Known Terrorists Currently Living in the USA

[Obiwan]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

So you're saying Obama lied... AGAIN .
Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

 

[JimBowie1958]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

Who the hell do you think yo are lying to? People actually follow these subjects and can google them now, so your libtard bullshit doesn't mojo any more, dude.

When Bush left office Iraq was relatively stable compared to what it had been under one of the worst military dictatorships the world has seen.

Yeah, Iraq was peaceful under Sadam,....like a graveyard peaceful. That mad man was known among world leaders for gassing his own people to death, beheading his critics and imposing massive repression. But according to libtards, none of that is so bad as long as you aren't being ruled by white people.

 

[Camp]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

So you're saying Obama lied... AGAIN .
Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

Bush left office in January 2009. Combat troops continued operations in Iraq for three more years after he left. Those three years were the years that put the US in a position to honor the agreement made by Bush to end combat operations.

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. You deny those troops credit and acknowledgement just so you can exercise your Obama derangement by refusing to admit he brought the war to an end. You loose and dishonor those troops in the lie that Bush ended the war before he left office.

 

[Geaux4it]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

So you're saying Obama lied... AGAIN .
Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

Bush left office in January 2009. Combat troops continued operations in Iraq for three more years after he left. Those three years were the years that put the US in a position to honor the agreement made by Bush to end combat operations.

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. You deny those troops credit and acknowledgement just so you can exercise your Obama derangement by refusing to admit he brought the war to an end. You loose and dishonor those troops in the lie that Bush ended the war before he left office.

How many of those wounds were at the hands of Iran?

-Geaux

 

[JimBowie1958]

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

That is complete and unqualified twaddle.

You fight the war, then you win the war, then you fight to win the following peace.

We have been losing about 1,000 servicemen's lives every year since the end of WW2 and knowing that we had a secure nation does not discredit nor diminish a single one of them, dude.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

So you're saying Obama lied... AGAIN .
Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

Bush left office in January 2009. Combat troops continued operations in Iraq for three more years after he left. Those three years were the years that put the US in a position to honor the agreement made by Bush to end combat operations.

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. You deny those troops credit and acknowledgement just so you can exercise your Obama derangement by refusing to admit he brought the war to an end. You loose and dishonor those troops in the lie that Bush ended the war before he left office.

How many of those wounds were at the hands of Iran?

-Geaux

Iran doesn't count any more cause now its our ally, along with the ExSoviets and Chicom.

Strange new World isn't it?

 

[Camp]

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

That is complete and unqualified twaddle.

You fight the war, then you win the war, then you fight to win the following peace.

We have been losing about 1,000 servicemen's lives every year since the end of WW2 and knowing that we had a secure nation does not discredit nor diminish a single one of them, dude.

You are desperate for excuses. All anyone has to do is look at the casualty list to see that the war was not over. The first year after Bush left saw 149 US KIA's. The following years 60 (2010) and 54 (2011).

Your comparison to WWII is to desperately dumb to even offer a response.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

That is complete and unqualified twaddle.

You fight the war, then you win the war, then you fight to win the following peace.

We have been losing about 1,000 servicemen's lives every year since the end of WW2 and knowing that we had a secure nation does not discredit nor diminish a single one of them, dude.

You are desperate for excuses. All anyone has to do is look at the casualty list to see that the war was not over. The first year after Bush left saw 149 US KIA's. The following years 60 (2010) and 54 (2011).

Your comparison to WWII is to desperately dumb to even offer a response.

Me desperate for excuses when all I did was relay FACTs to you? roflmao

Which of my facts are you questioning, or was that just more libtard broiler plate bullshit?

FACT: we have been losing about 1,000 men dying in peacetime from various causes since the end of WW2 as our global commitments have expanded our training in a wild variety of environments.

FACT: Iraq and Afghanistan were in much better shape in 2007 than they are now due to basic predictable blunders by the Obama regime because they don't have a thimble of military experience ont he whole WH staff.

FACT: Iraq is falling apart, Afghanistan is heading toward Taliban control and the Obama regime cannot even beat the JV team in the form of ISIS.

FACT you stupid ass mouth breathing idiots are fucking around with wild fire and that violence is coming here to OUR SHORES, you stupid freak.,

Take a look at some of it.



Libtard stupidity, incompetence, apathy and disdain will NOT be forgotten, nor forgiven.

 

[Camp]

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

So you're saying Obama lied... AGAIN .
Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

Bush left office in January 2009. Combat troops continued operations in Iraq for three more years after he left. Those three years were the years that put the US in a position to honor the agreement made by Bush to end combat operations.

