic Church sees the papacy and the infallible teaching authority of “Mother Church” as being necessary to guide the church, and uses that as logical reasoning for God’s provision of it. But in examining Scripture, we find the following:

1) While Peter was central in the early spread of the gospel (part of the meaning behind Matthew 16:18-19), the teaching of Scripture, taken in context, nowhere declares that he was in authority over the other apostles or over the church (see Acts 15:1-23; Galatians 2:1-14; 1 Peter 5:1-5). Nor is it ever taught that the bishop of Rome was to have primacy over the church. Rather, there is only one reference in Scripture of Peter writing from “Babylon,” a name sometimes applied to Rome, found in 1 Peter 5:13. Primarily from this, and the historical rise of the influence of the bishop of Rome (due to the support of Constantine and the Roman emperors who followed him), come the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching of the primacy of the bishop of Rome. However, Scripture shows that Peter’s authority was shared by the other apostles (Ephesians 2:19-20) and that the “loosing and binding” authority attributed to him was likewise shared by the local churches, not just their church leaders (see Matthew 18:15-19; 1 Corinthians 5:1-13; 2 Corinthians 13:10; Titus 2:15; 3:10-11).

2) Nowhere does Scripture state that in order to keep the church from error, the authority of the apostles was passed on to those they ordained (the idea behind apostolic succession). Apostolic succession is “read into” those verses that the Roman Catholic Church uses to support this doctrine (2 Timothy 2:2; 4:2-5; Titus 1:5; 2:1; 2:15; 1 Timothy 5:19-22). What Scripture DOES teach is that false teachings would arise even from among church leaders and that Christians were to compare the teachings of these later church leaders with Scripture, which alone is cited in the Bible as infallible. The Bible does not teach that the apostles were infallible, apart from what was written by them and incorporated into Scripture. Paul, in talking to the church leaders in the large city of Ephesus, makes note of coming false teachers. Paul does NOT commend them to “the apostles and those who would carry on their authority,” but rather to “God and to the word of His grace” (Acts 20:28-32).

Again, the Bible teaches that it is Scripture that is to be used as measuring stick to determine truth from error. In Galatians 1:8-9, Paul states that it is not WHO teaches but WHAT is being taught that is to be used to determine truth from error. While the Roman Catholic Church continues to pronounce a curse to hell, or “anathema,” upon those who would reject the authority of the pope, Scripture reserves that curse for those who would teach a different gospel (Galatians 1:8-9).

3) While the Roman Catholic Church sees apostolic succession as logically necessary in order for God to unerringly guide the church, Scripture states that God has provided for His church through the following:

(a) Infallible Scripture, (Acts 20:32; 2 Timothy 3:15-17; Matthew 5:18; John 10:35; Acts 17:10-12; Isaiah 8:20; 40:8; etc.) Note: Peter speaks of Paul’s writings in the same category as other Scripture (2 Peter 3:16),

(b) Christ’s unending high-priesthood in heaven (Hebrews 7:22-28),

(c) The provision of the Holy Spirit who guided the apostles into truth after Christ’s death (John 16:12-14), who gifts believers for the work of the ministry, including teaching (Romans 12:3-8; Ephesians 4:11-16), and who uses the written Word as His chief tool (Hebrews 4:12; Ephesians 6:17).

While there have seemingly been good (humanly speaking) and moral men who have served as pope of the Roman Catholic Church—some point to Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, and Pope Francis I as examples—the Roman Catholic teaching about the office of the pope should be rejected because it is not “in continuity” with the teachings of the New Testament. This comparison of any church’s teaching is essential, lest we miss the New Testament’s teaching concerning the gospel and not only miss eternal life in heaven ourselves but unwittingly lead others down the wrong path (Galatians 1:8-9)"

 

[JoeB131]

We have had the laws on the books for almost 50 years niether party wants to enforce them.

Or- get this- the people don't really want them enforced.

Hey, here's how you stop the illegal alien problem. You stop hiring them.

You stop hiring a gaggle of them at the Home Depot Parking Lot to finish hanging your drywall.

You stop hiring them to watch your kids because you are too busy with your career.

You stop hiring them to work in your sweatshop because you don't want to pay minimum wage to people who are here legally.

But since we don't want to pay good money to get these things done, we have this market for cheap labor, and these immigrants are filling them, hoping to get better life for their kids...

You know, just like our ancestors did when they came here.

 

[Peach]

Just can it, A young woman died, and the State could not get even convict on "manslaughter" or "reckless endangerment". Possession of a firearm by a felon only carries 3 years in California? That is wrong.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You don't even know the definition of Christian do you, needle dick?

Chris·tian
ˈkrisCHən/
adjective

1. 1.
   relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.
   "the Christian Church"

noun

1. 1.
   a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.

Lol....they do not believe in Jesus Christ's teachings. They teach heretical doctrines that go directly against Jesus's teachings. I'm really surprised there are still people like you out there who have never encountered this argument against Catholicism being considered a christian denomination...it's been around for a very, very long time.

Should Roman Catholicism Be Considered a Christian Religion? | John Ankerberg Show

Yeah except Catholics are the original Christians. That's like Religion 101 dude

No they are not.

Yeah they are, dope.

Simple, who did Christ tell He would build his Church upon? Who was the first Pope?

All the others are Johnny Come Lately

You lose, have a good day

Hahaha! So much wrong....


