TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #541
If they are so persecuted how come our President is Christian...You keep whining how conservatives/christians are persecuted but you fail to produce a shred of evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they are so persecuted how come our President is Christian...You keep whining how conservatives/christians are persecuted but you fail to produce a shred of evidence.
Hyperbole, Birther? Good description of your post right there.It's pure hyperbole.....and I believe that extremism that we've seen on display will cause a backlash.If you think OPPRESSION is telling someone to go to the 3rd street office instead of this one to get the license, I think you're using hyperbole.“Martin Luther King was actually in opposition to the church’s unwillingness to support the oppressed,”MLK was fighting hate and bigotry. Kim Davis is using her religion to spread hate and bigotry.
MLK was fighting for Christian principles, so is Davis. MLK would not have condoned gay marriage.
“Kim Davis, on the other hand, is using her church to oppress people even more.”
Larry said it best ^
It's not hyperbolic to expect the clerk of the county in which you pay taxes to provide the goods and services you pay taxes for. I pay taxes in the county where I was born, raised and live and work again. I wanted to be married in that same county. I should not have to travel to a neighboring county than the one where I live and PAY TAXES.
My guess is these assholes picked her office because opposition research proved that Kim Davis held this belief. I think the whole thing was a bloody setup from the beginning.
Yeah, you also guess that the President wasn't born in this country. Your guesses are ridiculous.
Instead of working with people, liberals like stomping them into the ground.
This simple fact is what is turning the issue against you, unfortunately. You may have the upper-hand now, but down the road, it may blow up in your faces, which is a shame. Too bad the radicals just can't learn to get along with those they hate.
Yes, she's a Democrat. No one is denying that.I guess the left found another democrat that they don't like. Funny isn't it, that a democrat is alledgedly abusing her governmental power and the left hates on her. Pretty well blows away the southern strategy BS. The democrat statists stayed exactly where they belong, in the democrat party.
BTW, Zimmerman was a democrat also.
The WH has been refusing to issue marriage licenses for years, Birther?Throwing someone in jail for something that the WhiteHouse has been doing for years isn't radical?It's pure hyperbole.....and I believe that extremism that we've seen on display will cause a backlash.If you think OPPRESSION is telling someone to go to the 3rd street office instead of this one to get the license, I think you're using hyperbole.“Martin Luther King was actually in opposition to the church’s unwillingness to support the oppressed,”
“Kim Davis, on the other hand, is using her church to oppress people even more.”
Larry said it best ^
It's not hyperbolic to expect the clerk of the county in which you pay taxes to provide the goods and services you pay taxes for. I pay taxes in the county where I was born, raised and live and work again. I wanted to be married in that same county. I should not have to travel to a neighboring county than the one where I live and PAY TAXES.
My guess is these assholes picked her office because opposition research proved that Kim Davis held this belief. I think the whole thing was a bloody setup from the beginning.
Yeah, you also guess that the President wasn't born in this country. Your guesses are ridiculous.
Instead of working with people, liberals like stomping them into the ground.
This simple fact is what is turning the issue against you, unfortunately. You may have the upper-hand now, but down the road, it may blow up in your faces, which is a shame. Too bad the radicals just can't learn to get along with those they hate.
It wasn't liberals or gays that caused Miss Davis's woes, it was Miss Davis. She is the one that would not work with people. Despite there being people in her office willing to issue licenses to gay couples, she would not allow that to happen. She would not allow any religious accommodation to be made for her.
She is the one who is being radical and trying to impose her religion on her secular government office.
Give me a break.
Yes, yes...we know you are a Birther and Birthers are cray cray.And Democrats voted for a closet Muslim/homosexual, community-agitator, communist radical......so the result was predicted long before big ears won the nomination in 2008.You get what you voted for. You voted for a religious zealot who doesn't believe in gay marriage.If you think OPPRESSION is telling someone to go to the 3rd street office instead of this one to get the license, I think you're using hyperbole.“Martin Luther King was actually in opposition to the church’s unwillingness to support the oppressed,”MLK was fighting for Christian principles, so is Davis. MLK would not have condoned gay marriage.
“Kim Davis, on the other hand, is using her church to oppress people even more.”
Larry said it best ^
It's not hyperbolic to expect the clerk of the county in which you pay taxes to provide the goods and services you pay taxes for. I pay taxes in the county where I was born, raised and live and work again. I wanted to be married in that same county. I should not have to travel to a neighboring county than the one where I live and PAY TAXES.
