Kentucky Clerk Jailed for Contempt of Court

Kentucky exists in reality. In reality, Marriage is the joining of One Man and One Woman... as God created humanity with two distinct, but complimenting genders; each designed SPECIFICALLY to JOIN WITH the OTHER... Forming ONE SUSTAINABLE BODY... from two... and Kentucky's CONSTITUTION recognizes the right of the citizen to exercise their religion, ABOVE ALL OTHER CONSIDERATION... INCLUDING: THE LAW!

Reality is that same-sex couple can enter into Civil Marriage just like the rest of us.

Reality is that same-sex couples can enter into Religious Marriage and the number of Churches and religious organizations accepting them is growing.


That is reality.


>>>>
It is indeed. And the queers' ability to get married is in no way hampered by leaving off the name of the people who don't care to endorse their revolting, depraved and sacrilegious coupling.
Her name IS off the licenses.

That's not good enough for her.

Her name is not off the licenses.

She is the Clerk of the Court... The Clerk's office issues the licenses... therefore everything that the Clerks office does, bears her name.
Yup. And removing her name is perfectly do-able. It's just a clerical/administrative tweak that would cost almost nothing and resolve everything.

But that's not what homo Nazis want. They want to make Christians crawl, and if they won't, they want them in jail.

More fools they.
 
Kim Davis is an idiotic Religionist mental midget ...God laughs at her outlandish claims to know what God's views are...God rejects Dixie flag Right wing slags ...
 
Wrong.

In this matter Davis' job is to acknowledge the Constitution.

Which she is doing: Amendment1: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
This just in:
"Although a federal judge ordered she not interfere with the issuance of marriage licenses, her legal team said her mind "has not changed," and she intends to block gay couples from getting licenses once again."

Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis Plans To Go Back To Work On Monday

Toldja so.

She's a Gawd Warrior, with the cross on her back and ready to push to have the nails of Geezuz pushed through her wrists to fight this thing to the Bigot Bucks end.

What happened this past week is only Act 1.
And if she ends up back on jail she'll have only herself to blame.
 
Kentucky exists in reality. In reality, Marriage is the joining of One Man and One Woman... as God created humanity with two distinct, but complimenting genders; each designed SPECIFICALLY to JOIN WITH the OTHER... Forming ONE SUSTAINABLE BODY... from two... and Kentucky's CONSTITUTION recognizes the right of the citizen to exercise their religion, ABOVE ALL OTHER CONSIDERATION... INCLUDING: THE LAW!

Reality is that same-sex couple can enter into Civil Marriage just like the rest of us.

Reality is that same-sex couples can enter into Religious Marriage and the number of Churches and religious organizations accepting them is growing.


That is reality.


>>>>
It is indeed. And the queers' ability to get married is in no way hampered by leaving off the name of the people who don't care to endorse their revolting, depraved and sacrilegious coupling.
Her name IS off the licenses.

That's not good enough for her.

Her name is not off the licenses.

She is the Clerk of the Court... The Clerk's office issues the licenses... therefore everything that the Clerks office does, bears her name.
Yup. And removing her name is perfectly do-able. It's just a clerical/administrative tweak that would cost almost nothing and resolve everything.

But that's not what homo Nazis want. They want to make Christians crawl, and if they won't, they want them in jail.

More fools they.

She's the Clerk of Courts, as long as she is the Clerk of the Court and the Clerks office issues licenses... her name is part and parcel of every action taken by HER OFFICE.

What she SHOULD DO, is what she IS DOING: REFUSE TO ISSUE LICENSES TO UNQUALIFIED CANDIDATES. As Marriage IS: The Joining of One Man and One Woman.
 
This just in:
"Although a federal judge ordered she not interfere with the issuance of marriage licenses, her legal team said her mind "has not changed," and she intends to block gay couples from getting licenses once again."

Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis Plans To Go Back To Work On Monday

Toldja so.

She's a Gawd Warrior, with the cross on her back and ready to push to have the nails of Geezuz pushed through her wrists to fight this thing to the Bigot Bucks end.

What happened this past week is only Act 1.
And if she ends up back on jail she'll have only herself to blame.

She isn't going back to jail... The Next time the Court tries to jail her, there will be blood spilled in defense of American Principle.
 
Reality is that same-sex couple can enter into Civil Marriage just like the rest of us.

Reality is that same-sex couples can enter into Religious Marriage and the number of Churches and religious organizations accepting them is growing.


That is reality.


>>>>
It is indeed. And the queers' ability to get married is in no way hampered by leaving off the name of the people who don't care to endorse their revolting, depraved and sacrilegious coupling.
Her name IS off the licenses.

That's not good enough for her.

Her name is not off the licenses.

She is the Clerk of the Court... The Clerk's office issues the licenses... therefore everything that the Clerks office does, bears her name.
Yup. And removing her name is perfectly do-able. It's just a clerical/administrative tweak that would cost almost nothing and resolve everything.

But that's not what homo Nazis want. They want to make Christians crawl, and if they won't, they want them in jail.

More fools they.

She's the Clerk of Courts, as long as she is the Clerk of the Court and the Clerks office issues licenses... her name is part and parcel of every action taken by HER OFFICE.

What she SHOULD DO, is what she IS DOING: REFUSE TO ISSUE LICENSES TO UNQUALIFIED CANDIDATES. As Marriage IS: The Joining of One Man and One Woman.

She is under no obligation to do anything to prevent them from marrying. But she has the right not to endorse it, even if her job is to issue license, based on her closely held personal conviction that issuing marriage licenses to gays is an act of sacrilege, and her soul is in danger if she endorses it. The licenses may still be issued by the office WITHOUT HER NAME printed on the forms. She has said from the beginning that this would be acceptable to her. It is a reasonable accommodation.

