Kavanaugh/Ford Opinon threads from Saturday, Sept 23, 2018

[Billy_Bob]

Read all about it first here.

Females M'GAGA: College classmate says Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at Yale party! SWEET!

And then read the truth here.....

First, Ramirez says she was completely inebriated when the misconduct supposedly occurred.

Second, she told the New Yorker she wasn’t certain what happened until “after six days of talking with her attorney” a former elected Democrat. According to Farrow and Mayer, “in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, [Ramirez] was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.” But one can do plenty of brain washing in six days.

We’ve all heard of the “MeToo” movement. Now we have the “MeToo, My Democrat Attorney Thinks” movement.
someone did
Third, Ramirez doesn’t even claim she saw Kavanaugh do anything; only that someone yelled out that Brett had done something.

Fourth, none of the other dozen people the New Yorker contacted said that Kavanaugh was even at the party where the misconduct allegedly occurred, let alone that misconduct actually occurred.

Fifth, multiple other students went on the record disputing that this happened.

For these reasons, this latest ambush, at least as reported by Farrow and Mayer, doesn’t rise to the level of something the Judiciary Committee should consider.

So, sexual assault is a free pass for men when the target is"completely inebriated". SO MAGA DOPER AMERICA OF YOU!

Hearing about someone exposing himself is not sexual assault.

LEWDNESS IS A MISDEMEANOR..

My God these people have fucking lost it...

And now the creepy porn lawyer is on TV saying he HAS ONE TOO..

 

[caddo kid]

Avenatti claims client has 'credible information' on Kavanaugh, ex-classmate

Michael Avenatti, the lawyer representing adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, announced Sunday that he is representing a client with “credible information” regarding Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and his former classmate, Mark Judge.

“I represent a woman with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” Avenatti said on Twitter. “We will be demanding the opportunity to present testimony to the committee and will likewise be demanding that Judge and others be subpoenaed to testify.”

“The nomination must be withdrawn,” he added.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the 'so called' third woman.

This guy is a joke who is just looking for headlines for his run against Trump in 2020.

His statements have been proven to be right so far.

Name one

The 'Cohen Tapes': Another Avenatti Prediction Proven Right

 

[blackhawk]

Of course you read the parts of the articles where she admits she was very drunk at the party and there significant gaps in her memory of the events and much like with Fords allegations many of the people there say it didn't happen have no recollection of it or heard about it second hand.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Btw.....what do DUMS on this thread think about the allegation against Ellison? Toss him?

If your a Republican its #METOO if your a democrat its #NOTYOU.... Just ask Keith Elison's accuser who has been trashed...

 

[caddo kid]

More that will protect the president from being indicted who will vote against Roe V Wade?/

Kavanaugh is one of the most level headed on RvW of the group, I doubt he would vote against it. 2/3 of the rest are 100% assured to do so.

Respect your opinions and posts but imo trump would never have picked him if he was pro R v W

Trump is not anti-abortion, he only "changed" his stance when he decided to run for POTUS as a Repub. Trump does not have any desire to see RvW over turned, hell he might have chosen him for that very reason.

Trump says a lot of things, most of which are not true. He says what people want to hear, that way they cheer for him even more. I am surprised you have not figured that out about him

I have stated for a VERY LONG time, Trump is a liar. We actually agree on that.

A liar cannot be trusted, period.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The Fucking LEFTARDS have nothing so they are making every accusation they can no matter how frivolous...

 

[edward37]

Gator you don't think Trump put up the best POS in his quiver??

I think Kavanaugh was one of the best from his list of choices, there are far more partisan, ideologicaly driven people on there than Kavanaugh

More that will protect the president from being indicted who will vote against Roe V Wade?/

Kavanaugh is one of the most level headed on RvW of the group, I doubt he would vote against it. 2/3 of the rest are 100% assured to do so.

Respect your opinions and posts but imo trump would never have picked him if he was pro R v W

Trump is not anti-abortion, he only "changed" his stance when he decided to run for POTUS as a Repub. Trump does not have any desire to see RvW over turned, hell he might have chosen him for that very reason.

My belief was that in order to solidify the evangelists vote he promised them an anti choice guy

 

[WillowTree]

Let it happen! This evil shit will explode back into their smarmy faces!

The don't stop at anything. How these losers can get up there and lie through their teeth is beyond me.... Oh wait they are unemotional punta's . Desensitized pos losers after all they will abort a human life twenty times in one month if they had to.

Are you watching Mark Levin? He is showing those memos that Leahy was whining about being stolen!

 

[Billy_Bob]

I feel sorry for this woman. She admits this wasn't a actual sexual assault and whatever it was happened 30 years ago. I don't care anymore. I know , I know the #whyididntrespond movement. I have been there too, and OK, the good old boy intimidation club, yes I have seen that first hand. This seems a little handy dandy convenient. Don't you think?

