Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s semantics, not law.
The problem is this: The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution. That's all.
Wrong. The 14th Amendment is the most abused twisted Amendment to the Constitution. It is twisted to refer to almost anything that the left wants. You know what the purpose and intent of the 14th Amendment was, yet you and the rest of your clan will twist it to YOUR INTENT.Wrong, completely and totally.
All judges are supposed to mainly protect individual rights, and are ONLY supposed to interpret the constitution as a way of protecting individual rights.
If for example the constitution got something wrong, like not preventing slavery, then the courts are supposed to correct that.
Which is why the Dredd Scott Decision was wrong.
We all realize that now.
And that has been obvious since the 14th amendment, which explicitly told the federal courts to protect individual rights from abuse by the states.
How was slavery settled?Wrong, completely and totally.
All judges are supposed to mainly protect individual rights, and are ONLY supposed to interpret the constitution as a way of protecting individual rights.
If for example the constitution got something wrong, like not preventing slavery, then the courts are supposed to correct that.
Which is why the Dredd Scott Decision was wrong.
We all realize that now.
And that has been obvious since the 14th amendment, which explicitly told the federal courts to protect individual rights from abuse by the states.
Encouraging people to do something illegal by volunteering to pay their legal fees. Of course you don’t see anything wrong with that because Trump did it.Man twice bailed out by Kamala Harris-backed fund — gets arrested again
Why would you have a problem with paying for someone's legal fees?
www.factcheck.org
Wrong. The 14th Amendment is the most abused twisted Amendment to the Constitution. It is twisted to refer to almost anything that the left wants. You know what the purpose and intent of the 14th Amendment was, yet you and the rest of your clan will twist it to YOUR INTENT.
How was slavery settled?
So the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery? So you admit that the 14th Amendment is about rights for ex slaves and their descendants.I do not believe the Emancipation Proclamation is what ended slavery because it only applied to the South.
I believe the 14th amendment is what ended the inequality of rights protection that is slavery.
If legality is subject solely to judicial interpretation then there is no legislation. Only judicial decree.When legislators write illegal legislation or fail to write legislation to defend individual rights, then judges are SUPPOSED to legislate from the bench.
That is essential to law, and has always been.
Originally there was no legislation at all, and judges had to go entirely by precedent.
We called it Common Law.
We adopted the British Common Law when we formed the US.
There are lots of individual rights that are still not legislated, like privacy.
And you could NEVER possibly legislate all rights, because they are infinite.
Judges will ALWAYS have to essentially legislate from the bench, to some degree.
That is why it is so important who we pick to be judges.
Then it needs to go through the legislative process at that point. It’s up to those elected by the people, not appointed by a dictator.Fine, sure, judges do have to essentially legislate.
That is because legislators can not see the future and can not anticipate all circumstances that can come up.
Exceptions to legislation will always come up, and judges will always need to be able to nullify legislation when necessary.
The bench interpreted law, it didn’t make it. Laws had to be re-legislated at that point.If you want an example of where the bench HAD to make law, it was the school segregation of the 1970s.
States were the guilty party of unequal schools for Blacks, so the federal courts had to stop them from being separate.
I did not like school busing, but it worked.
We must give them space to destroy.Encouraging people to do something illegal by volunteering to pay their legal fees. Of course you don’t see anything wrong with that because Trump did it.
Graham Twists Facts on Harris Support for Protesters - FactCheck.org
Sen. Lindsey Graham twisted the facts about then-Sen. Kamala Harris encouraging donations to pay bail for protesters to claim “she actually bailed out rioters," including one who "went back to the streets and broke somebody’s head open."
Yeah I know she is now on SCOTUS but, why the FUCK is this regime applauding a woman that can't define what a woman is? Does that mean if a Woman is involved in a SCOTUS case she will have to recuse herself? One would think that, and her past record of leniency for pedophiles, would have precluded her from nomination in the first place but, Joe Biden is a political hack and cares not one iota for the American People.
What the fuck does that question have to do with her education, qualifications and experience as a candidate for the Supreme Court? The Answer: Absolutely nothing.
Has any other candidate for the SC, man or woman, ever been asked this question? The Answer: No, never.
Why is ANYONE asking the most qualified person, man or woman, to be nominated for the SC since Chief Justice Roberts, such a stupid question?
Why not be honest and admit you call her out because she is black. Do you have any professional experience as I do in the Criminal Justice System?Her record is one of those "inconvenient truths" you Lefties like to champion. People who support her and those like her may get rear-ended by Karma someday. I don't wish having your kids or grandkids molested but it's a FACT that she has a pattern of going soft on that particular abomination.
Yeah question the question when you can’t explain the answer.What the fuck does that question have to do with her education, qualifications and experience as a candidate for the Supreme Court? The Answer: Absolutely nothing.
Has any other candidate for the SC, man or woman, ever been asked this question? The Answer: No, never.
Why is ANYONE asking the most qualified person, man or woman, to be nominated for the SC since Chief Justice Roberts, such a stupid question?
Maybe they should have asked her if she liked beer and how many rape chains she over saw.What the fuck does that question have to do with her education, qualifications and experience as a candidate for the Supreme Court? The Answer: Absolutely nothing.
Has any other candidate for the SC, man or woman, ever been asked this question? The Answer: No, never.
Why is ANYONE asking the most qualified person, man or woman, to be nominated for the SC since Chief Justice Roberts, such a stupid question?
So the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery? So you admit that the 14th Amendment is about rights for ex slaves and their descendants.