It's funny that you can't get one homonazi to say anything about Tonya Parker, who refused for YEARS to marry anybody (which is exactly what Kim Davis did) based on her closely held, personal belief that it would be wrong to issue licenses until she could issue them to fags as well. Nobody sued her. Nobody dragged her to court. Nobody threw her in jail. She hasn't received death threats. And nobody on the left will say that if what she did was right, then what Davis is doing is right.

And that is the truth. That judge had the right to do that.

And so does this court admin.
 
She isn't going back to jail... The Next time the Court tries to jail her, there will be blood spilled in defense of American Principle.


waahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha you are blow hard ...she interferes with civil Rights she is going back in the slammer..No none of those Dixie Flag flying slave mongers are going to bleed...lol
 
Reality is that same-sex couple can enter into Civil Marriage just like the rest of us.

Reality is that same-sex couples can enter into Religious Marriage and the number of Churches and religious organizations accepting them is growing.


That is reality.


>>>>
It is indeed. And the queers' ability to get married is in no way hampered by leaving off the name of the people who don't care to endorse their revolting, depraved and sacrilegious coupling.
Her name IS off the licenses.

That's not good enough for her.

Her name is not off the licenses.

She is the Clerk of the Court... The Clerk's office issues the licenses... therefore everything that the Clerks office does, bears her name.

Her name is Satan!

Yes... Satan is standing up for God's law.

You've clearly given this a lot of thought.

LOL! Folks you can NOT hide the anti-theist (Douchebags)... they simply will not allow it.

God's law? I keep hearing about this God person. Who is this God person? Can you provide some "credible" proof that such a person exists?
 
Wed Sep 09, 2015 at 08:47 AM PDT

Rowan County deputy clerk goes rogue—pledges to follow the judge's orders, not Kim Davis
mason_copy.jpg

Brian Mason is breaking free of the crazy in Kentucky
 
It is indeed. And the queers' ability to get married is in no way hampered by leaving off the name of the people who don't care to endorse their revolting, depraved and sacrilegious coupling.
Her name IS off the licenses.

That's not good enough for her.

Her name is not off the licenses.

She is the Clerk of the Court... The Clerk's office issues the licenses... therefore everything that the Clerks office does, bears her name.
Yup. And removing her name is perfectly do-able. It's just a clerical/administrative tweak that would cost almost nothing and resolve everything.

But that's not what homo Nazis want. They want to make Christians crawl, and if they won't, they want them in jail.

More fools they.

She's the Clerk of Courts, as long as she is the Clerk of the Court and the Clerks office issues licenses... her name is part and parcel of every action taken by HER OFFICE.

What she SHOULD DO, is what she IS DOING: REFUSE TO ISSUE LICENSES TO UNQUALIFIED CANDIDATES. As Marriage IS: The Joining of One Man and One Woman.

She is under no obligation to do anything to prevent them from marrying.

I agree completely.

But as long as she is the Clerk, her name is intrinsic to ALL business done by the Clerk's office.

Now, if they remove such licenses from the purvey of the Clerk's office... she's good to go and bear no responsibility for such.
 
God's law? I keep hearing about this God person. Who is this God person? Can you provide some "credible" proof that such a person exists?
At the bottom line these crazed fools want "God's Word" to belong to them and to inflict their version of "God's will" on people....I reject the Christian fools who try to inflict their ignorance on Society...
 
...Again -- she IS the government. The government does not act out in civil disobedience, which is an act against the government. That's why you're wrong and she sits in a cell.
And there, apparently, is the gist of the difference in positions.

You (apparently) believe that it is impossible for a member of the government to engage in Civil Disobedience while on-duty.

I believe that is it possible for a member of the government to refuse to conform to an immoral law, while on-duty, and that, in doing so, she is engaged in an act of Civil Disobedience.

I believe that Davis is in jail because - member of the government or no - she is engaged in an act of Civil Disobedience.

Doesn't mean she's right.

Doesn't mean that she can't be charged with a failure to execute or for contempt.

It's just the label that we hang on her actions.

You (and others less sympathetic) label it as Simple Lawbreaking.

I (and others more sympathetic) label it as Civil Disobedience - which has much the same effect, at-law, but which suggests a nobler purpose and self-sacrifice.

An appellation that you-and-yours are desperate to try to suppress, for fear that it will gain enough traction to become irreversible in the collective public psyche.

And, if that's the case, I think you're already too late.

She's already been awarded the mantle of hero and martyr.

Sucks, eh?
wink_smile.gif
Kim Davis's office is obligated to perform the state function of issuing marriage licenses. She disagrees that marriage can exist between two people of the same sex. However, the state of Kentucky has little choice other than to respect the ruling of the Supreme Court. Davis's opinion is completely irrelevant to performance of her job. If she will not allow her office to preform their function, then she has to go just like any employee who finds their conscience will not allow them to do their job.

The State of Kentucky has every choice to reject the irrational, irrefutably unconstitutional decree by the newly formed Supreme Legislature.

Davis's Job is to follow Kentucky law.

Kentucky Law defines Marriage as the Joining of One Man and One Woman.
Wrong.

In this matter Davis' job is to acknowledge the Constitution, Article VI in particular, obey the Supreme Court, and follow the rule of law, where by doing so in no way 'violates' her religious liberty.

Federal laws, the rulings of the Supreme Court, and Constitutional jurisprudence are the supreme law of the land, where state and local laws are subordinate to that.
So which law did she violate? You Leftwats have yet to answer that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top