My guess is these assholes picked her office because opposition research proved that Kim Davis held this belief. I think the whole thing was a bloody setup from the beginning.
Yeah, you also guess that the President wasn't born in this country. Your guesses are ridiculous.
We've seen plenty of evidence....and the guilty parties have claimed the 5th.
As it is, nothing will be truly investigated till that criminal goes back to being a full-time community-organizer.
What a load of dingos' kidneys, Birther. Got anymore good stories?They refused to issue tax-free status to conservatives.....refuse to enforce immigration laws....refused to prosecute for various crimes they feel weren't crimes.Throwing someone in jail for something that the WhiteHouse has been doing for years isn't radical?
Give me a break.
The white house refuses to issue marriage licenses to gay people?
Obvious double-standards are in play here.
If they are so persecuted how come our President is Christian...
You've run to your ODS Happy Place, Birther?Strawman argument.They refused to issue tax-free status to conservatives.....refuse to enforce immigration laws....refused to prosecute for various crimes they feel weren't crimes.
Obvious double-standards are in play here.
Obviously you guys should impeach the illegal, kenyan, commie, muslim without a birth certificate.
Obviously you also haven't got any evidence
Obviously you'll just have to live with it
He didn't produce his original BC for a reason.
But it's irrelevant, because his mother is a United States citizen.....so at the very least, he would have dual-citizenship....and the most he is a US citizen.
I think you're too stupid to realize this.....cuz you keep bringing up this drivel.
If they are so persecuted how come our President is Christian...
Come on, you know damn well Obama is a secret muslim
He drinks beer and eats Barbecue pork ...hahIf they are so persecuted how come our President is Christian...
Come on, you know damn well Obama is a secret muslim
The SCOTUS decision was not in error. Sorry, but you lose. We are also citizens on an equal footing with you. I know....it sucks to have to recognize that we aren't somehow less. But suck it up, Buttercup.Your guess would be wrong, Birther....all those people, gay and straight, live in that county and have the right to get services from their county. However, Huckabee and Cruz are NOT from that county...what are THEY doing there?
If the June 2105 Decision was in error, which it was, the KY law still applies to its own citizens. Same goes with every other state.
Besides the SCOTUS designating a new class of people to add to the Constitution's special protections (just some deviant sex behaviors but not others), and the fact that this is outside their scope of power, we have the fact that Ginsburg and Kagan were in vilation of Massey Coal 2009's finding that no judge, none, zero, may manifest undeniable bias on a case that is pending before them.
Kagan and Ginsburg while the question of "should the fed preside over states on the question of legality of gay marriage" presided publicly over gay marriages. Ergo displaying their clear and undeniable slant on the question before it was Heard. Which is a violation of law.
At least he's not Catholic....that would be worse....what with under the thrall of the Pope and all those pedophile priests.If they are so persecuted how come our President is Christian...
Come on, you know damn well Obama is a secret muslim
It's not much of a secret to those paying attention
He drinks beer and eats Barbecue pork ...hah
They would be demanding a Birth certificate...long form...He drinks beer and eats Barbecue pork ...hah
He got a special dispensation from the mullahs to maintain his cover. Can you imagine the outrage if it became know he was a muslim?
The SCOTUS decision was not in error. Sorry, but you lose. We are also citizens on an equal footing with you. I know....it sucks to have to recognize that we aren't somehow less. But suck it up, Buttercup.Your guess would be wrong, Birther....all those people, gay and straight, live in that county and have the right to get services from their county. However, Huckabee and Cruz are NOT from that county...what are THEY doing there?
If the June 2105 Decision was in error, which it was, the KY law still applies to its own citizens. Same goes with every other state.
Besides the SCOTUS designating a new class of people to add to the Constitution's special protections (just some deviant sex behaviors but not others), and the fact that this is outside their scope of power, we have the fact that Ginsburg and Kagan were in vilation of Massey Coal 2009's finding that no judge, none, zero, may manifest undeniable bias on a case that is pending before them.
Kagan and Ginsburg while the question of "should the fed preside over states on the question of legality of gay marriage" presided publicly over gay marriages. Ergo displaying their clear and undeniable slant on the question before it was Heard. Which is a violation of law.