Liberalism: "It's All About Me"

[PoliticalChic]

You're nuts, superdupe.

You're saying you don't see the value of making children wards of the state?

WTH are you talking about? Of course not...unless they're extremely unfortunate...

I guess you just haven't gotten those marching orders yet; don't worry, as a useful idiot, you'll get behind it when the time comes.

He's practicing heel-clicking as we speak.

More of the big lie from the chumps of lying, brainwashing, thieving GOP billionaires....Only the RW (on the way to RW fascism [the only kind] at this rate) have a bs hate giant propaganda/fake news machine. See sig- all fact. ("There was no depression in 1929 or 2008- and the Dems caused them" LOL!)

"There was no depression in 1929 or 2008- and the Dems caused them" LOL!)"

As you are, if nothing else, inarticulate, one must guess at the meaning of your chicken-scratchings....


...but, based on your other inchoate postings, you are attempting to hide the iniquities of the Liberals/Democrats.

The following will, no doubt, be above your pay grade, but more intelligent readers will get the drift:
1. If FDR did not intend for the Depression to go on and on, why did it last five times longer than any of the other 30 or so economic downturns in our economic history?
And why did other nations end the even earlier than the US?

An accident???
Hardly.


2. Would the mortgage meltdown have ever occurred had not FDR invaded the private housing market....with no such authorization from the Constitution?
Of course not.


QED...both the events of the 1930s and that of 2007-2010 need be laid at the feet of the Democrats.


You may now toss the roses at me.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I guess you just haven't gotten those marching orders yet; don't worry, as a useful idiot, you'll get behind it when the time comes.

He's practicing heel-clicking as we speak.

More of the big lie from the chumps of lying, brainwashing, thieving GOP billionaires....Only the RW (on the way to RW fascism [the only kind] at this rate) have a bs hate giant propaganda/fake news machine. See sig- all fact. ("There was no depression in 1929 or 2008- and the Dems caused them" LOL!)

Wait.....you actually went to the trouble to author this post in an effort to deny that you were "practicing heel-clicking as we speak" ????????

Remember all the times I referred to you as a dunce?

I realize now that I was far too kind.

WTH are you talking about? Of course not...unless they're extremely unfortunate...

I guess you just haven't gotten those marching orders yet; don't worry, as a useful idiot, you'll get behind it when the time comes.

He's practicing heel-clicking as we speak.

More of the big lie from the chumps of lying, brainwashing, thieving GOP billionaires....Only the RW (on the way to RW fascism [the only kind] at this rate) have a bs hate giant propaganda/fake news machine. See sig- all fact. ("There was no depression in 1929 or 2008- and the Dems caused them" LOL!)

"Only the RW (on the way to RW fascism [the only kind] at this rate)"

WHAT????

How many times must I correct you????

Fascism, as is Nazism, and Communism.....and Liberalism......is Left wing doctrine.



But.....Noblesse oblige!
As you have come to rely on me to fill in the educational lacunae....prodigious in fact....I will have to do so once again.




"After 1919, the Fascists developed a theory of the state; until then this was the one element in Fascist political theory which had not been elaborated. Its elaboration, in an extended public debate, gave rise to the "totalitarian" view of the state, notoriously expounded in Mussolini's formula, "Everything in the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state." [The word "totalitarian" (totalitario) was first used against Fascism by a liberal opponent, Giovanni Amendola. It was then taken up proudly by Fascists to characterize their own form of state. Later the term was widely employed to refer to the common features of the Fascist, Soviet, and Nazi dictatorships or to denote an ideal type of unlimited government. In this sense, the word was in common use among Anglophone intellectuals by 1935, and in the popular media by 1941."
"The Mystery of Fascism"

by David Ramsay Steele

No mystery. Brand new (2005) RW balderdash, for ignorant dupes only...

I've just posted facts, and you have burnished your credentials as one of the most ignorant of posters.

Next time you go to a mind reader try and remember that you are entitled to a substantial discount.

 

[Tax Man]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

You did....which proves that, as I revealed in your earlier post, you are simply talking through your hat.

Your manufactured opinion has been both duly noted, and given all the consideration it deserves...you can go back to your blanket fort and keep coloring.

 

[Tax Man]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

You did....which proves that, as I revealed in your earlier post, you are simply talking through your hat.

Your manufactured opinion has been both duly noted, and given all the consideration it deserves...you can go back to your blanket fort and keep coloring.

To a liberal your posts are a vestige of self interest and delusion. I can appreciate your inability to keep on the subject.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

You did....which proves that, as I revealed in your earlier post, you are simply talking through your hat.

Your manufactured opinion has been both duly noted, and given all the consideration it deserves...you can go back to your blanket fort and keep coloring.

To a liberal your posts are a vestige of self interest and delusion. I can appreciate your inability to keep on the subject.

I thoroughly enjoyed eviscerating you here:

And when one moron offered this myth, "the earth is only so big and at the rate the cons are using up resources there will be no resources left in 50 years," I provided the destruct of that tale, one that exploded it 30 years ago: "The entire world population could fit in the state of Texas and it’d only have the population density of New York City!"

But....on the Left, Malthus survives.
They need the fear of some impending tragic event to enforce the belief that only big, coercive government will save them.



and here:

And the same dolt offered this lie: "for planned Parenthood the majority of the abortions provided are for the religious reich children who though the rhythm method worked. Liberal women go for prenatal care and help with childbirth." Liberalism: "It's All About Me"

The truth is very different:
" within walking distance of African American or Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods."http://www.protectingblacklife.org/pp_targets/

The original design of Planned Parenthood was the eradication of 'undesirable' populations.




I get that warm, fuzzy feeling that only cruelty to the stupid can provide.....
....so don't hesitate to drop back when you require more of the same.

