Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And they say that the left doesn't want to take our guns? Lol.
Oh, no, you can walk around with a 9 mm stuck up your ass all day long for the thrill, I'm simply talking about those assault weapons that were once ONLY used in wars......We once DID have a ban on selling Tommy Guns because we feared that those dark skinned folks would get their hands on them.
Well make up your mind. Do you want to go by the constitution or not?
Did I say otherwise in that post? I pointed out that they are 9 lawyers, politically appointed….and their decisions are not the word of God…and we need to amend the constitution to dilute some of their power.
In what way? They are a part of the Checks and Balances. If we're going to curb the power every time one of the three branches fucks up than we may as well go back the Articles of Confederation.
9 politically appointed lawyers should not have the final say on what is Constitutional…..there should be an over ride through congress when the Supreme Court really screws up.
That is how the SCOTUS was set up the Founding Fathers and ratified by states. Congress can pass a law challenging the courts or they can amend the Constitution making their ruling moot. We're not going to turn Checks and Balances on it's head.
They never envisioned the Court having the power it does. And giving a congressional over ride to a stupid supreme court decision does not turn checks and balances on it's head….it is another check on the power of 9, unelected, politically appointed, life time job holding lawyers….where one vote can decide the fate of 320 million people….
And they say that the left doesn't want to take our guns? Lol.
Oh, no, you can walk around with a 9 mm stuck up your ass all day long for the thrill, I'm simply talking about those assault weapons that were once ONLY used in wars......We once DID have a ban on selling Tommy Guns because we feared that those dark skinned folks would get their hands on them.
Did I say otherwise in that post? I pointed out that they are 9 lawyers, politically appointed….and their decisions are not the word of God…and we need to amend the constitution to dilute some of their power.
In what way? They are a part of the Checks and Balances. If we're going to curb the power every time one of the three branches fucks up than we may as well go back the Articles of Confederation.
9 politically appointed lawyers should not have the final say on what is Constitutional…..there should be an over ride through congress when the Supreme Court really screws up.
That is how the SCOTUS was set up the Founding Fathers and ratified by states. Congress can pass a law challenging the courts or they can amend the Constitution making their ruling moot. We're not going to turn Checks and Balances on it's head.
They never envisioned the Court having the power it does. And giving a congressional over ride to a stupid supreme court decision does not turn checks and balances on it's head….it is another check on the power of 9, unelected, politically appointed, life time job holding lawyers….where one vote can decide the fate of 320 million people….
Congress already has override features. They can pass a law challenging the ruling or they can Amend the Constitution. Why do people insisted on mentioning that the Justices are life-appointed and un-elected? They are supposed to be un-elected and appointed for life. That is exactly what The Federalist Papers argue for and what was ratified by the states.
In what way? They are a part of the Checks and Balances. If we're going to curb the power every time one of the three branches fucks up than we may as well go back the Articles of Confederation.
9 politically appointed lawyers should not have the final say on what is Constitutional…..there should be an over ride through congress when the Supreme Court really screws up.
That is how the SCOTUS was set up the Founding Fathers and ratified by states. Congress can pass a law challenging the courts or they can amend the Constitution making their ruling moot. We're not going to turn Checks and Balances on it's head.
They never envisioned the Court having the power it does. And giving a congressional over ride to a stupid supreme court decision does not turn checks and balances on it's head….it is another check on the power of 9, unelected, politically appointed, life time job holding lawyers….where one vote can decide the fate of 320 million people….
Congress already has override features. They can pass a law challenging the ruling or they can Amend the Constitution. Why do people insisted on mentioning that the Justices are life-appointed and un-elected? They are supposed to be un-elected and appointed for life. That is exactly what The Federalist Papers argue for and what was ratified by the states.
I didn't say anything about that, I am pointing out that the decision of what is or is not Constitutional should not be left in the hands of one Supreme Court Justice……a politically appointed lawyer…..
So on 2-3 illegal uses of a product, in a gun free zone you created that actually allows them to be used illegally….you want to take the rifles from law abiding gun owners who own 356,999,998 rifles that were not used to commit any crimes?
You do realize that the only difference between a "hunting" rifle and an "assault" rifle are how they look?And they say that the left doesn't want to take our guns? Lol.
Oh, no, you can walk around with a 9 mm stuck up your ass all day long for the thrill, I'm simply talking about those assault weapons that were once ONLY used in wars......We once DID have a ban on selling Tommy Guns because we feared that those dark skinned folks would get their hands on them.
So on 2-3 illegal uses of a product, in a gun free zone you created that actually allows them to be used illegally….you want to take the rifles from law abiding gun owners who own 356,999,998 rifles that were not used to commit any crimes?
No, no.....I am actually advocating that EVERY SINGLE CITIZEN should get and openly carry one of those weapons,.......now THAT should curb the over-population
The SCOTUS isn't infallible. My hope is that, if they if do fuck up royally that Congress would act and fix it via legislation.
Good lord, I hope my optimism isn't making me naive. lol
The Supreme Court is made up of 9 politically appointed lawyers……to say they aren't infallible is a mighty understatement…..
Well make up your mind. Do you want to go by the constitution or not?
Did I say otherwise in that post? I pointed out that they are 9 lawyers, politically appointed….and their decisions are not the word of God…and we need to amend the constitution to dilute some of their power.
In what way? They are a part of the Checks and Balances. If we're going to curb the power every time one of the three branches fucks up than we may as well go back the Articles of Confederation.
9 politically appointed lawyers should not have the final say on what is Constitutional…..there should be an over ride through congress when the Supreme Court really screws up.