" Question: "What does the Bible say about the pope / papacy?"

Answer: The Roman Catholic Church’s teaching about the pope (“pope” means “father”) is built upon and involves the following Roman Catholic teachings:

1) Christ made Peter the leader of the apostles and of the church (Matthew 16:18-19). In giving Peter the “keys of the kingdom,” Christ not only made him leader, but also made him infallible when he acted or spoke as Christ’s representative on earth (speaking from the seat of authority, or “ex cathedra”). This ability to act on behalf of the church in an infallible way when speaking “ex cathedra” was passed on to Peter’s successors, thus giving the church an infallible guide on earth. The purpose of the papacy is to lead the church unerringly.

2) Peter later became the first bishop of Rome. As bishop of Rome, he exercised authority over all other bishops and church leaders. The teaching that the bishop of Rome is above all other bishops in authority is referred to as the “primacy” of the Roman bishop.

3) Peter passed on his apostolic authority to the next bishop of Rome, along with the other apostles who passed on their apostolic authority to the bishops that they ordained. These new bishops, in turn, passed on that apostolic authority to those bishops that they later ordained, and so on. This “passing on of apostolic authority” is referred to as “apostolic succession.”

4) Based upon the claim of an unbroken chain of Roman bishops, Roman Catholics teach that the Roman Catholic Church is the true church, and that all churches that do not accept the primacy of the pope have broken away from them, the original and one true church.

Having briefly reviewed some of the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church concerning the papacy, the question is whether those teachings are in agreement with Scripture. The Roman Catholic Church sees the papacy and the infallible teaching authority of “Mother Church” as being necessary to guide the church, and uses that as logical reasoning for God’s provision of it. But in examining Scripture, we find the following:

1) While Peter was central in the early spread of the gospel (part of the meaning behind Matthew 16:18-19), the teaching of Scripture, taken in context, nowhere declares that he was in authority over the other apostles or over the church (see Acts 15:1-23; Galatians 2:1-14; 1 Peter 5:1-5). Nor is it ever taught that the bishop of Rome was to have primacy over the church. Rather, there is only one reference in Scripture of Peter writing from “Babylon,” a name sometimes applied to Rome, found in 1 Peter 5:13. Primarily from this, and the historical rise of the influence of the bishop of Rome (due to the support of Constantine and the Roman emperors who followed him), come the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching of the primacy of the bishop of Rome. However, Scripture shows that Peter’s authority was shared by the other apostles (Ephesians 2:19-20) and that the “loosing and binding” authority attributed to him was likewise shared by the local churches, not just their church leaders (see Matthew 18:15-19; 1 Corinthians 5:1-13; 2 Corinthians 13:10; Titus 2:15; 3:10-11).

2) Nowhere does Scripture state that in order to keep the church from error, the authority of the apostles was passed on to those they ordained (the idea behind apostolic succession). Apostolic succession is “read into” those verses that the Roman Catholic Church uses to support this doctrine (2 Timothy 2:2; 4:2-5; Titus 1:5; 2:1; 2:15; 1 Timothy 5:19-22). What Scripture DOES teach is that false teachings would arise even from among church leaders and that Christians were to compare the teachings of these later church leaders with Scripture, which alone is cited in the Bible as infallible. The Bible does not teach that the apostles were infallible, apart from what was written by them and incorporated into Scripture. Paul, in talking to the church leaders in the large city of Ephesus, makes note of coming false teachers. Paul does NOT commend them to “the apostles and those who would carry on their authority,” but rather to “God and to the word of His grace” (Acts 20:28-32).

Again, the Bible teaches that it is Scripture that is to be used as measuring stick to determine truth from error. In Galatians 1:8-9, Paul states that it is not WHO teaches but WHAT is being taught that is to be used to determine truth from error. While the Roman Catholic Church continues to pronounce a curse to hell, or “anathema,” upon those who would reject the authority of the pope, Scripture reserves that curse for those who would teach a different gospel (Galatians 1:8-9).

3) While the Roman Catholic Church sees apostolic succession as logically necessary in order for God to unerringly guide the church, Scripture states that God has provided for His church through the following:

(a) Infallible Scripture, (Acts 20:32; 2 Timothy 3:15-17; Matthew 5:18; John 10:35; Acts 17:10-12; Isaiah 8:20; 40:8; etc.) Note: Peter speaks of Paul’s writings in the same category as other Scripture (2 Peter 3:16),

(b) Christ’s unending high-priesthood in heaven (Hebrews 7:22-28),

(c) The provision of the Holy Spirit who guided the apostles into truth after Christ’s death (John 16:12-14), who gifts believers for the work of the ministry, including teaching (Romans 12:3-8; Ephesians 4:11-16), and who uses the written Word as His chief tool (Hebrews 4:12; Ephesians 6:17).

While there have seemingly been good (humanly speaking) and moral men who have served as pope of the Roman Catholic Church—some point to Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, and Pope Francis I as examples—the Roman Catholic teaching about the office of the pope should be rejected because it is not “in continuity” with the teachings of the New Testament. This comparison of any church’s teaching is essential, lest we miss the New Testament’s teaching concerning the gospel and not only miss eternal life in heaven ourselves but unwittingly lead others down the wrong path (Galatians 1:8-9)"

I know better and am not going to read your mini novel post.

You're quoting anti Catholic BS.

Bye