 

[initforme]

we adopted from Russia so we did our part. We are pro life and attempted to adopt here only to have red tape in our way. I'm the end we came out ahead and helped take a child out of a Russian orphanage which helps America.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

A little more cognitive? Maybe, I'd vote for a lot more honest. BTW, it's not her ignorance, per se, it is parroted material from obscure authors of conspiracy theories.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The Pope Just Approved A Brutal Condemnation Of The White House’s "Fake Christianity"
The Vatican's top publication did not mince its words when it came to Trump and Bannon.
washingtonjournal.com

 

[Mac1958]

The libertarians, and much of the GOP, are pining for the days of the Olde West, every man for himself, you're on your own.

If that isn't "it's all about me", nothing is.
.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The libertarians, and much of the GOP, are pining for the days of the Olde West, every man for himself, you're on your own.

If that isn't "it's all about me", nothing is.
.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

You did....which proves that, as I revealed in your earlier post, you are simply talking through your hat.

Your manufactured opinion has been both duly noted, and given all the consideration it deserves...you can go back to your blanket fort and keep coloring.

To a liberal your posts are a vestige of self interest and delusion. I can appreciate your inability to keep on the subject.

Liberals are for the most part emotional regressives so who gives a rat's ass what they think?

I certainly don't. Fuck all of you, with a petrified stick.

 

[initforme]

America is about taking care of ones own self. In this sense of course its about self first. For my family its god first self second country on the list somewhere.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I suppose the good news is that Liberalism is a self-defeating trap.
Conservatives and traditionalists have lots of children,but for Liberals, having children is a bad idea.

Of course it gets worse than that, as Leftists are all about abortion and eugenics, too.

Sooo....there should be fewer and fewer of them in the long run.




Check this out:
"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic
✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources. https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order: at the margins, having children makes you a bad person.

But sidelining the moral argument for a second, Filipovic's claim is also remarkable for its idiocy.

After all, the premise of Filipovic's argument — that Earth cannot co-exist with a growing human population — rests on the Guardian article that her tweet links to. That article references researchers who have listed all the things that produce carbon emissions."
Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral


Since the view that the earth can't sustain 7 or 8 billion folks has been debunked numerous times, my presumption about the self-centeredness of Leftisim must be the case.



In fact one of the godfathers of Leftism put it this way:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

Gee I thought they had kids so they could live off of them. Make up your mind.

Wealthy liberal elitists don't have lots of kids but they bank on economically disadvantaged trailer park and ghetto moms to keep having kids so that the wealthy elite can get their votes....... pretty fucking immoral.

 

[initforme]

left why do you think people should have kids? You complain about entitlements and etc. I believe you would rethink it so that the birthrate in America takes a sharp dive for many years. Unemployment goes down. Less money on entitlements. Win win

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps if you were to quit trying to be prescient and a little more cognitive more people would read your nescient postings.

A little more cognitive? Maybe, I'd vote for a lot more honest. BTW, it's not her ignorance, per se, it is parroted material from obscure authors of conspiracy theories.

Put up or....you know.

Find anything I've posted and try to dispute it or refute it.

Then watch me rip you a new one.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The libertarians, and much of the GOP, are pining for the days of the Olde West, every man for himself, you're on your own.

If that isn't "it's all about me", nothing is.
.

Coming out against the Right????

I'm really proud of you: I've forced you to actually take a position!!!

An erroneous one, of course, but....an actual position.
A step in the right direction, fence sitter.

Who ever thought you would actually grow a pair!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

The libertarians, and much of the GOP, are pining for the days of the Olde West, every man for himself, you're on your own.

If that isn't "it's all about me", nothing is.
.

The most amusing of all is when the supporters of communism, socialism, Liberalism, and every sort of coercive government,.....and well-known haters of religion.....try to pretend that Judeo-Christian tradition supports their doctrines.


The moron who was reduced to the fabrication suggested in his 'cartoon' is a perfect case in point..

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I suppose the good news is that Liberalism is a self-defeating trap.
Conservatives and traditionalists have lots of children,but for Liberals, having children is a bad idea.

Of course it gets worse than that, as Leftists are all about abortion and eugenics, too.

Sooo....there should be fewer and fewer of them in the long run.




Check this out:
"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic
✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources. https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order: at the margins, having children makes you a bad person.

But sidelining the moral argument for a second, Filipovic's claim is also remarkable for its idiocy.

After all, the premise of Filipovic's argument — that Earth cannot co-exist with a growing human population — rests on the Guardian article that her tweet links to. That article references researchers who have listed all the things that produce carbon emissions."
Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral


Since the view that the earth can't sustain 7 or 8 billion folks has been debunked numerous times, my presumption about the self-centeredness of Leftisim must be the case.



In fact one of the godfathers of Leftism put it this way:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

I have known this for quite a while now, as I see planned parenthood as the primary source of the upcoming extinction of liberals. 33,000 unborn and born babies from liberal parents are executed under the doctors scissors. Also they love to do drugs which also is having a devastating effect on their older and sometimes younger children, and instead of letting the government continue the war against drugs, the liberals are out their touting "let them be, stop the war on drugs". When all liberals are finally gone, then the world will be a better, happier place.

NWO Plans To Depopulate The Earth

There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finially, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.

See? What conservatives really want is to outlaw abortion AND birth control.

I could care less if a liberal wants to execute their unborn child, I just don't want to be the one having to foot the bill, just like I don't like footing the bill for your sorry ass to eat. Get off your lazy fucking ass and get a job, you know , from that Obama economic recovery, where the stock market soared, the rich got richer and the most in poverty. Yeah that one pea brain. Liberals please keep aborting your children, and soon there wont be any more liberals, and the world would be a better place.