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. You deny those troops credit and acknowledgement just so you can exercise your Obama derangement by refusing to admit he brought the war to an end. You loose and dishonor those troops in the lie that Bush ended the war before he left office.

How many of those wounds were at the hands of Iran?

-Geaux

Iran doesn't count any more cause now its our ally, along with the ExSoviets and Chicom.

Strange new World isn't it?

The action and casualties occurred in Iraq, not Iran. The stability of Iran is not being challenged. The claim of stability in Iraq after Bush left office is the topic. It really doesn't effect the analysis of the stability of Iraq during that period if some of the disruption was being caused by Iranian supported Iraqi's.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The action and casualties occurred in Iraq, not Iran. The stability of Iran is not being challenged.

Of course not, not after Obama agreed to hand them hundreds of billions of dollars so they can finance more terroism, kill more Americans and build a nuke, dude.

The remark was about how libtards betray our friends and kiss the asses of our enemies, not ongoing casualties.

Just because something said is different from what you thought it was doesn't make the comment wrong. It just makes you a silly twaddler.

 

[Camp]

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

That is complete and unqualified twaddle.

You fight the war, then you win the war, then you fight to win the following peace.

We have been losing about 1,000 servicemen's lives every year since the end of WW2 and knowing that we had a secure nation does not discredit nor diminish a single one of them, dude.

You are desperate for excuses. All anyone has to do is look at the casualty list to see that the war was not over. The first year after Bush left saw 149 US KIA's. The following years 60 (2010) and 54 (2011).

Your comparison to WWII is to desperately dumb to even offer a response.

Me desperate for excuses when all I did was relay FACTs to you? roflmao

Which of my facts are you questioning, or was that just more libtard broiler plate bullshit?

FACT: we have been losing about 1,000 men dying in peacetime from various causes since the end of WW2 as our global commitments have expanded our training in a wild variety of environments.

FACT: Iraq and Afghanistan were in much better shape in 2007 than they are now due to basic predictable blunders by the Obama regime because they don't have a thimble of military experience ont he whole WH staff.

FACT: Iraq is falling apart, Afghanistan is heading toward Taliban control and the Obama regime cannot even beat the JV team in the form of ISIS.

FACT you stupid ass mouth breathing idiots are fucking around with wild fire and that violence is coming here to OUR SHORES, you stupid freak.,

Take a look at some of it.



Libtard stupidity, incompetence, apathy and disdain will NOT be forgotten, nor forgiven.

You are trying to change the subject where you have lost your argument. The topic of discussion was whether Bush left office with Iraq being secure and stable.
BTW, combat casualties in Iraq are not the same as training and accident casualties, which also occurred during the time frame that the additional casualties were occurring in Iraq.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

That is complete and unqualified twaddle.

You fight the war, then you win the war, then you fight to win the following peace.

We have been losing about 1,000 servicemen's lives every year since the end of WW2 and knowing that we had a secure nation does not discredit nor diminish a single one of them, dude.

You are desperate for excuses. All anyone has to do is look at the casualty list to see that the war was not over. The first year after Bush left saw 149 US KIA's. The following years 60 (2010) and 54 (2011).

Your comparison to WWII is to desperately dumb to even offer a response.

Me desperate for excuses when all I did was relay FACTs to you? roflmao

Which of my facts are you questioning, or was that just more libtard broiler plate bullshit?

FACT: we have been losing about 1,000 men dying in peacetime from various causes since the end of WW2 as our global commitments have expanded our training in a wild variety of environments.

FACT: Iraq and Afghanistan were in much better shape in 2007 than they are now due to basic predictable blunders by the Obama regime because they don't have a thimble of military experience ont he whole WH staff.

FACT: Iraq is falling apart, Afghanistan is heading toward Taliban control and the Obama regime cannot even beat the JV team in the form of ISIS.

FACT you stupid ass mouth breathing idiots are fucking around with wild fire and that violence is coming here to OUR SHORES, you stupid freak.,

Take a look at some of it.



Libtard stupidity, incompetence, apathy and disdain will NOT be forgotten, nor forgiven.

You are trying to change the subject where you have lost your argument. The topic of discussion was whether Bush left office with Iraq being secure and stable.

I haven't lost jack shit, dude. ALL occupations lead to casualties, whether it was us in Germany us in Iraq.

BTW, combat casualties in Iraq are not the same as training and accident casualties, which also occurred during the time frame that the additional casualties were occurring in Iraq.

Of course, all casualties are different, just like snow flakes.

