Let the nation default?

Should Republicans let the nation default if Democrats refuse to negotiate?

  • Yes, if the Dems won't talk, we should default.

    Votes: 30 47.6%
  • No, we should never default on our debt.

    Votes: 33 52.4%

  • Total voters
    63
God bless the Tea Party!! :clap2::clap2::clap2:

All that aside however, was it not YOUR boy who made the above remarks?? Back when he exhibited a little sanity?

I noticed that you merely glossed over what your leader said in 2006......

Let me guess......In 2000, after Bill Clinton had performed a minor miracle by turning the Reagan era deficits into surpluses, you heard Scrub offer his Return to Supply Side Idiocy pitch and said:

"Yeah......I gotta have me some more of that."

and then, in 2004, after Scrub had vaporized the 5 trillion dollar projected cumulative surplus, your response was something along the lines of:

"4 MORE YEARS!"

Then in 2009, you joined your fellow Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Teabaggers in discovering the "Ebils of Deficits"....

Do I have that about right?

Well done.
 
God bless the Tea Party!! :clap2::clap2::clap2:

All that aside however, was it not YOUR boy who made the above remarks?? Back when he exhibited a little sanity?

I noticed that you merely glossed over what your leader said in 2006......

Let me guess......In 2000, after Bill Clinton had performed a minor miracle by turning the Reagan era deficits into surpluses, you heard Scrub offer his Return to Supply Side Idiocy pitch and said:

"Yeah......I gotta have me some more of that."

and then, in 2004, after Scrub had vaporized the 5 trillion dollar projected cumulative surplus, your response was something along the lines of:

"4 MORE YEARS!"

Then in 2009, you joined your fellow Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Teabaggers in discovering the "Ebils of Deficits"....

Do I have that about right?

No. In fact, that might be the STUPIDEST thing ever posted on the Internet. Good job!
 
God bless the Tea Party!! :clap2::clap2::clap2:

All that aside however, was it not YOUR boy who made the above remarks?? Back when he exhibited a little sanity?

I noticed that you merely glossed over what your leader said in 2006......

Let me guess......In 2000, after Bill Clinton had performed a minor miracle by turning the Reagan era deficits into surpluses, you heard Scrub offer his Return to Supply Side Idiocy pitch and said:

"Yeah......I gotta have me some more of that."

and then, in 2004, after Scrub had vaporized the 5 trillion dollar projected cumulative surplus, your response was something along the lines of:

"4 MORE YEARS!"

Then in 2009, you joined your fellow Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Teabaggers in discovering the "Ebils of Deficits"....

Do I have that about right?

No. In fact, that might be the STUPIDEST thing ever posted on the Internet. Good job!

Uh oh! They are a bit worried about you Ice........
 
The question is not 'if' we default, the questions are 'when' and 'who'. The math can't be denied.

Best case scenario... the sooner the better, and screw the Chinese first.
 
Let me guess......In 2000, after Bill Clinton had performed a minor miracle by turning the Reagan era deficits into surpluses, you heard Scrub offer his Return to Supply Side Idiocy pitch and said:

"Yeah......I gotta have me some more of that."

and then, in 2004, after Scrub had vaporized the 5 trillion dollar projected cumulative surplus, your response was something along the lines of:

"4 MORE YEARS!"

Then in 2009, you joined your fellow Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Teabaggers in discovering the "Ebils of Deficits"....

Do I have that about right?

No. In fact, that might be the STUPIDEST thing ever posted on the Internet. Good job!

Uh oh! They are a bit worried about you Ice........

Man's gotta keep his pimp hand strong......
 
The question is not 'if' we default, the questions are 'when' and 'who'. The math can't be denied.

Best case scenario... the sooner the better, and screw the Chinese first.

Bullshit.

Tax capital gains as income.

Eliminate the $100,000 income cap on Social Security.

Cut defense. We have 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Problem solved.
 
The question is not 'if' we default, the questions are 'when' and 'who'. The math can't be denied.

Best case scenario... the sooner the better, and screw the Chinese first.

Bullshit.

Tax capital gains as income.

Eliminate the $100,000 income cap on Social Security.

Cut defense. We have 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Problem solved.

So your solution is to reduce tax revenue and sell nuclear weapons?

Ok... lets see the numbers on that....
 
The question is not 'if' we default, the questions are 'when' and 'who'. The math can't be denied.

Best case scenario... the sooner the better, and screw the Chinese first.

Bullshit.

Tax capital gains as income.

Eliminate the $100,000 income cap on Social Security.