More than that......

First, Ramirez says she was completely inebriated when the misconduct supposedly occurred.

Second, she told the New Yorker she wasn’t certain what happened until “after six days of talking with her attorney” a former elected Democrat. According to Farrow and Mayer, “in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, [Ramirez] was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.” But one can do plenty of brain washing in six days.

We’ve all heard of the “MeToo” movement. Now we have the “MeToo, My Democrat Attorney Thinks” movement.

Third, Ramirez doesn’t even claim she saw Kavanaugh do anything; only that someone yelled out that Brett had done something.

Fourth, none of the other dozen people the New Yorker contacted said that Kavanaugh was even at the party where the misconduct allegedly occurred, let alone that misconduct actually occurred.

Fifth, multiple other students went on the record disputing that this happened.

For these reasons, this latest ambush, at least as reported by Farrow and Mayer, doesn’t rise to the level of something the Judiciary Committee should consider.

I feel sorry for this woman. She admits this wasn't a actual sexual assault and whatever it was happened 30 years ago. I don't care anymore. I know , I know the #whyididntrespond movement. I have been there too, and OK, the good old boy intimidation club, yes I have seen that first hand. This seems a little handy dandy convenient. Don't you think?

More than that......

First, Ramirez says she was completely inebriated when the misconduct supposedly occurred.

Second, she told the New Yorker she wasn’t certain what happened until “after six days of talking with her attorney” a former elected Democrat. According to Farrow and Mayer, “in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, [Ramirez] was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.” But one can do plenty of brain washing in six days.

We’ve all heard of the “MeToo” movement. Now we have the “MeToo, My Democrat Attorney Thinks” movement.

Third, Ramirez doesn’t even claim she saw Kavanaugh do anything; only that someone yelled out that Brett had done something.

Fourth, none of the other dozen people the New Yorker contacted said that Kavanaugh was even at the party where the misconduct allegedly occurred, let alone that misconduct actually occurred.

Fifth, multiple other students went on the record disputing that this happened.

For these reasons, this latest ambush, at least as reported by Farrow and Mayer, doesn’t rise to the level of something the Judiciary Committee should consider.

She has no witnesses including herself.

The standard has dropped from " she said/he said " to " she heard someone say something / he said "

And that is all it takes to smear a man.

And more ......

BREAKING: Second Woman Makes Accusations Against Kavanaugh As Doubts Over Ford's Claims Grow

The New Yorker adds that "Ramirez acknowledged that there are significant gaps in her memories of the evening, and that, if she ever presents her story to the F.B.I. or members of the Senate, she will inevitably be pressed on her motivation for coming forward after so many years, and questioned about her memory, given her drinking at the party."

The left-wing magazine admits that it "has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."

So the story this is based on? The reporters released the story without confirming with other eyewitnesses if Kavanaugh was even at the party.......but they had to release the story before Monday...

Interesting Kava is never at a party as a blackout drunk. Or ever.
btw: I recall getting to FREE beer/drinks at a party, was my goal.

And if you look into Kavanaugh he never went to those parties as his witlessness have attested to..... so these people are fucking nuts...

 

[WillowTree]

 

[edward37]

More that will protect the president from being indicted who will vote against Roe V Wade?/

Kavanaugh is one of the most level headed on RvW of the group, I doubt he would vote against it. 2/3 of the rest are 100% assured to do so.

Respect your opinions and posts but imo trump would never have picked him if he was pro R v W

Trump is not anti-abortion, he only "changed" his stance when he decided to run for POTUS as a Repub. Trump does not have any desire to see RvW over turned, hell he might have chosen him for that very reason.

Trump says a lot of things, most of which are not true. He says what people want to hear, that way they cheer for him even more. I am surprised you have not figured that out about him

I've posted numerous times he lies every time he opens his mouth

 

[Baz Ares]

DANG! FFS!

Ed Whelan takes leave of absence from Ethics and Public Policy Center after claim Brett Kavanaugh accuser misidentified alleged attacker - CNNPolitics


LOL! MAGA non-ALT-facts are cumming together,

 

[Soupnazi630]

I feel sorry for this woman. She admits this wasn't a actual sexual assault and whatever it was happened 30 years ago. I don't care anymore. I know , I know the #whyididntrespond movement. I have been there too, and OK, the good old boy intimidation club, yes I have seen that first hand. This seems a little handy dandy convenient. Don't you think?

More than that......

First, Ramirez says she was completely inebriated when the misconduct supposedly occurred.

Second, she told the New Yorker she wasn’t certain what happened until “after six days of talking with her attorney” a former elected Democrat. According to Farrow and Mayer, “in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, [Ramirez] was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.” But one can do plenty of brain washing in six days.