 

[Camp]

I find it somewhat disturbing when folks attempt to hide the sacrifices made for three years by US troops in Iraq when they make the claim that Bush left Iraq stable and secure. If Iraq were stable and secure when Bush left the traumatic head injuries, lost limbs and thousands of WIA's would not have continued for three more years and cost the lives of 263 troops and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

That is complete and unqualified twaddle.

You fight the war, then you win the war, then you fight to win the following peace.

We have been losing about 1,000 servicemen's lives every year since the end of WW2 and knowing that we had a secure nation does not discredit nor diminish a single one of them, dude.

You are desperate for excuses. All anyone has to do is look at the casualty list to see that the war was not over. The first year after Bush left saw 149 US KIA's. The following years 60 (2010) and 54 (2011).

Your comparison to WWII is to desperately dumb to even offer a response.

Me desperate for excuses when all I did was relay FACTs to you? roflmao

Which of my facts are you questioning, or was that just more libtard broiler plate bullshit?

FACT: we have been losing about 1,000 men dying in peacetime from various causes since the end of WW2 as our global commitments have expanded our training in a wild variety of environments.

FACT: Iraq and Afghanistan were in much better shape in 2007 than they are now due to basic predictable blunders by the Obama regime because they don't have a thimble of military experience ont he whole WH staff.

FACT: Iraq is falling apart, Afghanistan is heading toward Taliban control and the Obama regime cannot even beat the JV team in the form of ISIS.

FACT you stupid ass mouth breathing idiots are fucking around with wild fire and that violence is coming here to OUR SHORES, you stupid freak.,

Take a look at some of it.



Libtard stupidity, incompetence, apathy and disdain will NOT be forgotten, nor forgiven.

You are trying to change the subject where you have lost your argument. The topic of discussion was whether Bush left office with Iraq being secure and stable.

I haven't lost jack shit, dude. ALL occupations lead to casualties, whether it was us in Germany us in Iraq.

BTW, combat casualties in Iraq are not the same as training and accident casualties, which also occurred during the time frame that the additional casualties were occurring in Iraq.

Of course, all casualties are different, just like snow flakes.

There haven't been combat casualties in Germany since 1945. The casualties that happened in Iraq after Bush left office were combat casualties caused during combat operations that had been scheduled and planned and occurred in a declared combat zone by troops collecting combat pay.
No matter how much you squirm and weasel to avoid honesty, accuracy and truth, you can not escape the fact that when Bush turned over control of Iraq and the military to Obama the Theater of Operations were not stable and secure and was still an active combat zone suffering from combat casualties and requiring regular combat operations. Stable and secure does not include having troops blown up by roadside bombs, shot by snipers and killed or wounded in enemy ambushes at the average rate of a three KIA's per week.

 

[2aguy]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

Not a lie, total truth, were we fighting terrorists there, yes, was the country stable, yes…and then obama pulled out all the troops, and denied reinforcements to iraq and the few he gave came with a time limit, not based on the mission, but based on getting out in a year...

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Its simply fact that Bush decimated a country, killed hundreds of thousands and ran the US into a recession for no reason. It was BUSH who mandated that the US leave Iraq. It was a mess when he left and Obama has cleaned up SOME of it. And of course, while Bush protected bin Laden, Obama killed him. Same with other terrorists. Bush didn't go after them because there was no money in it for him/Cheney.

 

[David_42]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

You're joking, right?

 

[2aguy]

Its simply fact that Bush decimated a country, killed hundreds of thousands and ran the US into a recession for no reason. It was BUSH who mandated that the US leave Iraq. It was a mess when he left and Obama has cleaned up SOME of it. And of course, while Bush protected bin Laden, Obama killed him. Same with other terrorists. Bush didn't go after them because there was no money in it for him/Cheney.

You guys are so stupid…….

The terrorists killed the iraqis and afghans while our troops fought trying to keep innocent civilians alive, the recession came on during the end of clinton's term and the housing mess was a democrat issue, and obama pulled the troops, knowing that there was a rise in isis………Bush had a deadline which was never meant to abandon the country to the terrorists, obama wanted out and he pulled the troops, not caring what happened after that….

NOw we have muslim immigrants flooding Europe, iran getting the bomb and isis gaining power…..all because of obama.

 

[August West]

But Bush was president, and what he messed up doesn't just go away because he's not president any more. He will still be responsible for the disaster that was the post war balls up for the rest of history. Oh dear, now isn't that difficult for you to cope with?

Didn't you hear???

Obozo said that got fixed....

Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

Then he proceeded to fuck shit up!!!!

How did he mess it up? He left it to rule itself. That means Obama wasn't ruling it. Go figure.

Instead it was Bush's puppet ruling things.

Let's see...

He lied about ISIS, and called them the JV Team while they grew...




.Then Obozo started illegal wars in Libya and Syria where ISIS could spread to there...

Need I go on???

He lied about ISIS? How did he lie?

So you have a problem with illegal wars then? Like Iraq? I'm not going to say Libya wasn't something Obama did that was good. It wasn't.

As for Syria. Obama didn't start it. It's a consequence of the Arab Spring which was a consequence of the war in Iraq.

Need you go on? Yes, you should, try being a little more specific and a little more intelligent about the way you present things, like, by backing stuff up, for example.

Iraq was illegal???

Damn, Hillary voted for it, and got all the other Democrats to vote for it too!!!

You had better call the FBI, and have them arrest her fat ass!!!


And BTW, Obozo was a big supporter of the Arab Spring and encouraged it...

So Hillary voted to authorize a war after listening to 935 lies. You knew that right? Bush told 260 lies while Powell told another 244.
Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com

 

[Obiwan]

Didn't you hear???

Obozo said that got fixed....

Flashback » Obama: 'We're Leaving Behind A Sovereign, Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq' - YouTube

Then he proceeded to fuck shit up!!!!

How did he mess it up? He left it to rule itself. That means Obama wasn't ruling it. Go figure.

Instead it was Bush's puppet ruling things.

Let's see...

He lied about ISIS, and called them the JV Team while they grew...




.Then Obozo started illegal wars in Libya and Syria where ISIS could spread to there...

Need I go on???

He lied about ISIS? How did he lie?

So you have a problem with illegal wars then? Like Iraq? I'm not going to say Libya wasn't something Obama did that was good. It wasn't.

As for Syria. Obama didn't start it. It's a consequence of the Arab Spring which was a consequence of the war in Iraq.

Need you go on? Yes, you should, try being a little more specific and a little more intelligent about the way you present things, like, by backing stuff up, for example.

Iraq was illegal???

Damn, Hillary voted for it, and got all the other Democrats to vote for it too!!!

You had better call the FBI, and have them arrest her fat ass!!!


And BTW, Obozo was a big supporter of the Arab Spring and encouraged it...

So Hillary voted to authorize a war after listening to 935 lies. You knew that right? Bush told 260 lies while Powell told another 244.
Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com

Actually, Hillary had a security clearance, and access to all of the Intel..

Are you implying that Hillary was a party involved in lying to the American people???

 

[Camp]

Libtards are not the only ones who have governed the US, but that is not what I said.

Only libtards are capable of screwing everything up so bad that we have no border control, no national security, inability to stomp out small terrorists groups like ISIS was, nor can they even administer a successful website roll out, a back up email system, nor recognize classified materials sent by foreign governments.

Libtard incompetence rivals exponential growth for its destructiveness and sheer suicidal idiocy.

Funny you should say that, because, er.... Bush stuffed things up so badly in Iraq, he caused so much hatred towards the US, he caused ISIS and this has led to a massive refugee crisis that the US is going to suffer National Security problems for DECADES.

You blame the left for not being able to stomp out the "small terrorist groups like ISIS", but you don't blame the right for creating the perfect petri dish for them in the first place.

It's this partisan BS that is causing all these problems in the first place. If the US govt actually thought about things, if the politicians weren't bought by big money, if the voters were, for the most part, completely malleable idiots who vote for whoever can convince them of something they're not, then maybe the US wouldn't be having so many problems.

No…Bush left Iraq and Afhganistan stable and secure….obama pulled out all of our troops even knowing the growing threat of isis….

No he didn't. That is a lie and an insult to the combat troops who fought, and the troops who lost their lives or were injured when Bush left office and dumped his mess on the country and new President to clean up.

Not a lie, total truth, were we fighting terrorists there, yes, was the country stable, yes…and then obama pulled out all the troops, and denied reinforcements to iraq and the few he gave came with a time limit, not based on the mission, but based on getting out in a year...

Our troops were fighting the same insurgency in 2009, 2010, and 2011 under Obama as the troops who fought the previous years under Bush. It took three years of fighting before the level of stability and security was reached in 2012. You guys just want to ignore '09, '10, and '11 because that doesn't fit with your revisionism and misinterpretation of history. You want to declare that Bush left Iraq stable and secure and that is a lie at worst and a purposeful misrepresentation at best. You simple stating that Iraq was stable over and over does not make it so.