Ketanji Should Be Disqualified

[otto105]

If there is no God then why do you serve Satan and preach The Devil’s doctrine and get angry at the notion there is a God?

You will see God, but only on judgment day when you are forever cast away from Him.

You have a choice to escape that fate but you will reject your only hope.

Nope.

Not going to happen.

 

[lantern2814]

mat gaetz flew around the US with a 17 year old girl who was not related to him. His buddy in Florida has already admitted guilt in acquiring girls for him.

BTW show where Supreme Court justice Jackson was out of the mainstream.

Critics of Jackson's child sex abuse sentences backed judges with similar records

The Facts on Judge Jackson’s Sentencing in Child Porn Cases - FactCheck.org

So you have nothing involving children with Gaetz. Thanks for the confirmation. No other judges apologized to perps and openly whined that they couldn’t give even lighter sentences. Amazing to see the usual suspects here defending groomers and sexualizing children. Or maybe not.....

 

[Rigby5]

The question was about her personal view, and her personal view, seems be that she does not know what a woman is. That is simply ludicrous. An honest judge is an honest judge and Ketanji is not being honest when she says she honestly cannot define what a woman is, IMO.

Again NO ONE can define what a woman is.
Again, there are at least 3 different criteria that can be in conflict.
One is chromosomes.
Two is genitalia at birth.
Three is puberty that produces mental sexual orientation and proclivities.

All 3 normally are supposed to be in synch, but any one or more can be out of synch.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I don't see how?
If gender is relevant, then there has to be testimony to establish gender.
It is NEVER appropriate for a judge to apply their existing prejudice in any court case.

If you’re talking Title IX but gender can’t be established then no case can be brought. If the new female justice (named after two men, BTW) can’t determine gender then it would be impossible for her to judge on any Title IX case.
Simple logic.

 

[Leo123]

Again NO ONE can define what a woman is.
Again, there are at least 3 different criteria that can be in conflict.
One is chromosomes.
Two is genitalia at birth.
Three is puberty that produces mental sexual orientation and proclivities.

All 3 normally are supposed to be in synch, but any one or more can be out of synch.

Oh bullshit. Everyone know what a woman is. Except you, I guess.

 

[Leo123]

If you’re talking Title IX but gender can’t be established then no case can be brought. If the new female justice (named after two men, BTW) can’t determine gender then it would be impossible for her to judge on any Title IX case.
Simple logic.

Logic has nothing to do with transgender.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Wrong.
First of all, they likely got programmed wrong somehow, and a psychologist may be able to actually fix that.
Second is that prison may only serve to increase their sexual opportunities, making them rewarded instead of deterred.
Prisons are NOT isolating at all, and are the opposite, with much closer crowding than normal.

Prisons don’t have children. Duh.
I doubt that pedophelia is any more psychological or learned than homosexuality or booger-eating.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Her record is one of those "inconvenient truths" you Lefties like to champion. People who support her and those like her may get rear-ended by Karma someday. I don't wish having your kids or grandkids molested but it's a FACT that she has a pattern of going soft on that particular abomination.

 

[Leo123]

Wrong again.
I am disappointed, since I would think you would have gotten it by now.
Developmental advantages of testosterone does NOT necessarily mean the person is a man.
It could simply mean the glands of the woman are defective and product too much testosterone and too little estrogen.
(all men and all women produce some testosterone and some estrogen, just very different amounts.)
If they accidentally got the wrong hormone by accident, I would not let them compete in sports where they may have an unfair advantage, but that does not mean I would necessarily force anything else on them.
Just let them be what gender they felt from puberty, and do corrective surgery if they want it.

And again MOST people do not have defective glands. Sorry, I am not playing on your falsely expanded field.

 

[DukeU]

Wrong.
It does not at work because the word "female" is just as ambiguous as woman, so establishes nothing at all.
It does not define chromosomes, genitalia, psychology, or hormones.

It has worked for thousands of years. All of a sudden, it don't.

 

[miketx]

A brain-body disconnect is an adverse condition that should treated as a handicap, not seen as a normal condition.

 

[Rigby5]

Sorry bout that,

1. A real women knows she's a women and can give comfort to a man, hope that clears things up for you all.
2. A real good women knows her place is beside a good man.
3. G-D Bless good women.
4. A women can bring forth a wonderful gift to a man, a boy, or a girl, or both, maybe a pair of each.
5. A real women gives herself to her man wholeheartedly.
6. What a precious wonderful gift a women brings.
7. Thats what a women is.
8. That person who will sit on the SC chair is not a women.
9. Is she a biologist?
10. Insinuating only a biologist knows what a women is, she is so without understanding, G-D Bless Her Heart.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

That is silly and easily disproven.
In fact, it is so silly, at first I thought it was satire.

All you have to image in order to disprove your list, is to consider a female girl who has been violently sexually assaulted when young.
The they will likely fail 1 by NOT want to or be able to "give comfort to a man".
Their place likely will never be "beside a good man", so 2 is off.
5 is also off, as they likely will never "give herself to any man wholeheartedly".

Or are you implying that a woman traumatized by a rapist is no longer a woman?

 

[DukeU]

If hormone poisoning during fetal development causes the wrong genitalia, no one can tell visually.
You have to examine chromosomes.

So, you're saying there is a difference?!? Thanks

 

[Rigby5]

It has worked for thousands of years. All of a sudden, it don't.

Wrong.
It is just that for thousands of years those few who did not have all sexual criteria matching, simply had to hide it.
They had to pretend, because society was to immature to be able to handle the real life nuances of biology.

 

[Rigby5]

View attachment 628402

It does not matter what value judgement you put on something.
Sure I would agree a brain/body mismatch is likely a handicap.
But the point is you still have to allow for it, since it does happen.
And it would be best if you allowed them to be as happy as possible.

 

[Leo123]

Wrong.
It is just that for thousands of years those few who did not have all sexual criteria matching, simply had to hide it.
They had to pretend, because society was to immature to be able to handle the real life nuances of biology.

That is complete bullshit. There have been homosexuals in every civilization. They have always been accepted but considered aberrant as they should have been. Hell, today we have very popular and famous homosexuals. No one is persecuting them. No, this whole 'acceptance' of homosexuals is for child grooming purposes based on a false allegory that heterosexual individuals have some kind of hate for homosexuals. According to radical leftists, not agreeing with their radical points of view is called being bigoted or homophobic.

 

[Rigby5]

So, you're saying there is a difference?!? Thanks

Sure there are differences.
But again, there are 3 different criteria at least, chromosome, genitalia, and puberty hormones and proclivities.
So which do you use, when there is a mismatch?
I would likely go with the puberty proclivities, since the physical is not that important with the lights out.

 

[DukeU]

Wrong.
It is just that for thousands of years those few who did not have all sexual criteria matching, simply had to hide it.
They had to pretend, because society was to immature to be able to handle the real life nuances of biology.

Now they pretend to be something they're not.

 

[DukeU]

Sure there are differences.
But again, there are 3 different criteria at least, chromosome, genitalia, and puberty hormones and proclivities.
So which do you use, when there is a mismatch?
I would likely go with the puberty proclivities, since the physical is not that important with the lights out.

What are we to do about the animals? We've been mis-gendering them all along.

Poor things.

 

[Leo123]

Sure there are differences.
But again, there are 3 different criteria at least, chromosome, genitalia, and puberty hormones and proclivities.
So which do you use, when there is a mismatch?
I would likely go with the puberty proclivities, since the physical is not that important with the lights out.

Mismatches are very rare.