Cut defense. We have 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Problem solved.

So your solution is to reduce tax revenue and sell nuclear weapons?

Ok... lets see the numbers on that....

Reading comprehension problems?

Raise taxes on the rich and cut defense.

Clinton did it and balanced the budget.

It's called arithmetic.
 
The question is not 'if' we default, the questions are 'when' and 'who'. The math can't be denied.

Best case scenario... the sooner the better, and screw the Chinese first.

Bullshit.

Tax capital gains as income.

Eliminate the $100,000 income cap on Social Security.

Cut defense. We have 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Problem solved.

If we eliminate the income cap on SS, we will pay more SS to rich people. That doesn't make much sense.
 
Republican Congressmen are not doing their Constitutional duty. They were hired to pass bills, pay our country's debts, not hold the country hostage unless they get their way.

Oh, I see. They are supposed to be rubber stampers.

They are not supposed to determine if an item is Constitutional or financially sound.

:cuckoo:

Yo hypocrite, the cons holding this country hostage is unconstitutional. If they want to repeal healthcare, or balance the budget, there is a constitutional way to do it, and they're not. Your efforts to defend terrorists makes you a terrorist and a traitor to America.

Hyperbole much?
:cuckoo:

What the House is doing is absolutely constitutional, as they control the purse strings.

Why are you so determined to pass the biggest middle class tax increase in our lifetime?
 
Bullshit.

Tax capital gains as income.

Eliminate the $100,000 income cap on Social Security.

Cut defense. We have 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Problem solved.

So your solution is to reduce tax revenue and sell nuclear weapons?

Ok... lets see the numbers on that....

Reading comprehension problems?

Raise taxes on the rich and cut defense.

Clinton did it and balanced the budget.

It's called arithmetic.

Yea, but Clinton COMPROMISED with the House during our last shutdown.
Where is Obama's seat at the negotiating table?
 
So your solution is to reduce tax revenue and sell nuclear weapons?

Ok... lets see the numbers on that....

Reading comprehension problems?

Raise taxes on the rich and cut defense.

Clinton did it and balanced the budget.

It's called arithmetic.

Yea, but Clinton COMPROMISED with the House during our last shutdown.
Where is Obama's seat at the negotiating table?

Yep. The 'Invite' by Obama this past week was LIP service, Photo op...HE feels the pressure. He, nor Dingy Harry Reid are going to budge. BOTH are going after the low info voter...you know? The dupes that don't pay attention?
 
God bless the Tea Party!! :clap2::clap2::clap2:

All that aside however, was it not YOUR boy who made the above remarks?? Back when he exhibited a little sanity?

I noticed that you merely glossed over what your leader said in 2006......

Let me guess......In 2000, after Bill Clinton had performed a minor miracle by turning the Reagan era deficits into surpluses, you heard Scrub offer his Return to Supply Side Idiocy pitch and said:

"Yeah......I gotta have me some more of that."

and then, in 2004, after Scrub had vaporized the 5 trillion dollar projected cumulative surplus, your response was something along the lines of:

"4 MORE YEARS!"

Then in 2009, you joined your fellow Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Teabaggers in discovering the "Ebils of Deficits"....

Do I have that about right?

If we could have the 104th, the 105th, and the 106th Congresses with Republican majorities like Clinton had, we wouldn't be having these budget problems. As it is, Obama has just enough political power to screw things up. And the situation will not get any better until the GOP takes over the Senate.
 
God bless the Tea Party!! :clap2::clap2::clap2:

All that aside however, was it not YOUR boy who made the above remarks?? Back when he exhibited a little sanity?

I noticed that you merely glossed over what your leader said in 2006......

Let me guess......In 2000, after Bill Clinton had performed a minor miracle by turning the Reagan era deficits into surpluses, you heard Scrub offer his Return to Supply Side Idiocy pitch and said:

"Yeah......I gotta have me some more of that."

and then, in 2004, after Scrub had vaporized the 5 trillion dollar projected cumulative surplus, your response was something along the lines of:

"4 MORE YEARS!"

Then in 2009, you joined your fellow Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Teabaggers in discovering the "Ebils of Deficits"....

Do I have that about right?

If we could have the 104th, the 105th, and the 106th Congresses with Republican majorities like Clinton had, we wouldn't be having these budget problems. As it is, Obama has just enough political power to screw things up. And the situation will not get any better until the GOP takes over the Senate.

Scrub did.......and illustrated that they weren't the determining variable...meanwhile, under Obama the deficit has been halved....

go figger
 

Forum List

Back
Top