AceRothstein
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2012
- 5,978
- 1,441
- 245
No the innocent little child was not shot in the back judging from that picture.
![]()
Because you can see his entire back in that picture? I'm going to reserve judgment on the original incident until we have more info but you can't say with 100% certainty that he wasn't shot in the back based on the picture provided.
Enough is visible to determine if he'd been shot. Have you ever shot anything in your life? Did you know that a lot of blood comes out of a GSW. Look at the blood on the ground. where did it come from? A tiny hole in his back? Come on now, you have to have better sense than that.
You can't see a third of his back as he is on an angle, the blood could have flowed down off the body away from the way the picture was taken. I don't expect it to flow upwards, towards where the picture was taken from.
I'm not saying he was definitely shot in the back, just that the picture shown is not definitive.