We’ve all heard of the “MeToo” movement. Now we have the “MeToo, My Democrat Attorney Thinks” movement.

Third, Ramirez doesn’t even claim she saw Kavanaugh do anything; only that someone yelled out that Brett had done something.

Fourth, none of the other dozen people the New Yorker contacted said that Kavanaugh was even at the party where the misconduct allegedly occurred, let alone that misconduct actually occurred.

Fifth, multiple other students went on the record disputing that this happened.

For these reasons, this latest ambush, at least as reported by Farrow and Mayer, doesn’t rise to the level of something the Judiciary Committee should consider.

I feel sorry for this woman. She admits this wasn't a actual sexual assault and whatever it was happened 30 years ago. I don't care anymore. I know , I know the #whyididntrespond movement. I have been there too, and OK, the good old boy intimidation club, yes I have seen that first hand. This seems a little handy dandy convenient. Don't you think?

More than that......

First, Ramirez says she was completely inebriated when the misconduct supposedly occurred.

Second, she told the New Yorker she wasn’t certain what happened until “after six days of talking with her attorney” a former elected Democrat. According to Farrow and Mayer, “in her initial conversations with The New Yorker, [Ramirez] was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.” But one can do plenty of brain washing in six days.

We’ve all heard of the “MeToo” movement. Now we have the “MeToo, My Democrat Attorney Thinks” movement.

Third, Ramirez doesn’t even claim she saw Kavanaugh do anything; only that someone yelled out that Brett had done something.

Fourth, none of the other dozen people the New Yorker contacted said that Kavanaugh was even at the party where the misconduct allegedly occurred, let alone that misconduct actually occurred.

Fifth, multiple other students went on the record disputing that this happened.

For these reasons, this latest ambush, at least as reported by Farrow and Mayer, doesn’t rise to the level of something the Judiciary Committee should consider.

She has no witnesses including herself.

The standard has dropped from " she said/he said " to " she heard someone say something / he said "

And that is all it takes to smear a man.

And more ......

BREAKING: Second Woman Makes Accusations Against Kavanaugh As Doubts Over Ford's Claims Grow

The New Yorker adds that "Ramirez acknowledged that there are significant gaps in her memories of the evening, and that, if she ever presents her story to the F.B.I. or members of the Senate, she will inevitably be pressed on her motivation for coming forward after so many years, and questioned about her memory, given her drinking at the party."

The left-wing magazine admits that it "has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."

So the story this is based on? The reporters released the story without confirming with other eyewitnesses if Kavanaugh was even at the party.......but they had to release the story before Monday...

Interesting Kava is never at a party as a blackout drunk. Or ever.
btw: I recall getting to FREE beer/drinks at a party, was my goal.

Yes as some one said he could be an amazing bank robber.

He gets accused and no evidence or witness can place him there. Twice.

Now of course any intelligent person would conclude the accusations are fale.

But leftists ignore that

 

[LoneLaugher]

You shouldn't.

But you should want to know if what she says is true.

You don't.

Look inward.

She doesn't even know its true

-Geaux

You've made up your mind.

To be fair, that's pretty light work.

 

[MaryL]

I am channeling Bill Clinton.HE pulls his pants down AND discretion goes out the window. Perhaps Monica was willing, but that's not the issue. An acting representative of the people acting like a horny teenager in rut. Really? OK, liberals excuse that. Men have "urges," and we have to shrug our shoulders and accept it. But heaven forfend if they are Republicans, they must be perfect angels. I would hope so, ALL our representatives should be held to that same high standard.

 

[hadit]

Whatever it is it's not rape.

Right, it's attempted rape.

You misspelled alleged.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Wow, more breaking news about Kavanaugh. Doesn't look good...

Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Brett Kavanaugh’s, has described a dormitory party gone awry and a drunken incident that she wants the F.B.I. to investigate.

She remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.” She recalled another male student shouting about the incident. “Somebody yelled down the hall, ‘Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie’s face,’ ” she said. “It was his full name. I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.’ And I remember hearing and being mortified that this was out there.”

Senate Democrats Investigate a New Sexual-Misconduct Allegation Against Brett Kavanaugh

Total bullshit. No way a drunk guy is yelling "Brett Kavanaugh", way too many letters for a drunk guy to get out. They would have called him by whatever nickname he had.

She blew it when she threw in that little lie. I was a drunk durng the late 80s and early 90s, and nobody every called anyone by their full name.

plus she said...."It was his full name. I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.".....she doesnt think it was just Brett....not going to fly,she is going to have to be sure....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whatever it is it's not rape.

Right, it's attempted rape.

You misspelled alleged.

No, I omitted it. For your pleasure: The allegation is attempted rape.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Now we need to let her testify. Sounds like we should wait until after the election.

Hmmm

 

[jon_berzerk]

Are these new allegations as credible as the last set?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

even less